• ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The aircraft has significant security risks for sure and makes sense to cancel. But canceling the order won’t be on Trump’s radar unless it affects his inner circle of evil billionaires who have funneled dark money to him.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Canada should cancel the F-35 contract and their are better fighter jets from reliable NATO allies. The F-35 is a $2 trillion USD turd that is still not 100%. If Canada continues to purchase US weapons, this would be like Poland buying weapons from Nazi Germany. I am hoping the US MIC becomes pissed off.

  • RaskolnikovsAxe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Goddamn right we should. Take the French up on the offer to build the Rafale here. Or the Swedes. And get a few demo units for short term.

    Fuck 'em on any cancellation fees too. Consider it partial compensation for the ridiculous trade war.

  • yannic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The PM agrees with The Globe and Mail once and now they think they’ll get two in a row?

  • humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    100% TODAY! Do not pay a fucking dime of any amount owing for these. (good job on Globe and Mail for a change)

    FYI, the Israeli version of F35 does not have this “US permission for every flight required”

    F35 is a POS plane, with low uptime, in addition to “broken ownership”. Even US military does not get manuals on how to repair/maintain them and must hire Lockheed consultants to do the job. The whole program was a boondoggle to pay Lockheed the most money possible instead of getting good military equipment, and any corrupt POS that was involved in approving this purchase for Canada should be jailed for treason.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      There’s nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software. Most of the FUD about it’s performance abilities is propaganda. So getting them and just locking out Lockheed and the US would be a pretty good middle finger too.

      • humanspiral
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The performance metrics are criticisize by US military journals.

        There’s nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software.

        If US military can’t get them or patch the software, Canada can’t either. Israel is special for not putting up with US BS.

      • corsicanguppy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is the one that starved pilots of oxygen, right?

  • hddsx
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 hours ago

    American here. Who cares if it provokes Trump? Actions have consequences. Canada helped out a lot during 911. What did we do? Prove to be an unreliable partner

  • opi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I don’t think Canada should be basing their defense decisions on the opinion and thin skin of the American government. Trying to force Canada, in any way, to purchase F35’s is fishy - not that that’s happening, of course.

    Canada’s interests are for Canada. Not them. Also, maybe Canada should reboot their ventures into the Avro Arrow program again. That’ll ruffle some feathers. Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

      Here’s the bad news. It’s not. Sure, we’re good at peacekeeping, and we deploy to support (militarily) our allies. But we’re using US gear and we’re woefully underfunded because war budget has been declared a waste by even the parties who strut and posture about a strong military. We only needed to fulfill our NATO obligations, for decades, and even that has been a struggle we haven’t won consistently with the low budget.

      And while we’re skilled enough and gung-ho, and our 1st Pioneers are about the most scary bunch of lumberjack commandos you’ll ever see, there’s just so few of them, and again their gear has been called old and out of repair by every administration campaigning because the last one never did a thing about it.

      We’re gonna need a lot of funding and training and gear to make up the shortfall in people and powpow toys, and that’s a slice of gov pork that Milhouse is gonna latch onto knowing that he doesn’t need an army once he gives the country over. Justin doesn’t want to spend that, but he - and please God let it be Mark next - is really gonna have to.

      But how do we sell it to the “hair guy bad” flatlanders steeped in 12 years of hating Justin for not being a pseudo-aristocratic milquetoast conservative?

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The US can remotely disable them whenever they damn well please anyway, and can not be trusted not to.

    Everyone should be canceling their orders immediately, and disable the remote access capabilities to the ones they have.

    • wise_pancake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nobody should have ever purchased military equipment with that feature.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Has it actually been confirmed they can do this? I would assume they backdoor them, but usually backdoors are secret.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Any NATO member increasing their military spending would be idiotic to spend their money with US-based companies.

  • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    12 hours ago

    With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

      I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we’re never getting them, though.

      • wirebeads
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This would be amazing for us to bring back military building here in Canada!!

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Especially since the Americans are the ones who convinced us they had enough fighter jets to take care of us so we could/should cancel the Arrow. :/

      • barbarossa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Absolute bozo move to not go for this in retrospect. They need to give this a look again asap

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          If I had hair, I definitely would have been pulling it out at the time. It’s not like this situation came out of nowhere, but normalcy bias won the day.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Nah, y’all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

  • Franklin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

  • engene
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Let’s do it and replace them with MiGs 🤨

  • Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Every country knows the US changes faces faster than my ex girlfriend.

    At this point other countries just need to deal with 4 years of this bullshit.

    If Trump were to take over the government like Hitler did, which looks to be the case, only then would countries start looking at dropping the USA.

    • MyBrainHurts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No. There’s no telling what comes after these 4 years. The US has proven that they aren’t an ally worth relying on, we should look to more reliable partners and building them up and vice versa. Any concession or help offered by the next administration isn’t worth the paper it’s written on (just look at trump ripping up his own trade agreement for this nonsense.)

      We need allies not a neighbour that on a whim might try to throw us into a recession.

      • NotLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        When the us comes crawling back we should make them pay reparations for any economic or other damages before they’re welcomed back.

      • Grimpen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Exactly. With a Presidential Monarchy, no deal or treaty can be trusted past the next election (assuming they’ll still have those).

        More than more Trump, we are also seeing a complete abandonment of the US much vaunted system of checks and balances. You simply can’t deal with them except in 4 year periods.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If you look back at the history of the US, it’s been fairly reliable in it’s first world alliances.

        • MyBrainHurts
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, they’ve pretty strongly turned from recent history though. No one in NATO believes the US could be trusted to uphold article 5 anymore. That’s the whole issue.

          Hell, why doesn’t Ukraine have the nuclear deterrnet that it had after the collapse of the Soviet Union? Because they foolishly believed American security promises, which were given in exchange for them releasing their nukes.