He lied to his wife, but surely he won’t lie to me, his wife.
I never thought leopards would eat MY face…
At some point every person who enters a relationship in this way realises that they have generated absolute proof that their committed partner is utterly open to infidelity to the point of separation.
Sounds like the position of Mistress is now open.
Is everyone too distracted by the cringe to be infuriated at the punctuation? Wtf is happening with those quotation marks?
I was too distracted by the punctuation to really care about the cringe.
I read it 3 times trying to figure out where the quote was supposed to be before I gave up and came to the comments.
In my case, YEP.
Welcome to the 1950s. They used quotes to make it clear it was the pictured character saying that. They also standardized using quotes to identify the motto on businesses and trucks. The SomeECards meme format is a caricature of that.
Bill’s Burgers “We serve pleasure”
Jack’s towing “Reliable hookers”
Manny’s Milk “We’ll deliver that white cream that puts a smile on your wife’s face”
The use of a pretend quote is one thing, but what is the middle quotation mark doing?
Manny’s Milk “We’ll deliver that white cream” that puts a smile on your wife’s face"
He cheated to get her, he’ll cheat to get the next one.
She believes he’ll be loyal to her cause she dedicates all of her time to him. She’s a bit delusional to say the least…
And he will be, until the next opportunity presents itself.
how anyone can be this short-sighted is beyond me
If someone will cheat with you, they’ll cheat on you.
This is a great slogan but it’s not an absolute. It’s definitively based on an emotional response to a feeling of betrayal, and while I can agree that it’s likely in most scenarios, I really do wish people wouldn’t just spout it as if it is a defining characteristic of every cheating party in history.
The recurrence rate of cheaters cheating again is staggering.
Do you want a solutions based conversation or an emotionally supportive one. Because my point isn’t about the recidivism rates of cheaters but about the fact that labels hurt any and all conversations involving them by smothering the flow of conversation. Meaning someone who is in a situation that might lead to cheating will not seek or is not likely to get advice that would mitigate such behavior.
You sound like someone who has cheated.
At the risk of sounding like i must be a cheater myself, are you suggesting that once someone cheats they are no longer a human worthy of empathy and nuanced consideration of circumstances?
Certainly not true 100% of the time, but absolutely worth keeping in mind, especially if one is naive or emotionally immature.
People who go to prison are more likely to re-offend by an exorbitant rate in America. This is because the system is set up to make them fail. Do you want to be the change in the world you want to see or do you want to set people up to fail by making the entire topic completely one-sided and vilifying everyone involved.
Adultery used to be a criminal offense.
Are you trying to say that society is designed to make men cheat? Really?
Yeah, you’ve definitely cheated before
It’s pretty damn close to being an absolute. As someone who has never been involved in an adulterous relationship in any form, I would never get with someone who has cheated. They have shown they are absolutely willing to violate an intimate partners trust, lie about it, and leave them (likely with little to no guilt). If they can do it once, they can, and likely will, do it again.
Passionate love and Companionate love are two different things. And passionate love never lasts forever. If you’re with someone who is willing to cheat to find that passionate love, then when it dies with you, they are likely to go on to the next short term passionate love.
If you want to make the argument that someone cheated in a relationship with an abusive partner, there are still substantial red flags there. Without showing how they’ve made great strides to be a different person (therapy, self improvement, etc) I can’t see them being a trustworthy long term partner. And there is no way someone could have made those improvements if they went from one partner immediately to the next.
eh, it is a sign of character, I think it’s safe to assume. it’s on them to prove otherwise to be honest.
“It’s funny she called ME a thief, but now SHE doesn’t have a car and I do. Maybe I should have been called the ‘owner’ all along.”
“They all called ME the spectre of death, but…”
Until he finds a new mistress
Accounting he only had one on the go at a time.
Besides the “meme” being cringe inducing garbage at a similar level to ‘live, laugh, love’. Just seems like copium or self aggrandising.
