…needs to see a doctor about that infection, or at least get some Viaderm-K.C.

I swear, the limit on edibles was brought to you by the sugar lobby.

It’s been radiated to another environment.

If the water is cooled with a low-energy method like a Peltier cooler, the heat has to go somewhere.

My limited experience with Agile is being forced to share the stage with half-hour soliloquies every morning**, so as long as the dev team doesn’t have to deal with poorly-managed scrums, I’m all for it.

** I made a failed attempt at reminding everyone that it’s called a ‘standing meeting’ partly because we’re supposed to stand for its entirety. If the average person is overcome by the urge to sit down, then the _weak_ly-chaired meeting has been going on for way too long.

Edit: Instead of chair, I meant ‘scrum master’

Locking issues? News to me! I have a problem with the database migration pausing during the “[INF] Applying migration ‘MigrateRatingLevels’” step and while googling the issue, I haven’t seen enough chastising, myself.

As a precaution, I changed my CIFS mount to NFS to no avail. I’m on the cusp of doing all the necessary prep-work to officially submit an issue to GitHub.

I am allergic to grass pollen and I want this.

You’d think they would have led with that if that were the case.

Yes.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but that responsibility is limited to during working hours and/or inside the workplace. (And to be clear, I’m referring to their employer, Canada Post, not the Canadian Government, who does have the right to enforce similar mandates in a Public Health Emergencies like the one we just had)

Including the three genders?

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Racism.

The original article contains 1,540 words, the summary contains 1 word. Saved 99%. I’m a human and I’m ashamed.

Also, it was grape flavour, not cherry flavour Flavor Aid.

“could arrive soon”

The “zone of secrecy” is there for practical reasons, and based on that quote, it remains in full effect.

Thanks. The article title “tricks for Lent” points to the non-serious nature of it. Plus, it uses the phrase “According to legend” several times and doesn’t even mention the particular monestaries, nor the specific monks involved. I think it’s just meant to be a humorous jab at legalism.

Typically, if practices get so bad that they have to be forbidden by an administrative authority, then you would have some written document forbidding the practice. Although that would acknowledge it wasn’t legitimate to begin with, it would at least suggest the histriocity of it.

I tried to look this up, but ended up empty-handed. Could you point me in the right direction?

The point has been missed.

There are temporal consequences of sin, even after guilt is removed.

Also. around the mediterrainian, fish is a food staple of the poor. The point is to eliminate excess.

I’d argue that an inlander ordering fish at a fancy restaurant on a Friday during Lent is not following the spirit of the law (which can be more of a discipline than a rule, depending on the local episcopal authority), especially if it’s not a special occasion and the fish was caught hundreds of kilometers away.

My favourite is:

Them: We want less red in the pie chart. Fix that remote vulnerability.

Me: We don’t even have that component enabled. It’s reporting on a DLL file version, not the vulnerability itself.

Them: Just lower our vulnerability score.

(Me wondering if I deploying dozens of fully-patched systems would have the same proportional effect)