

Apologizing doesn’t affect their guilt or lack thereof.
Canadians are allowed self defense within reason
Apologizing doesn’t affect their guilt or lack thereof.
Canadians are allowed self defense within reason
That’d be a really great point, if that was even anywhere close to what I said in the comment that got down voted.
So what am I to take from this reply? That people on Lemmy are functionally illiterate? That they can’t distinguish between criticism of an example with criticism of an argument?
Ah I see. That makes a bit more sense.
But I still don’t think that’s a great company the example, because I believe what they were actually saying was that just because it contains a see doesn’t make it a fruit, in the same way that if you see a shelled peanut with the husk on, you wouldn’t call it a whole fruit.
I know they’re wrong, but I don’t think that your counter example addressed what their confusion was.
Not admitting guilt doesn’t make you not guilty
Lucked into it, kinda.
I wanted to be an industrial designer, but there are only a few schools that offer that degree in my country and I didn’t get in, because I didn’t have the illustration skills.
My fallback (a close 2nd) was to go into engineering, so that’s what I initially went to university for. But I struggled with the calculus.
During my time in engineering, we had to take a programming class, and I was really good at it (compared to my engineering classmates). So I switched my major from engineering to computer science.
I graduated with my degree in computer science and I’ve been a coder ever since (last 15 years or so)
An apple contains many seeds, but you don’t call each seed a fruit.
I mean, I knew a strawberry wasn’t a berry, but your counterexample was completely irrelevant.
Edit:
When people downvote but nobody responds, I have no idea what people are downvoting about.
Nothing I said was inaccurate, and it illustrated why their example was inapplicable, so what do downvotes mean here?
No, I understand the need for laws around it, for people’s safety.
But the restrictions seem excessive, since it seems likely that there are only a few options for disposal that a funeral director can be licensed to do, rather than training them on what makes something un/safe and letting them use their judgement.
And strange that they basically made laws that say you must use this private industry. If you’re going to legislate that a particular service must be used, then that service should be a public service. But now we’re getting off topic lol.
Nope, it’s like fish.
Damn it, Princess Georg
I probably should have said “safely” rather than just “sanitary”, I was thinking about water burials and ground water contamination when I said that.
And also just like… Leaving the body out in a public area.
As long as you’re not putting people in danger, and you’re not disrespecting the deceased, what would be illegal?
I wonder, if you could throw the chunks around safely without sanitation issues, would it be illegal if that’s what the person wanted? Is it defiling a corpse if thats what they wanted done?
That’s kind of what I meant by sanitary. Idk what the appropriate word would be. “Safe” I guess?
I didn’t realize that there were any illegal ways to dispose of a body, as long as it’s in their will and sanitary
That entirely depended on how 1337 you were 😬
This is absolutely not the reason, because even back then when we started doing it, we did it on ICQ, MSN, etc. those chats didn’t have length restrictions, and typing was easy on a keyboard.
Armed with my screwdriver
Life is never a bore
I study and research
Data galore
Nothing can stop me
Accolades and more
Now let me prop open
The Demon Core
This is a red, beige, and green checkered flag.
I’m kinda surprised that people are so offended by a homescreen that they’re downvoting.
Do you not like my arrangement? Or is there something about live tiles themselves (what? They’re just like widgets)? What is it that has you downvoting over something so benign?
Taste? I’m talking about behaviour