

Soylent original.
it’s so plain. I love it. I could switch to it almost entirely. I could get fat on it.
Soylent original.
it’s so plain. I love it. I could switch to it almost entirely. I could get fat on it.
that’s what this post is, but it’s not what caused the ban
having multiple fediverse accounts is not bannable, and ad hominem is itself bad faith. calling it out is not.
Removed by mod
they said fight, not hope
when does the candidate become responsible for their own turnout
if the first one is true then the second explanation is moot
I used nicotine pouches for a year then cold turkeyed at day 365
votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome
i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters
but we don’t know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it’s an interesting theory and we can test it!!
it’s intentionally vague. build an affinity group and assess your capabilities.
your assertion isn’t that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.
ok well if you don’t have any evidence I’m going to dismiss your conclusion.
I didn’t say they are. but these options are not effective.
not according to the fao
all of agriculture is only about 20%. animal agriculture is a subset of that. don’t lie
and yet they did not actually suggest any direct actions
I don’t care for your dehumanization
please run the experiment with a sufficient sample size and let me know the results.
no one wanted my memes before the election