• dx1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sanctions not going through Congress, it’s insane that’s considered constitutional

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      He governs by decrees basically, and so did biden. Its mental gymnastics at olympic level to call the US a democratic country.

  • ILikeBoobies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like how his statement paints not accepting refugees as a negative action

    • kent_eh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Trump wouldn’t recognize hypocrisy if it walked up and kicked him in the balls.

      • dx1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Norman Finkelstein said something the other day, quoting someone else…it was…“hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue”. Meaning, evil people understand what they’re doing is wrong, that’s why they pretend to be good. Hypocrisy is beyond the point to them. They’ve sacrificed morality. Although I think Finkelstein was saying it in the context of talking about how Republican pols do so much less of even pretending to be good (though certainly not zero).

        • kent_eh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think Finkelstein’s quote takes into account a severe narcissist.

          In the narcissistic mind, the only right is something that benefits them, and the only wrong is something that harms them.

          • dx1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Well, the proof’s in the pudding - examine the evidence on this point, does he pretend to be something he’s not, better than what he is?

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What would you call forcibly expatriated people

          • Mongostein
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            By whoever put them on the plane they were on on Trump’s order that is mentioned in the post we’re talking about.

              • Mongostein
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I dunno, you tell me. I wasn’t making an argument just answering your dumb ass question.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Ironically, so does your comment. You mean actively and forcibly ejecting refugees.

      The economic vs. refugee character of the people he ejected is unclear AFAIK, though.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Oh, negative morally.

          How does it do that? These were Colombian citizens being moved unwillingly, not refugees.

          • ILikeBoobies
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Saying the president is already unpopular and now he won’t take these people makes it sound like taking refugees would boost his popularity

            Trump however by doing this shows he thinks taking refugees is a bad thing

            Forcibly relocating refugees doesn’t make them no longer refugees, it just makes you (the one relocating them) a bad person/in violation of international law

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be clear, Colombia already backed down and accepted all the demands. Which is unfortunate but not surprising. Starting to get “Just give Hitler what he wants and he’ll stop” vibes. Surprised folks didn’t learn their lesson…

  • Thoven@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even after all these years, I physically cringe every time I read “ReTruths”

  • Krik@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You missed the point where the people were cuffed the whole flight, were dehydrated and transported in military planes like cattle. That’s why those planes were rejected.

    The president send his own jet to get these people back because they are people not cattle.

    • skye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      So he saw these people were transported like cattle, dehydrated and mistreated, and instead of letting them get off the planes, he’s sent them back in those same planes so he can retrieve them with normal planes?

      Unless I am missing something, I feel like you’d want those people to not fly in a plane like that again.

      Either the plane didn’t take off in the first place, case in which rejecting it would make sense.

      Or those planes landed in Colombia, then sent back so they can be brought in proper planes, extending the suffering for no reason.

      • Krik@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        The planes (there were two) landed in Brasil. I don’t know if that’s where they came from in the first place.

        A note: Usually these people are brought back using normal commercial flights. Only this time they used military planes.

        • skye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I see. I thought they landed in Colombia but were sent back to the U.S.

          Thank you for the clarification

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Seems like Trump’s strategy is to now bully countries into getting what they want. "I want them out!!! I want Canada!!! I want Greenland!!!

    He’s basically the equivalent of the kid that flips over the monopoly table when someone bought a property before him.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is the only logical step. You can’t make deals with someone who throws you under the bus at the next opportunity 🤷🏻

      • ryper
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        They should start now. Countries should cut off trading with the US once Trump starts making threats in their direction, instead of waiting for him to make up his mind and do something. He’s too used to there not being any consequences.

        • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s a good idea and countries started that with Russia though it’s still continuing. USA would just follow that model

            • Grapho@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              What do they care about the exchange value if they’re not exchanging anything with the US?

              Adjusted for PPP, the Russian economy is the 4th biggest in the world, experiencing a boom after the start of the war. Largest than any in Europe.

              Everyone knows the USD is artificially inflated and has been for decades, propped up by oil and the threat of violence. Y’all gonna learn when this mother of all bubbles pops.

      • kent_eh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        A growing number of Canadians are already calling for exactly that

        • folaht@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Won’t happen. EU is designed to serve the US, but we’ll see countries breaking off and (re)uniting with Russia.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The problem with that is that anti-Russian sentiment is highest in the East, so there’s no way they will break off.

            Also Russia is not China, they barely have anything to give in a trade relationship. Also, the Ukraine invasion is scrounging up bad memories in most of the member states, so there’s that.

            In Hungary, arguably the country closest ideologically to Russia, EU membership has had a consistent 70-80% approval. They won’t break off.

            Also, the EU is designed to protect EU business interests against international ones, so they will go where the money is, and under Trump, that may cease to be the US.

