No.

Examples, please.

Current LLMs aren’t sentient, and we’re at least one breakthrough away from building something that’s sentient.

Why?

This makes me wonder, what about promt injection. I’m not aware of a reliable way to protect against prompt injection.

Brian Thompson had a copy of the Epstein files, and somehow those make people die by suicide.

Who are “they”?

The reward mechanism in the brain is triggered when you bet. I think it also triggers a second time when you do win, but I’m not sure. So, yeah, sometimes the LLM spits out something good, and your brain rewards you already when you ask it. Hence, you probably do feel better, because you constantly get hits dopamine.

But if you enter Quill form, your helmet gets melded. On the plus side, the car will be struck by the quills.

I kinda can’t get over how hubristic this desire to create a perfectly obedient superintelligence is. Even if it were remotely feasible right now, you won’t be able to control it.

You’d have to be clairvoyant to have known that in 1997, though. And if you’re clairvoyant, casinos offer a better return on investment.

That’s already a rimworld mod.

So, you

• have an at time of writing 19 day old account,
• make bold claims
• react with hostility when asked to justify said claims.

That’s not the behavior I’d expect from a rational adult.

Critical thinking mostly.

Could I see the data your claims are based on?

Yes. A surprising number of people can nominate people for the noble peace prize. This isn’t like the Oscar, where a nomination is already an achievement.

What to do when you have a tailgater behind you:

1. Foot off the gas.
2. Wait until the tailgater tries to overtake you.
3. PIT maneuver.
4. Keep driving safely.

The problem here isn’t that the games are bad, it’s that people are being taken advantage off. A lot of effort goes into making these games as enticing to spend to spend money as possible, which leads to people spending more money on them than they can afford. Vulnerable people are being taken advantage off, and that’s not okay.

It’s not really passive income, though. You have to get people in there and interview them. Even if you just spend 10 minutes per applicant, that’s already 600 minutes, or 10 hours. So yes, this is a decent hourly wage, at least until word gets around about what you’re doing, which it will, because what kind of job interview is done in 10 minutes? Not one where you actually have a chance.

And yes, I do realize this post is most likely a joke. Still fun to reply to, though.

No, it’s okay to keep your head down.