Please explain to me how open source AI allows a corporation to cut creators out of the market.
Please explain to me how open source AI allows a corporation to cut creators out of the market.
Copyright and intellectual property is a lie cooked up by capitalists to edge indie creators out of the market.
True solidarity is making AI tools and freely sharing them with the world. Not all AIs are locked down by corporations.
I have a suspicion this gene would not be selected for when the mosquitos proceeded.
“We must hurt people, because they are helping the wrong people”
Woah a fishman island remaster that fixes the sound, visuals, AND PACING?
Selfishly voting instead of being compassionate towards people you might know? How very Republican.
I’m a man with a vasectomy and I still think abortion should be available to everyone.
The nose is a small smile, cover up the stripes to see it
Plus battery cost is still dropping rapidly, while the longevity has been increasing. A lot of refinement of the tech has been going on the last 10 years.
Even Starlink is amazing, global internet connectivity is a game changer. It has some serious environmental concerns with deorbiting satellites causing a dramatic uptick in atmospheric aerosols, however.
It was crazy to see the engines glowing but the nozzles cool, such an unexpected scene!
Replace it with “door falls off” and it’s not too far from the truth.
It’ll come back eventually unless fusion takes over. The power density promises are simply too attractive.
It’s a symptom of the two party system. You vote for “your guy” even if he’s a literal corpse. Let’s get some RCV and proportional representation in here and we’ll see that effect go away almost immediately.
What’s worse is this looks like butted mail instead of riveted mail, so it’ll have lots and lots of little snaggy pokey bits.
I agree that it’s probably not illegal for him to do that. But it is solvable if we decide to legislate some long overdue guardrails.
When I became atheist, I figured “if God doesn’t exist, we’ll have to make heaven ourselves.”
And I believe we’ll do it, given enough time (probably hundreds/thousands of years).
As long as it doesn’t generate any negative externalities, sure. That’s a huge alignment problem though.
I’m not so sure about that. When we compare medieval wealth inequality to now, it was worse back then. Ew, a link to Reddit, but it’s got good info.
Not saying we don’t need to fix things… we need to destroy even the concept of billionaires. While things are bad, and trending worse, they’re not yet “literally eat the rich” bad.
I don’t remember any restrictive women’s right positions for Harris. She’s strongly for legalizing abortion. Maybe you can enlighten me?