• vegantomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    In my opinion, the worst part about new cars is that they are essentially tracking devices and some of them can be remotely controlled.

    Any suggestions on how to get a car that doesn’t track you and was built post-2010?

    • redwater@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Mazda MX5. I have a 2019 and it’s simple. Heated seats, blindspot mirrors, backup camera, led headlights. Absolute joy to drive.

      No other tech that tracks you as far as I’m aware.

      • Venator@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why do you think it doesn’t track you? It has voice recognition in the infotainment, so it has microphones. I guess it probably won’t have mobile data connection since they require you to connect your phone or take it to a dealer for infotainment updates. So might be safe as long as you don’t allow it to use your phone data when its connected via Bluetooth or do over the air updates or take it to a dealer for repairs/updates.

        I’m not sure if car manufactures do it yet but samsung is known to require data dumps before providing spare parts for phones to 3rd party repair shops, so maybe car manufactures could do that as well?

      • vegantomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Thanks for the suggestion, it looks promising. MX5 has only 2 seats, but maybe one of the larger models is good too.

    • Justagamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is a website that you can opt out of having certain data tracked.

      But I imagine insurance companies will use it as an excuse to raise your rates if you opt out

      • vegantomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        There is also the issue of companies pinky-promising that they won’t track you but still call home.

        But if no other alternatives are available, this is good to know.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I love the potential of a digital dash.
    I hate the wasted potential of actual digital dashes.

    Let me fuckin customize it.
    Let me put whatever gauges I want wherever I want. I know that the data is available over the CAN bus, let me fuckin see it.
    Dynamically change the layout if something important happens I need to keep an eye on, but wouldn’t normally need to worry about

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      My Audi typically displays the outdoors temp on the digital dash, which is convenient. Except when there is any warning light on, which takes its place. Want to take a quick glance at the temp? Well right now it’s “low on windshield wiper fluid” degrees outside.

      Also why the fuck does this shitty dash scream at me about warnings when I get in the car but not out. By the time I get home I will have completely forgotten about the windshield wiper. How is “also display reminders after shutting the engine off” not the obvious implementation?

    • vithigar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 days ago

      Even more infuriating when not only is it not customisable, but they layout they do use is just… bad in a thousand different tiny ways.

      For example, the tachometer and speedometer on my vehicle have two display modes. The traditional looking dials and a more compact vertical wheel that leaves more room in the middle of the display for other things.

      …but those other things are almost always either useless (I don’t need to see a little picture of the vehicle I’m driving), or actively worse (the media info screen actually shows fewer characters in the larger mode).

      It’s not unusable, it’s just varying levels of awkward or useless in dozens of little aspects.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      My Seat Leon has a digital dashboard, by pressing the “VIEW” button on the steering wheel it rotates between several different layouts, which can be customized.

      I normally just have two normal dials, with a GPS map in the middle, fuel gauges to the left (because the standard place doesn’t line up properly) and a media display to the right (shows what song/podcast is playing and the progress of it)

      I can make my entire dash be a giant GPS map display, with only a small digital speedometer readout, but that is annoying.

      These new digital dashboards offer plenty of customizations, but the formfactor should be the same as a normal dash

      • PeriodicallyPedantic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Some can, especially aftermarket ones. But it’s usually not simple and usually OEM don’t offer a lot of customization options.

  • Slovene@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, the top one sparks gasoline. And the bottom one sparks … I don’t know how electric cars work.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Touch screens have no business in dashboards. I don’t care how sleek it looks to replace all the physical buttons. You have to look at a touch screen to use it. That alone makes them entirely unfit for the purpose. Physical buttons that can be identified by touch and provide tactile feedback are the only interfaces that make any fucking sense at all.

    This fees like something so obvious that I cannot understand how we got here.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Hard disagree. It is SO much faster for me to read a digital number readout than a analogue one.

    This isn’t touch screen controls (which are terrible). It’s a readout.

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I will never put a light mode display in my car. I will take an analogue dial over something that burns spots into my retinas when I’m trying to drive. Even with dark mode, the amount of ambient light coming off that thing is gonna bother me at night.

      We need to downgrade everybody’s headlights while we’re talking about personal preference too. If the car behind me has lights that are so bright they cast a shadow over my own headlights, they’re too bright.

    • Justagamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah I thought since I’m old I’d be like gimme the old way, but I would actually prefer simplicity for regular commutes.

      But I feel like not even car companies want me to have simplicity so they can monetize more doodads

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Depends on the screen. I like the dull matte screen on those citroën picassos.