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He literally is a petulant spoilt brat nappy wearing trust fund kid with unresolved daddy issues.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    If they won’t take them, maybe we could put all these Columbians in some sort of District. A District of Columbia filled with criminals. Wait, we already have that.

  • sirpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Getting married to a Colombian woman as an America. Is this going to hinder her from getting a marriage visa and coming to America with me?

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      With all the executive orders he’s spewing forth, I wouldn’t be surprised if you run into some roadblocks, if only out of confusion on the part of immigration officials. For both your sakes, I hope it isn’t too disruptive. Mazel tov!

    • Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      When did you submit the marriage visa? Also congrats! My wife is also Colombian and these last few days have been a fun time

      Edit: I wish I could supply more information directly, but I am still trying to learn the visa processes. A local immigrant lawyer runs a daily Q&A stream if you want to hop in and see if you can get a slot to ask about your situation. Link: Jim Hacking immigration law. Dood is a good guy who doesn’t bullshit and gets straight to the point. I hope everything goes well for you and your SO

      • sirpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        We are getting married at the notary today so she hasn’t applied for it yet! I am here I Colombia with her so sorry for the late reply. Internet is spotty I will look better when I arrive at her house. Thank you!

        • Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yay! Wishing you both the best. I feel weird promoting a YouTube stream but it’s helping me learn a lot by just listening and hearing people’s stories. I believe the Zoom number and Whatsapp numbers are posted on his page. Looks like today’s is scheduled for 3:30PM COT/UTC -5 and tomorrow’s is 6:30PM COT/UTC -5.

    • Randomgal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You both are getting rounded up for the next flight lmao

    • kent_eh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It certainty make it easier.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It would be a good idea that Mexico, Columbia and other latin countries promote the Trump Wall, but expelling all US residents in their countries. A wall always works in both directions.

    • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      112
      ·
      3 days ago

      A lot of these actually are criminals why should we have to keep them?

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        88
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s really simple if you have a basic, or very tiny, ability to think about it for two seconds. Let’s see if I can help. Criminals being deported are a huge problem for any receiving county, you see, they often don’t have any legal pretext to imprison or arrest them, if they committed crimes in anther nation, it’s unlikely the can collect evidence, or call witnesses to a legal process, also, it’s quite rare to have laws that apply to actions that occurred outside all legaly boundaries. It’s it illegal if an American goes to a county they don’t have documentation to be in, then commit crimes outside the US against other people without any way for the US to detect or prove these actions? So if Colombia has an American who kills dozens of people in their country, and is charged and sentanced to life without parole, and then the decide YEARS after the fact to put them on a plane to LAX and throw them off the plane with no other effort, do you want to let that plane land? That’s fucking insane. The solution to this problem already exists. Instead of being a fascist stupid fuck, you can create an extradition process where we can accept the Colombian legal process and transfer them ourselves to a US prison without dumping serial killers at an airport on their own.

        Being a threatening authoritarian isn’t solving this problem, and thinking every country in the world will simply accept people who have been convicted an sentanced in another nation is fucking stupid. And thinking they can’t manage to exist outside US economic good will it’s also stupid. If he think burning every ally in Latin America is going to hurt them more than us, he’s as dumb as everyone already knows.

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        We don’t actually know what is going on. We had a system that favored protections for people presumed innocent until proven guilty.

        Now Trump is moving so fast with a process that is not transparent and a rhetoric that is hostile and unsympathetic towards all immigrants. People are understandably suspicious that the immigrants were given a fair chance to defend their legal presence in the USA.

        Shit, I won’t be surprised when legal us born citizens get deported in a mix up.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Shit, I won’t be surprised when legal us born citizens get deported in a mix up.

          They’re already rounding up native Americans in these groups. It’s only a matter of time until they start deporting randomly to other countries because ICE was already an incompetent organization and has done that previously numerous times, speeding things up just means more fuckups. Which is of course, the plan. Because it’s not about illegals, or immigrants, it’s about non-whites.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Stop using that label as an excuse to treat people as subhuman.

        The state is rounding up people en masse and shipping them off to a foreign country. This process took a week. Due process is not present. This is some straight-up Nazi shit, and if you can’t at least mutter “fuck that,” then please shut up.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        actually are criminals

        Where was this disdain for criminals at voting time?

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, why shouldn’t we send all Republicans to another country? Or how about those criminals guilty of being Jewish, or black, or gay? Or how about the crime of “looking too Mexican,” like the US did to US citizens during Operations Wetback 1 & 2.

        Also, love how you even say “some of them are criminals,” not all of them. Meaning that you’re okay with gathering up some amount of innocent people and sending them to a different country with nothing more than the clothes on their backs.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          And let’s get this clear, sending someone back to their “home” country without a plan or an actual home to go to should be a criminal act. These people are often productive members of US society who pay more taxes than Aotus. They already have homes and family in the US.

