• WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wait until you see the magic roundabout in the UK. It’s a “close your eyes, pray and hit the gas” type of place.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not everybody is cut out to drive (i.e. to operate dangerous heavy machinery in a fast-changing environment with others depending on you handling the situation correctly). The problem is when we structure our societies requiring everyone to do so to participate.

    • uhmbah
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      requiring everyone to do so to participate.

      Bus, taxi, bike, walk, whatever.

      I vehemently disagree that everyone has a ‘right’ to have a license, as so many argue.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        They never said that everybody has a right to drive. The reality is that, at least in the US and similarly planned countries, cars are priced like a luxury and treated like a necessity by the powers that be. Anything that isn’t driving a car is an afterthought.

      • Jerkface (any/all)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        This is what I do. It is not a universal solution. You are sugar coating your answer by leaving out the final option that makes it universal: give up.

        My partner wants to be a social worker. They are quite talented in their profession and help a lot of people. They are not a good driver and it would be better for everyone if they did not have to drive. However, you cannot do the work they do unless you own a car, have a valid license, and are willing to drive around. The choice offered to them is: drive poorly, or give up your life’s ambition.

        @AllNewTypeFace is exactly correct that there is a problem where we have structured society such that everyone is expected to drive, and your comment does not successfully refute that. The problem exists.

        • BCsven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s not as binary as “drive or give up life’s ambition”. Uber exists, busses (maybe not in USA and some areas of Canada). Still we are setup as car-centric and it sucks

          • Jerkface (any/all)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Yes, actually, it is. Sometimes, for some people with some perfectly ordinary ambitions, those are the only two options. It is absolutely binary.

            Uber and busses are not solutions for people who need to move their clients around, for example. Even if it were remotely practical to attempt it, even if it were safe for their clients, it’s simply not permitted.

            If you’ve never run into a situation where you had to give things up because you don’t have a car, that’s extremely fortunate. To claim no one ever does is wildly delusional.

            • BCsven
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              I gave up my car. I bus to clients. I understand there are circumstances where it may not be always be the case but there are handy transit out here for moving clientswhoo need support, and other services. I have even seen US shows documenting social work where they use taxis.

              • Jerkface (any/all)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                I gave up my car. I bus to clients. In our professions, we had that option. Other people in other professions and other localities don’t. My partner has to be able to transport vulnerable individuals like foster children with trauma as part of their career. Obviously we could design things in such a way that there are other options, but we haven’t. Sometimes people can fill in or work around those gaps. Some times, it is not possible, for example with my partner. Fuck off now, you’re just being deliberately obtuse.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      “if I randomly stop in the middle of the road so another car can get in, the car right behind me probably won’t hit me”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Cyclist here.

        Someone did that for me, so I tried to rush across the street to not hold up traffic.

        Woke up a few weeks later in physical rehab, not remembering anything because of the TBI. Evidently I was in the hospital for about three weeks. No recollection!

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Oh God I love that its just so hulaeuosly dumb when it happens

      I just put my hands in the air and yell at them

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Some larger roundabouts work that way. Most (in)famously the arc de triomphe in Paris.

      Where I live there are two of these

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Broke: Car C is being a responsible, safety focused driver

    Woke: Car C is holding up traffic for no good reason

    Bespoke: Car Pink is whipping around that turn at 80 kmph and going to kill everyone anyone, so don’t sweet it.

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hate getting stuck behind the “I won’t move until there are no cars anywhere on the planet” drivers.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    I knew a girl who was instructed to turn left at a roundabout, so she proceeded to turn left when merging into the roundabout.

    Poor girl, fortunately everything was fine (she did fail, but no accidents) but that’s a special kind of ‘too literal’ that loops back around to being dumb.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      And that’s why turn-by-turn navigation systems phrase it as “take the third exit from the roundabout” these days.

      • gnu@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        One of the work trucks used to have one that said “Go straight through the roundabout”. It was pretty tempting sometimes to take it at its word…

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love roundabouts as a driver and as a pedestrian. I do admit that the double laned ones can feel like an utter cluster at times though

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      you aught to try the kind that’s 3 lanes going to 5 different places and a tram running through the middle!

      (this was the most dangerous intersection in my city for a while… they’ve added traffic lights… i do also very much love roundabouts)

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah I’m a fan.

      My city has no traffic lights. Roundabouts everywhere. It’s not a particularly big city.

      There are some problems but in general I think everyone gets where they’re going a lot quicker.

  • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    When you can’t see over the middle circle, I’m also approaching roundabouts very slowly because some morons tend to play Tokyo drift. And blinking is anyway not a thing here :(

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Replace the pink car with a bicycle an A is suddenly not being in the mood to yield anymore.

    I was going straight once and had to go back in and do a full turn (180° + 360°) because of that.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      All cars will yield to a bicycle in the UK, because less protected members of the road traffic always take priority.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        All cars should yield.

        When I used to cycle, I’d just go on the pavements at large roundabouts. Not much point in being right but dead.

        • Aux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I personally never had any issues. British drivers are very polite and cautious.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Welp, I’m not in the UK.
        Over here, people go with - what is the most threatening to themselves - and it really feels weird that people who have presumably passed the driving exam are worse at roundabouts than me.

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’m a daily cyclist and I think I’d be terrified to bike through a full roundabout. They’re absolutely marvelous designs for throughput that doesn’t require complex signal automation, but the flip side of that is they’re pretty hostile if you’re not a motor vehicle. Any truly good roundabout design should include pedestrian and cycle paths along the periphery that have priority when crossing the circles entrances.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        On the other hand, I am not expecting a cycle path for me when I am going around the normal road speed. Just if people start understanding the cycles are also traffic and not something to be plo’d over.

        But that’s not the thing either. It feels like people are just playing a game of ‘chcken’ all over the place.

  • rothaine@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Alternative scenario: C starts entering, A decides to FUCKING FLOOR IT, slams into C

  • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The hard part is when back to back traffic for 15 miles worth of cars is coming from one direction and everyone else is either too scared to zipper merge or they allow the one direction to have perpetual right of way.

    At some point of heavy traffic, the circle right of way must yield for zipper merging, else face my ass aggro merging and beeping at everyone who doesn’t.

  • Gurei@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    When I have a Car D behind me, it’s because they overestimate my car’s acceleration capabilities.