• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    is 8GB a lot?

    8Gb install file? No. 8gb log file? Can be. 8Gb of customer PII dumped from your database? Absolutely

  • Johanno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I always thought it would be funny running an os from an usb stick.

    Never would I have thought that there would be storage in the size of a stick exceeding the default configuration of a desktop pc.

    2 TB in one small nvme drive?! Wtf. Amazing but also crazy.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Something I was able to do with my old OnePlus 3 phone, was use it as a Linux USB. It was a pretty neat trick!

      It was really convenient to just snag a work laptop and boot it into Puppy Linux (which lives entirely in RAM) to browse around and such without my job looking too closely and being creepy about it.

      Disclaimer

      IT departments are various kinds of chill, scrutinizing, lazy, or pathologically psycho, YMMV greatly. Try at your own risk. Lol

    • epicstove
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      When my dad first saw an nvme drive he had to triple check what he was looking at BC in his old 70s computer brain there’s no fucking way something so small and unmoving can hold so much data, read/write it so fast, and all for a relatively cheap price.

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember being thrilled to move from floppies to a 16mb flash drive for my school assignments, even if I did have to constantly download and reinstall the USB Mass Storage drivers for the Windows 1998 sp2 computers in the library which reset every night. And the transfer speed was SLOW.

      The fact that you can get a terabyte flash drive now, which can hold 62,500 of my school assignment drives, is mind blowing to me.

      • MDCCCLV
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I always wanted the zip drives with 250mb capacity.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Those were pretty cool. My dad had a single one in a hard plastic case, I want to say it was like 100 MB or something? I loved how chunky and solid it was.

          I do feel like it’d be cool to have a storage medium that at least feels like that again. Like sliding a big hot-swappable SATA SSD into a slot and getting a satisfying “kaCHUNK” and a little busy light.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            At the very least that sounds like a good use for the front slots in a modern computer case, as you said allow hot swapping and it’d be a pretty good system for games in particular.

  • thelosers5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Generally there’s a reverse relationship between size and speed. A 8gb cache would also be super slow thus defeating the purpose of the cache. If it were so easy every cpu would have a huge cache

    • MDCCCLV
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not really, if you’re putting that size on the physical chip it will be fast because it’s close by. It’s just that we can’t fit that much on a chip now.

      • thelosers5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Unfortunately that’s not how it works. This is coming from someone who studied computer hardware and software in university.

        Cache sizes are a trade off. Small cache means quick access speeds but higher chance of a cache miss. Larger caches have a lower access speed but a lower chance for a cache miss.

        This is why we have different levels of cache on a computer actually. It allows us to harness the benefits of the different sizes of caches without impacting the speed as much. With multiple layers we can have small caches that are super fast and then larger caches that are slower and so and so forth. This way we can have both speed and size.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          For one, I’m just happy to see a hardware stat that isn’t rapidly and constantly enlarging for no other reason than being incrementally released to pressure constant sales.

          I mean it’s a small thing, but neat! I did wonder why cache sizes tended to stay small even between generations.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          There’s nothing about being larger that makes access speed inherently slower. We just have to use cheaper technologies to improve density. CPU cache is usually SRAM, which is less dense than DRAM, but faster. 1GB of SRAM would be god tier. Even the Ryzen X3D chips only have 96MB of L3 cache, all SRAM, and those are sick.