  • JayDee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 days ago

    I am partial to the windshield projection style. It is truly fantastic for keeping your eyes on the road while seeing your speed

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Civic’s split dash was apparently generally hated, but I really liked it, for just that reason… The year after mine they switched it back to a single cluster, which I think is unfortunate

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh my SIL had one of those for a while, it looked pretty nice.

        Our Mazda projects the speed, cruise control status, and icons for vehicles next to us on the windshield. It really is very nice - one of the few things about that car that I actually like.

        • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          What are the things that you don’t like? I’m in the market for a new (used) vehicle and Mazda seems to top a lot of charts for the past several years but I’ve never driven one.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s not a bad car for what it is, but I find it slow, uncomfortable, and annoying to drive. I don’t need a screeching alarm going off after it misinterprets a situation. The entertainment system has several bugs in it.

            It handles well, and it does get good fuel mileage.

            I wouldn’t have bought it in the first place, but my wife wanted something smaller than our Accord, and she basically only drives that vehicle.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I was so happy when I saw some modern KIAs use analog controls.

      Then I checked KIAs reliability and safety score and died.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’ve put 80k miles on one Kia and just got a Hyundai with 100k miles on it. I’ve not once had something need replacement that wasn’t an expected wear item at about the expected interval. I also witnessed a Kia get pinned against the median on the beltline by a speeding car that lost control and while it was definitely totaled, the occupants were uninjured.

        So my annecdotal experience has been quite positive

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    watching 80s and 90s anime has given me a soul-deep admiration for mechanical dials of any kind. I like high-tech shit, but it’s gotta have low-tech dials, or I’m out.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    5 days ago

    I get having a digital cluster, because you can display way more information than using analog gauges.

    Put it in front of the driver.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also, make the text bigger.

      So many displays have tiny, hard to read text that could easily be twice as tall and wide without even impacting the blank space that separates them.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Heh, it’s not digital, but our pickup has small km/h speeds printed on the speedometer, like most cars. But when I was driving in Canada, I found they were nearly illegible (my eyes just weren’t good enough to read the small print). I had to switch to the digital speed display in the dash so I could read my speed in km/h.

  • spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Honestly I’d kill for a digital dashboard that easy to read. Most are way worse.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    I guess I’m in the minority: I prefer to see my speed as a number instead of a dial.

    Yes, it does need to be in front of the driver.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      An advantage of a proper dial is that you can instinctively see the change in speed by how quickly the needle moves.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Different people have different considerations.

        When I’ve rented vehicles with a digital speedometer I haven’t felt like I’m missing anything without a dial. I haven’t found myself in situations where the movement of the needle helps me.

        When I get into rental cars with a dial, I feel like I need to watch it closely because I’m not familiar with where the ticks are. It doesn’t work for me at all.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I have absolutely felt like I am missing something when I don’t have a dial, I like having a tool get a general idea of how fast my speed it changing, rather than having to focus on a number to see how fast that is changing.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Also, range. You don’t even need numbers on the RPM dial to know it pointing past 12-o-clock is not good.

      • SeekPie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The Citroen C4 had a the speed right under the windshield which was a lot easier to read than a analog speed gauge in the dash.

        A picture:

        6740

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I feel like this debate is about the concept of a seepometer as a simple number vs a speedometer as a dial.

          Your claim that this speedometer was a lot easier easier to read than a normal dashboard, leaves out a bit, that is dependent on what situation we are talking about. In normal driving, I find the dash perfectly easy to read, this concept you have shown be seem to be lacking color coding which would make warning lights less distinct.

          One of the best features in modern cars is when they have a HUD, that is fantastic.

    • ChouxFleur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Renault have been doing this for ages. I had a 2009 Mégane which gave the speed as a digital number. Fuel and oil temps were bars to either side. Revs was a physical dial.

      It was such a great car, just a shame about the engineering…

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Before I bought a new car, I assumed digital speedometers would be available as a setting, not apparently not.

        It’s the kind of thing that I didn’t realize I wanted until I had to deal with the alternative.

    • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Chevy 15-seaters from 2012+ you can turn the status screen on the dash and display numerical rpms. They are a bit slow to update but it’s kinda cool.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t understand how anyone can buy a Tesla. The lack of a dashboard + the only interface being a tablet alone are a deal breaker for me.

    You’re being sold a feature that is really just massive cost cuttings playing impostor as a luxury feature at a premium with 100x worse usability.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      And on top of that, at any moment, they (Tesla) can remove pretty much any feature they feel like in a push update, which they have done… Personally, I think removing existing features from already sold products should be illegal, flat out