Toxic bosses need not post job offers. I would rather work at a McDonald’s…
Oh you sweet summer child…
As someone who spent too many years in fast food the bosses there are extremely toxic, largely due to the fact that it is one of the easiest places to find some nieve replacement for the person who doesn’t want to be on call 24/7 and work unpaid overtime.
It’s not OPs fault they live in an underdeveloped nation, they’re just trying to get by.
“You shouldn’t use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse.”
If people could “divorce” their parents you wouldn’t have to worry about this.
Where I live you can freely use your maiden name or your spouse’s name and switch between them whenever you want.
We didn’t like either of our last names so before getting married I legally changed mine so my Spouse could adopt it after the wedding, instead of both of us legally changing it after the wedding.
They’ll ask the AI what to make then ask the AI to code it and use AI art.
We had that in November
Ah yes, the healthy Democracy of a developed nation…
I was doing a school project about ants and SimAnt had “Ant facts” you could only access during game play. I started a “quick game” so I could write them down and I won the game before I finished with the Ant Facts.
Okay, but as I understand PlayStation and Xbox do not have easily accessible drive ports at all. Or am I mistaken?
Nintendo bad for making QoL console releases? Again, Nintendo is not the only company to do that. PS4/PS5 Pro, the recent Xboxes, etc
Nintendo has a history of doing something different each hardware generation: Snes had the 4 button + shoulder buttons controller. N64 controller was designed for someone with 3 hands, DS had 2 screens, 3DS had 3d without glasses, Wii had motion controls, Wii U the tablet controller, Switch is a console and portable… Every system had something that made it unique. What’s unique about the Switch 2?
Nintendo is not able to compete with other consoles on power, it’s the unique hardware that gives a reason to own it over something else.
They’ve put basically zero effort into shutting down emulators for consoles they don’t sell anymore.
Technically correct. They may not be shutting down emulators, but if they hear a whisper of a ROM for Mappy Land on the NES they have their lawyers on speed dial. ( Me typing that sentence means someone from Nintendo is now watching this thread to see if anyone links to a ROM.)
I’m personally surprised by Nintendo continuing to include user accessible SD cards in their consoles from the DS through the Switch. It becomes incredibly convenient for piracy and I would have thought they were doing it on purpose to at least sell the hardware if it wasn’t for all the evidence you the contrary.
“It doesn’t work when I make no effort to look up the simple solution that would make it work.”
Excuses for what? I still don’t understand what you’re expecting people to do seeing as “not buying the thing” doesn’t seem to be good enough for you.
Do nothing and be rude to the people trying to do something
Got it.
It’s always the “hilariously wrong” people that need to announce they will no longer respond, instead of just not responding.
About a third of Americans bothered to vote against Trump. The remaining 66% are either MAGA or have no problem with it.
Companies will do something if they have a profit incentive to do so. They will not do things if they do not have a profit incentive to do so. People voting with their wallet creates a profit incentive.
So your issue is with launchers then, because that does not describe a monopoly.
You argue like a libertarian, too. As in naming off logical fallacies while completely missing the substance.
I don’t know what makes me a libertarian in your eyes and I don’t care. The point of the discussion has been about Steam being a “monopoly”, and whatever label you apply to me does not discredit my arguments nor distract from the fact that your posts have no substance other than trying to apply a label to me instead of addressing the arguments being made.
If store B is shit, and there isn’t much else, then everyone flocks to store A. Then store A will be a monopoly.
If Store B is shit so everyone flocks to Store A then:
This should be discussed as part of salary expectations. In fact talking about the overall compensation is a recommendation to avoid giving a specific number when asked what salary range you are expecting. (“That depends on other compensation factors such as how much time off I get in a year and medical benefits coverage.”)
Doing this got me an extra $1000 a year as my starting salary at my previous job when their medical benefits were not as good as what I had at the time.