• radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Right? And also…who needs space between two homes if there are no lawns? Just moosh all the outer walls together.

      Come to think of it…that’s gonna result in a ridiculously long line of houses. Maybe we could moosh roofs and bottom floors and stack 'em up a bit to make the line of houses only a half to a third as long, and then leave a little space between Consecutive House Stacks™️ - y’know, so that there’ll room for more windows.

        • gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s amazing what insulation and proper sound proofing can do. Never lived in thicker walls than here in Germany. Other than the blasted church bells, it’d be hard to convince me I was living next to people if the windows were opaque.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        And why don’t we stick the whole thing underground to further minimize damage to the landscape. Besides it’s way cooler to be called a vault dweller than a condo resident.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 months ago

      Partially, even if you got rid of the lawns the houses would still take up significantly more space for both the road infrastructure as well as the houses themselves.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The way i see it is people prefer to fence themselves from the world in their tiny square, rather than enjoy a larger piece of land they have to share.

  • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If the island were 100 times larger, the houses would take 1% of the land area, leaving 99%. The apartment complex would take up .04%, leaving 99.96%, which isn’t much of an improvement. The proportions of our planet are much closer to my scenario than this made up island. That’s a reason why we might not “prefer apartments in our own town.”

    There are good reasons you might want density, this just isn’t one of them.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but most people don’t live in that other 90% . Most people live in urban and suburban areas where most if not all of the land is privately owned. Because of this the problem shown of fitting 100 households into 25 acres is way more common than your scenario of fitting 100 households on 2500 acres

      • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 months ago

        And having trees and nature near urban venters is very much desirable, to help with air pollution (tho really not a lot), heat concentration and humidity.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If the island were 100 times larger, the houses would take 1% of the land area, leaving 99%.

      Singapore government: if only.

      Also wildlife, carbon capturing, and distance to everything. There’s reason why denser city is easier to go around, in this island, you might not even need a car.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      There is approximately 15.77B acres of livable land and there are 8.2B people so if each person had just 1/4 acre that would be 13% vs if you gave each person 2000 sqft it would only be 2%. Then you need to factor in how to built transit for low density and how many more stores you need due to the lower density and you can see that it would be much better for the environment if we had higher density

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s the difference between America and Western Europe. Western Europe is already mostly built up, they don’t have room. America does.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yea, everything is pretty full here. We have plenty of nature, but there’s always traces of civilization.

        I often miss the vastness of nature. Been to Alaska some years ago and being in nature is an entirely different feeling.

  • iconic_admin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    But then you have to live in an apartment…

    The neighbors kids who live above you will stomp around at 2:00am.

    The neighbors below you will complain when you make the slightest noise.

      • 0x01@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        81
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s really the foundational problem. If you could exist without bugging or being bugged by the neighbors dense housing would be so much more appealing

        • flicker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is absolutely correct.

          I live now in a well-made townhouse. I can’t hear the neighbors, ever, even the living room, or the kitchen. Or the bedroom! I love this place compared to my last crappy townhouse, or any apartment I’ve ever been in, ever.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Unfortunately, where I live it’s very hard to find a well-made apartment or townhouse. I love the idea of an apartment or townhouse where I couldn’t hear the neighbours no matter what they were doing, and I couldn’t smell their cooking, or be exposed to smoke when they’re smoking, and so-on. But, that just isn’t realistic. Even if laws were passed to make that a requirement as of today, it would be decades for the existing housing stock to be sold off.

          • Blooper@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            These threads are full of people making the straight-up weakest arguments for destroying nature…

            “…but privacy and noise!”

            Ugh, just take all that money you would have spent on the ridiculous driveways, extra lengths of road, utilities, and lawn care and put it into higher quality building materials for the apartments/townhouses.

            We build crap quality places in the US and all I hear from my fellow countrymen is “we can’t (or don’t want to) do it any other way”.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          If I could live in the city and never see another person I think I wouldn’t mind it.

          No, wait, still not enough trees or animals or stars in the sky.

          • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That’s why we should build “luxury” apartment blocks in nature with high ceilings and very good noise cancellation, surrounded by agriculture and food forests, ideally growing their own food. Everyone gets a killer view and can quickly go out into nature.