          This is beyond despicable and crosses into the the realm of pure evil.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Basically nobody opposes deporting actual criminals (not political crimes). The problem is that it isn’t the cartel members and bank robbers who get rounded up when a factory is raided. And the mother fleeing persecution is treated the same as the drug kingpin.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Basically nobody opposes deporting actual criminals

          Deportation as a mechanism of punishment for state and federal crimes is generally bad policy. It is excessively draconian (it effectively renders them homeless, unemployed, and indefinitely denied their family and friends for… what? Too many parking tickets? Working construction without a license? Illegally camping?) for some. And entirely too lenient (deporting hardened criminals and cartel leaders like serial rapists or murderers effectively guarantees their release in states that can’t afford to jail them) for others.

          That’s why we’ll often extradite gang leaders into the US from overseas, when the crimes are severe enough. Its also why “sanctuary cities” regularly look the other way for petty offenses in order to avoid the mass economic disruption of ICE interference in municipal matters.

          Injecting immigration penalties into the civil justice system fucks with all the basic functions of local courts and prosecutors. It raises the stakes on minor offenses and gives the worst offenders a get-out-of-jail-free card.

          All that is assuming you even have somewhere to send undocumented criminals. For people who are functionally stateless - migrants who came over as children without papers, refugees from countries that cannot repatriate them or effectively no longer exist, Native Americans who the Feds don’t want to recognize as legal US residents - the ability to deport is little more than Penal Transportation. Nevermind how it routinely violates the 5th and 8th amendment, it mostly just means bribing a small, bankrupt satrap of the US to accept planeloads of random people, often without so much as a proper conviction.

          • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            it effectively renders them homeless, unemployed, and indefinitely denied their family and friends for… what? Too many parking tickets? Working construction without a license? Illegally camping?

            the u, s and a are actually deporting people over misdemeanors?

        • 3dmvr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          41
          ·
          3 days ago

          You’re asssuming they got mothers on this specific flight? I’ve seen nothing about innocents in this flight being posted, are these not straight up criminals on this flight? Can you show me articles I cant find any

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because we’re not entitled to force some other country to take them!

        WTF did you think the answer was‽

      • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah yes, because criminals are subhumans who should be exterminated like the cockroaches they are. And if we can’t take the trash out back like we should we can at least make it not our problem and make sure the cockroaches aren’t in our backyard. That’s what you’re saying right?

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Criminals they forced into the United States” = “Invasion”

    “Repatriation” != “Deportation”

    Repatriation is what happens when you return a POW to their country of origin. Deportation is when you return a criminal to their country of origin.

    POWs are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system. They can be held indefinitely without charges, or returned to their country of origin, without judicial oversight. Since deportation is a judicial process, POWs are not subject to deportation.

    POWs are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of US law; Trump is arguing that the children of “invader-immigrants” can’t be citizens.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        POWs do not need to be charged with a crime. Indeed, under international treaties and laws governing armed conflict, POWs generally can’t be criminally charged for simply participating in hostilities.

        They can be held without charge until the conclusion of hostilities. They are not entitled to the protections afforded to the accused, because they are not accused. They are not entitled to access to the criminal justice system.

        By describing them as “invaders”, he is suggesting that immigrants be treated as enemy combatants.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      The term repatriation is not in any way exclusive to POWs. It was, for example, used extensively during COVID when talking about voluntary repatriation of expats to their home countries.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        True. I should have been more clear: Deportation requires the involvement of the judicial branch. Repatriation has no such requirement. “Repatriation” is a more generic term for returning to one’s country of origin.

        I did not mean to suggest that “repatriation” was exclusive to POWs, and I apologize if I gave that impression. I meant to distinguish between judicial and non-judicial.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Look, I know that immigration is a contentious issue, but sanctioning a country for not repatriating its citizens is a disproportionate response. Trump and Co. are really obsessed with immigration to even do this. It says a lot what values they have.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are those people really Columbian citizens? I would not put it past Trump to just command ICE to land the next plane full of “somehow latin looking people” somewhere south of the border.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I just saw the news that Colombia gave in.

        Trump is going all in. He’s reverting to the 19th century way of strong arming other countries over petty things. He’s reviving the old-school capitalist imperialism.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      He does that to strongarm companies into complying, because it works. It’s also setting an example for other countries to cooperate.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I suppose, but we’re talking about international diplomacy. And a modern one at that.

        Trump’s strong arming sounds so 19th century though. His open threat of taking Panama canal, Canada, Greenland, and renaming the Gulf of Mexico is so manifest destiny.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump’s strong arming sounds so 19th century though

          20th century too! If a government didn’t do what we wanted them to do, we just couped their government, and installed a dictator.

          I mean, how do you think Sadaam Hussein got into power?