I guess she has to cope somehow since it has not even been a year since they got married and they already had a huge fight. She complained about his kids staying over at their house (ex wife has them for 2 weeks, then he has them for 2 weeks) cause she hates kids & doing stuff for them; and he got very angry and essentially told her to get the fuck out if she doesn’t like it cause she knew what she was signing up for and to never talk badly about his children again cause they come before her. She truly dreamed that after he divorces he’ll drop his entire family and start a brand new life with her.
Your sister sounds immature. Might help if she did therapy or even a self help book.
Going to take a lot of therapy to therapy the cunt part of her away
Wow, I knew she wouldn’t be the brains of any operation but I didn’t think I’d be siding with the cheating douchefuck so completely. Like, she’s really got those premium blinders on to think all that, damn. Unless he had said he’d leave it all but at that point I don’t believe either of them enough to make any judgement or assumption.
I also didn’t think I would be on the cheating husband’s side but good for him standing up for his kids. I’ve seen far to many fathers drop their kids for their new girlfriend/wife.
Fucking pathetic
Ah. The blissful happy ending that they both deserve. Thank you for sharing.
Are people not allowed to have a huge fight until after 1 year in the relationship?
Fights happen. A relationship that never fights is unrealistic and a problem. This insinuates to others that fighting in the first year is bad or wrong, and that’s just not necessarily true.
Fights happen for sure. But the reason? She has no fore thought.
It’s like you read the first sentence and then stopped
I think what OP was pointing out was the severity of the fight, and the way that it has illustrated fundamentally different expectations of this new relationship so soon – not just that there has been a fight within the first year because you’re right, disagreements are normal and usually healthy.
A relationship that never fights is unrealistic and a problem
I’m not sure how you define “fight.” For me (and probably many others), it conjures an image of
violencehostility.A lot of people in relationships resolve disagreements through discussion. If a partner were unable to discuss an issue without shouting (or worse), they wouldn’t remain my partner. Point is, being able to resolve issues in a mature way is a basic requirement for many relationships.
I know that isn’t everyone’s experience though. I can only imagine how much crap you’ve been through for “relationship fights” to feel so normal. I’m sorry, that has to really suck. :(
Edit: Changed some words. Also, I’m truly surprised that this many people seem to think that shouting at a partner is normal/healthy.
In a marriage/committed partnership, I think most people would consider a fight to be an argument with raised voices and some ill feeling. I really don’t think most people consider shouting to be violent. Upsetting, maybe, but violent?
Fair enough. But do most people really think it’s healthy to shout at their partners when they disagree over something? I’m kind of shocked at how many people are voting as if that’s a normal expectation in a relationship.
No, of course it’s not healthy. I’m just saying it’s not violent.
Most home wreckers are self aggrandizing hypocritical narcissists, so… yeah.
Pretty sure memes like that are always intended to be taken as satire. They used to be a quite popular format.
I mean it doesn’t seem like his sister thinks it’s satire. Poes law etc
When a man marries his mistress he creates a job opening.
Once a cheater, always a cheater.
People say this phrase as a form of copium as well.
What possesses people to use a word as dumb as “copium”?
The word itself is actually a pretty good slang to describe the common act that human beings do known as coping, which can also paired with the funny meme of someone actually huffing a substance called copium like it was a potent drug. Let’s be real, some people have the bliners on so thick with denial and do mental gymnastics so hard to protect themselves from unpleasant ideas that may damage their ego or mindset that they may as well be high on something fierce. I’m usually the one criticizing new unnecessary words I think are stupid but I like this one better than most others.
Notice how toward the beginning of your comment you said in a non-cringey way? I prefer that.
What a very specific “meme”.
Some people here don’t really understand memes
Wow, your sister is a real homewrecking piece of shit. She also doesn’t understand that if he’ll cheat on his ex with you, he’ll cheat on you with someone new.
Why are there three instances of " ?? Where is the fourth one? Make it make sense.
This is a precise punctuation zone.
We only allow the use of a single “?” here.
Please correct before continuing on your way, sir.
⁇
He was searching it too and found a woman