            And then connect these big ass apartment blocks with underground train.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Seriously. Solid concrete apartments are so impervious to noise that the only times i hear any noise other than them dropping anvils on the floor is when it comes through an open window! I’m more annoyed by people in the room next to me than i am by anyone outside the apartment.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        We can’t live in an apartment because it will always have bad insulation. We should all live in single unit housing with… checks the quality of insulation in your average 1970s ranch house oh shit, oh fuck.

        Also, gotta say, love to live in a street level neighborhood Cul-de-sac with that one guy revving his motorbike at 3am. Single pane glass, noisy neighbors, and god help you during July 4th or Jan 1st when someone gets ahold of fireworks.

        But for some reason, we completely forget about this shit when we talk about apartments. Like the suburbs - particularly the corners near intersections or school yards or big churches or highway on-ramps - aren’t routinely noisy af.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Most of my apartment neighbors are actually really cool, chill people. There’s a handful of people who stink, but like… Oh well?? That’s living around other humans? You adapt to the shitty ones and get along with the good ones.

          If you run around assuming all your apartment neighbors will forever be annoying, you’ll never get to know any that aren’t. Same with neighbors in the suburbs. Being around humans can suck sometimes, but if you look you can often find decent people.

            • parody@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Awww surely not!

              Ever heard that quote, paraphrasing the start of it:

              You run into a jerk in the morning, you ran into a jerk.

              (Maybe you know the rest) If you give that some thought for the rest of the week (assuming you’re out and about), interested to hear any thoughts on it :)

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Part of the reason I hate people is I put a ton of effort into trying not to be a jerk, stressing myself out with constant worry from monitoring my behavior at all times, but other people don’t seem to give anyone else the same courtesy.

                And that doesn’t even get into how hard it is for me to relate to almost everyone. I watch weird TV shows, listen to weird music, read weird books, and have weird hobbies. Outside of the weather I don’t really have anything to talk to them about, despite their seemingly constant need for interaction.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I have been to a high-density suburb that is honestly not that far from being the second image, and it was literally so dead quiet that i could reliably use the distant sound of the highway to orient myself.

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            try: Alaska

            you can have trees with people or trees without people, we have train, boats, and airports. Enjoy the tundras full of moss and few people, the largest city in the United States (by area) and the reasonably tall mountains.

      • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The thing is, you can’t really engineer against anti-social behavior. For every better made apartment you will find that there is an even bigger anti-social idiot who still manages to make life hell for their neighbors.

        I’m pretty blessed with my mostly boomer neighbors (🤞) who don’t make a peep after 10PM, but my girlfriend has had some shitty neighbors even though her apartment is pretty well made. Sound insulation between apartments is no match for cigarette and marijuana smoke wafting in from the balcony below any time you want to open the window to air out, or if, heavens forbid, you want to sleep with the window open in the summer, nor does it help much if they are partying and speaking loudly on their balcony until 4AM on weekdays. And then I’m not even getting into how they’re treating shared spaces.

        The proximity makes everything so much worse than it would be with a house, at some point only adding distance helps.

    • CTDummy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’ve lived in shitty apartments but dated two people who lived in “modern” high rise appartments. In mine I heard the neighbours occasionally since they were clearly old motels that they half arsed into units. The modern apartments I practically never heard anyone.

      Though “modern” apartment generally price out people who are up all hours making noise it’s more the fact that these appartments usually have body corporates or people that live on site. Being the typical “up all hours stomping around” type would be a quick way to have your lease terminated.

      Edit: Duh and the super obvious thing I forgot, improved sound insulation in modern apartments I imagine as well.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Concrete framed buildings help a lot with this. Other noise proof options are out there as well

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        My favorite is a few hundred meters of trees with a fence and stone walls

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      This has literally been a non-issue for me in every apartment I’ve lived in for the last 10 years here in Sweden. You probably need some better building codes, this is a solved problem.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        this is a solved problem

        LOL no, it’s a solved problem where you are

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          so you’re agreeing it’s a solved problem then, just that wherever you live is refusing to implement it.