I agree that she is basically a distraction from the real issue. How come there are lawmakers that gives the slightest shit about her opinion? There is the issue.

Not just that. I actually lied when i said that “your” pension is in stocks. It is in fact the current pension for that are retired right now. Unless there are as many younger people working and paying taxes to fund your retirement by the time you’re old enough, you’re not gonna have one.

You are a stock holder. Your entire pension is mainly in stocks, i can guarantee it.

There is a funny story about the real currency of power that involves Stalin. The story goes that Stalin and his party officials came upon a beggerwoman on the side of the road. She asked them if they could spare some money. In a rare moment of generosity from Stalin he went for his wallet, only to find it empty. He asked the officials if they had any money, but all of their purses sounded empty.

Those in power do not need money, as everything they ever want will be given to them.

Faster than anyone can follow? I followed it. Everyone in this thread followed it. It only seemed to be you out of the loop. That’s fine, but you didn’t have to expose your ignorance so publicly. You’ll pick up the lingo eventually.

I find it hilarious that being correct is being ignorant. It’s ok that you’re wrong, it’s your right.

But you do care though, you obviously care.

Of course i do, but since it’s not clear from language that I do due to the reasons that I laid out, I understand that you’re confused. See how language is confusing when words change meaning? Oh, the irony.

You know the old adage “you wouldn’t follow your friend of a cliff if he jumped”.

I think i’d rather use the terms correctly, rather than follow the erronious zeitgeist.

Just because technology has created micro universes where word change meaning faster than anyone can follow, doesn’t mean they are right.

Or to put it more sarcastically so you have something to think about. I literally don’t care, literally.

Thats all well and good. But you’re wrong. Nazi is a type of fascist. Zionist is a different type of fascist.

So by mixing them up you are simplifying in a manner that is reductive and wrong. It would be akin to using maoist and anarchist interchangeably because they are economically “left”.

Perhaps if you studied the history and origins of nazism you’d think differently. When you call people nazis, that really aren’t nazis, then you just rob it of meaning.

The fact that sarcastic irony has twisted the meaning of a word faster during this age than should have been possible, only enforced my belief that the meaning of words are important. Otherwise you end up in a conversation with someone and you end up spending all of the time explaining ‘your’ definition of what a word means.

How would anyone know prepare you? This period is unprecedented in the entire history of the human race. The rate at which technology is changing is making our monkey brains fly off the handle.

We were not evolved for dealing with this much stimulae and attention grabbing. It is realistically and unfortunately taking a toll of collective empathy, world wide. The only thing to do, for your own sake, is to take a digital brake. Go and do things that makes you happy for a while. I’ve luckily never fallen for the alure of the 140 character brainrot, but it is infuriatingly obvious that others have.

Like i said. Some Zionists are fascists, but can’t be nazis. By definition. When you start to throw words around that doesn’t mean what you think they mean, they will eventually stop having any meaning at all.

My “new” favorite dystopian prediction is the one made by David Foster Wallace.

The idea that only deriving happiness and pleasure from virtual things will, in a meaningful way, lead to your own death. Most of infinite jest plays on the theme of losing touch with humanity when pleasure is so easily found through technology.

I would like to throw 1984 in the pile of references that people haven’t actually read.

No, but you might be a bit smarter about adding fuel to a fire.

Ok, just ignore the fact that this kind of shit exasperbate the problem for trans people.

It’s funny you say that. Conservatives are gonna see this sarcastic nonsense and take as literal liberal agenda. Just so you know what you’re feeding.

Is it really this common for people to antropromorphize every animal? Wait until she hears about tortoises, then she can wonder how much it remembers the world wars!

Zionists are fascist, but they aren’t nazis. Hope we cleared that up for you.

Nono. These three “white” people are causing problems.

Don’t try to circumvent what they actually say. Consider what you would feel if it was a picture of Xi, Kim Jong Un and the ayatollah which said: these colored men are the issue.

Fucking hypocrite.

Bolsonaro would like a word.

And the ayatollah

And the Royal family in Saudi Arabia

And most african countries.

But that doesn’t fit the story this OP wants to tell.

So baseless thought. It would be interesting to consider the moral implications of taking money to uphold the law as it is.

I seriously doubt OP had a joke in mind, i think they didn’t check if anyone actually got a reward and really thought no one did.