• Moneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      If Kamala lost the election because she wasn’t in support of Palestine then why didn’t she just support Palestine?

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 minute ago

        Maybe make your one issue election about your country and not others? And I mean if you really cared about Palestine, you wouldn’t have stood off to the side and let Trump through, cause now you’ll get to watch the complete annihilation of Palestine, and even more of your tax dollars will go towards the genocide

    • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Of course they are! The non-voters and 3rd party voters did exactly what they said they’d do to free Palestine and now It’s all flowers and hugs as far as the eye can see over there!

      Don’t mind the big sign in right in the center of their city that reads “Future Site of Giant Crater”, that’s nothing at all to worry about. Just focus on all the hugs!

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    When you lose an election this badly, people are clearly not buying you’re selling.

    But damn I did not expect so many people to sit out against the guy who did the coup and amongst all the other shit. If there is any light ahead, I think it’s that this L forces the Democratic Party to lean back left with their campaign promises, and whatever power they have left to affect policy.

    • SimplyTadpole@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If there is any light ahead, I think it’s that this L forces the Democratic Party to lean back left with their campaign promises, and whatever power they have left to affect policy.

    • KimjongTOOILL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They are fucking incapable of learning this.

      Bernie polled great against Trump but they snubbed him for Hillary and we lost because of it.

      The only reason Biden won was because he wasn’t Trump and we were tired of him at that point.

      Kamala had a chance to swing a little more left but continued to try to court moderate conservatives and the suburbs instead.

      They just can’t get it through their heads that: Trump and maga are winning as a reaction of “fuck the system”. This mostly stems from corporations and the filthy rich not being taxed enough and us not spending enough on social programs. That energy could have been captured and utilized by running a leftist.

      But instead we get milquetoast business as usual bullshit

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think it’s that this L forces the Democratic Party to lean back left with their campaign promises, and whatever power they have left to affect policy.

      Yeah, that’s what everyone thought after 2016 as well.

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Ah yes the free Palestine crowd…lol wait until they see what Israel will do with no US restraint demands.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not sure if this is legit but a coworker said 20 million Democrats didn’t vote. That’s depressing knowing if they had voted Dem, Kamala most likely would’ve won.

    • Phil_in_here
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s close to that. Another metric is 15 million fewer people voted Kamala than Biden last election. Trumps numbers stayed the same.

      15 million people just fucking gave up.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Trump’s numbers didn’t stay the same. Despite winning the popular vote, Donald trump had 2 million less voters than in 2020. That’s a hefty chunk.

        It just doesn’t matter, because 15 million other voters also didn’t show up.

  • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “If liberals are so fucking smart why do they lose so goddamn always?”

    • Will McAvoy “The Newsroom”

    I don’t think it’s fair to blame voters when it’s the politician’s job during s campaign to convince people they’re worth voting for.

    Adopting unpopular centrist policies and aligning more and more with centrist Biden’s policies as the campaign went on is just going to fill voters with apathy.

    The Democrats, once again, didn’t give us a candidate to vote for, only one to vote against. And I think the American people are sick of that carrot-stick routine, the Dems need to actually adopt popular policies.

    And the establishment Dems are going to fight that tooth and nail.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Yes, a Very Special Thanks to the morally pure angels who refused to vote for Kamala Harris because they were standing on high ground about some issue they disliked her on. Well done, fuckheads.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It really was (or at least the Democratic party’s fault). If you take every single third party voter, assign them to Kamala, she still loses.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The real problem here is that people needed to be convinced that voting was worth it when Trump was a candidate. How the fuck do you even reach someone with such a pathetic lack of concern for the world? Seriously you people think if she vowed to stop Israel, magically these dip shit knuckle dragging morons would’ve jumped at the chance to vote for her. Millions of people told us they give zero fucks. And fuck them for that.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Didn’t you hear? All Palestinians got a personal check for $1 million straight from trump himself.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Lying is cheap, especially when the media just repeats your rallies without issue.

          The moment trump got free press in 2016 was the worst point. They could have ignored him and we would have been doing Clinton vs Cruz.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Truth is literally free…

            He got press because Clinton wanted it that way and he was the candidate, you can’t just not cover them.

            • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              17 minutes ago

              He wasn’t always the nomation. It should have been:

              “Wow Trump is trying to run. Weird. Anyways, moving on.”

              You look at all the people giving “commentary” as they play his full speeches of racism and go “lol no one will listen to that”. When clearly a lot of networks covering an (at the time) niche candidate gave him more attention.

              Also, lying is cheap. Investigating the truth costs time and labor. I can just say “The president is actually always mind controlled by Jews who are actually aliens” and it will take reasonable people longer to explain why that’s stupid, or look into why someone says it.

    • 4oreman@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      to be fair, the other candidate only had a few months. Biden is largely to blame.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Utterly bizarre. I expected Trump might squeak out an electoral win, but the popular vote as well? Thanks everyone who stayed the fuck home. You sat by as fascism was ushered in to the US.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Same. I’m not sure if I’m more… “Ok” with this? We should still abolish the electoral college, but we were shafted by the American people this time (and the propaganda machine making things worse). It’s the first time since I turned 18 that the GOP actually won the popular vote… Sigh

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Abolishing the electoral college would require a constitutional amendment, and isn’t even necessary. Passing the National Popular Vote law in a few more states will guarantee that the electoral college always follows the national popular vote. This law has already been passed by 17 states + DC, with a total of 209 electoral votes - already 3/4 of the way there, only 61 more votes needed. Go to the site to see if it already passed in your state.

          • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Now project 25 will swing into action. Then queue all those impacted who voted for the arsewipe to gasp “but he’s hurting the wrong people!”

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I heard about that, I just don’t know who else can join the coalition. It might be easier to do it as an amendment if there a massive shift in power over the next decade (and I shudder to think what that’d be that was so upsetting or so lethal that the entire landscape changes to Dems having a super majority).

          • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The NPV only needs states with 61 more electoral votes. In 7 states totaling 74 votes it has already passed half their legislatures (state house or senate but not both). So it’s actually a lot closer than starting from scratch with a constitutional amendment, which would need approval from 3/4 of all states.

              • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                22 minutes ago

                I don’t remember offhand but if you are interested the site I linked lists the 17 states where it has passed, and the 7 states where it has passed half of their legislature.

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      All votes are not counted yet. There’s still a chance he won’t get the popular vote. A tiny chance, but still a chance…

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There’s a bigger likelyhood Harris wins the electoral college than the popular vote, but both are pretty unlikely.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      117
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Special shout-out to the folks that voted third party because “my state will be blue”

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        folks that voted third party because “my state will be blue”

        Admittedly not all the votes are in, but…

        • Pennsylvania - Trump up by 130k votes, Jill Stein got 33k votes
        • Michigan - Trump up by 84k votes, Jill Stein got 45k votes
        • Wisconsin - Trump up by 28k votes, Jill Stein got 12k votes

        Are all Jill Stein votes from protest voters? Nah, there are diehard Green supporters out there.

        Are there other 3rd party candidates? Of course, but how many RFK (more votes than Stein in WI) voters could she have converted? Almost none.

        This was her blue wall road to victory, show me the electoral path to victory ruined by third party voters who would have otherwise voted Democrat.

        This election was lost by people not showing up to vote. Trump is sitting at almost 72M votes right now compared to 74M in 2020. Harris is only at 67M now, compared to Biden’s 81M in 2020. While there are still votes to count, there aren’t 15M votes left to count.

        Whether it was lack of interest, protest, or whatever reason, 10% of voters stayed home this year.

        • FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My election registration got canceled three times this year. The last two times it was because of a “duplicate”, and they were counting my canceled registrations as duplicates. I have no idea if my ballot got counted, or if it was discarded.

          I vote blue in one of those red states…

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          “Admittedly not all the votes are in, but…” you’ll pretend to make a point with vote counts anyway.

          I am so fucking sick of all this shit.

          • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago
            • Pennsylvania - 98.3% Reporting
            • Michigan - 98.7% Reporting
            • Wisconsin - 99% Reporting

            These states have been called for Trump. The remaining outstanding vote will not impact this result. The remaining vote is not going to come in all for Jill Stein or other third party candidates. The point that protest votes for third party candidates did not rob Harris of an electoral college victory will stand once 100% of the vote is in.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        No state had enough third party votes to flip red to blue had they all gone blue, so can we give this a rest?

        The DNC failed, plain and simple.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Got me there, though if you look and tally only the left candidates who might’ve actually gone for Harris otherwise it’s still not true.

            And in any case, she still loses even if she got these states.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            “The real problem” sounds pretty plain and simple that.

            Seriously though what are you saying? What’s the point of that statement?

            They failed, that’s plain and simple. The cause behind that? Probably more complicated.

            • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah, and since it sounds pretty much that way, it definitely is that way and you win the internet argument, right?

              I think the main problem in discussing most issues is that people oversimply them. Memes and meme-level thinking don’t get to the essence of an issue, they just pretend to by expressing a single point of view, reinforcing the false belief that the whole issue is plain and simple, and excusing people for not bothering to exert their brains much before the scroll to the next item in their feed.

      • TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I thought my state would go blue. Went out to vote anyway and voted blue. Brought my spouse out to vote as well. Our state did not go blue. Country is fucked

    • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Taking the data from here and throwing it in a spreadsheet, Trump got more votes than everyone else combined, including the Libertarian party, RFK Jr, and Write-ins.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Looking at that chart, she would have won in Wisconsin and gotten their ten electoral votes.

        What does it look like for the rest of the states?

        • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Across the country, it was Trump: 71,825,780 Everyone else: 69,303,000

          It says at the top of the page it was last updated a day ago, but I kind of doubt the numbers will change too dramatically.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The other person was making the point that you can’t do it by total popular vote, you have to do it by state and then look at their electoral college votes.

            • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              But the electoral college is dumb and pointless. This is the first time a Republican won the popular vote since 2004, or since 1988 if you don’t want to count an incumbent victory. That alone should tell you plenty about the state of the country right now.

              • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It’s dumb and pointless, but it’s literally the way a president is elected today. We have had many instances of people being elected president who didn’t win the popular vote. So if you want to try to figure out if third party candidates caused Trump to get elected, you have to look at it state by state.

              • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 hours ago

                But the electoral college is dumb and pointless

                And its also how a president is elected in the United States, or 2016 would have gone a bit differently.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            67m for Harris to 72m (rounded up) on the BBC; it was really not close eh.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        But how do you count “didn’t vote”? And what about “voted on other parts but not for President because genocide or whatever”? That second group might be countable, but the first is like proving a negative

    • Darorad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Honestly, it doesn’t matter, even if every single 3rd party voter went for Harris, Trump still wins