Probably that I’m pedantic, periodically.
(The irony being that it’s using the loose definition rather than the literal definition of “periodically”, although it’s still in the dictionary)
He isn’t wrong. Your bucket of bolts is gonna rattle tf apart on that road.
No matter how much pasta you make, you’re obligated to eat it in a single sitting.
This is the way.
This is the way I die.
I only see one title and one post body; what happens if 3 people share the same link but with 3 different titles and description bodies?
Do they get merged, does one get arbitrarily selected, or does this only work on posts with identical link+title+body?
I’m pretty happy with Voyager. It’s not perfect but it’s good
Can confirm. Grew up just down the road
I grew up just a few minutes down the road from there! Had a friend who lived on That street.
I love whenever I see this pop up every few months or lol.
Kinda.
Ignoring the pedantic take that nearly every website is a saas.
And the slightly less pedantic take that every interactive website is a saas
If your website is an app that does a thing that a user wants, it’s a saas.
Your website just does mpeg to gif transcoding? That’s a saas.
Online text editor? SaaS.
Online tamagotchi? SaaS.
If it doesn’t scale to the number of users who want or need to use it, then it’s not a very good SaaS. But SaaS it is.
What makes it “working”, is that the Software part of Software as a Service, is available as a Service.
The service doesn’t have to scale to a million users. It’s still a SaaS if it has one customer with like 4 users.
Is this a pedantic argument? Yes.
Are you starting a pedantic fight about the specific definition of SaaS? Also yes.
Lol they don’t need scaling and redundancy to work. They just need scaling and redundancy to avoid being sued into oblivion when they lose all their customer data.
As a full time AI hater, I fully believe that some code-specialized AI can write and maybe even deploy a full stack program, with basic input forms and CRUD, which is all you need to be a “saas”.
It’s gonna suck, and be unmaintainable, and insecure, and fragile. But I bet it could do it and it’d work for a little while.
I hope this is satire 😭
You can never trust Big Number.
They keep trying to make laws without going through Congress or the Senate.
But they were still users who were active in that half-year, so even when they went offline it shouldn’t have resulted in a dip
This is a boomer ass take
This graph doesn’t make sense to me. The drops on the two graphs shouldn’t line up, right? Make me sus
That’s a very reddit thing to say
Ah makes sense.
I wasn’t even concerned about the low priority of passenger cars. I meant the physical condition of the track itself, and the resulting reduction in top speed along many section in the maritimes.
A good time 😏