Immigration targets have risen steadily in recent years. Last year, the government released a plan to grant permanent residency to 465,000 people in 2023, a figure that would rise to 500,000 by 2025.

The immigration target for 2015 was under 300,000.

  • floofloof
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How many houses and apartments are built in Canada each year? How does this immigration rate balance with the population decline that would otherwise be happening?

    • saigot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The natural increase rate in Canada is 0.1%, or around 40K people per year (source). As for housing 260K houses started construction in 2022 (source). With an average household size of 2.5 that means that new housing is roughly keeping up with new demand. Of course just because a home is built does not mean it is affordable, and just keeping up doesn’t fix the already existing lack of housing. There are goals to increase housing production to 400K a year but there isn’t really the construction workers to pull that off.

      • Pyr_Pressure
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That also doesn’t take into account the number of homes which deteriorate to being no longer livable each year or the ones demolished to create more housing.

        We may be adding 260K houses but it’s possible that 20k were demolished to make room for those.

        • saigot
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that’s definitely a thing not being accounted for. Best I got is this. It only tracks demos from places with over 50K people and it also includes comercial->residential and residential->commercial re-purposing. If my quick math is right The grand total of all the data they have is only 2K so I don’t think it makes a huge difference.

    • corsicanguppy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Consider as well the changing demographic and how we will maintain a system of consolidated services to best care for our elders.

    • Avid AmoebaOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can get that by looking at the total population over time.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That seems like a crazy amount of people to add to the employment and housing situations.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uh oh.

    Are politicians going to have to start funding post secondary schools instead of extracting money from the developing world?

    Will Tim’s franchise owners need to pay a reasonable wage?

    What about fish plants and meat packers? Will they need to consider automation?

    And what about the landlords renting to foreign students at inflated rates?

  • spyd4r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact dollarama has 2000 people show up to interview for 2 openings tells me this isn’t sustainable.

    • Avid AmoebaOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this true? The unemployment numbers are pretty low even after the interest hikes.

      • spyd4r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen it 2 or 3 times myself in my own town. I can only imagine it’s everywhere.

  • zephyreks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    My complaint isn’t about immigration, but that we’re not using our immigration policy to attract top talent.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After making a number of increases to its immigration targets in recent years, the federal government announced Wednesday that it’s aiming to maintain its target of welcoming 500,000 new permanent residents in 2026.

    Immigration targets have risen steadily in recent years.

    Last year, the government released a plan to grant permanent residency to 465,000 people in 2023, a figure that would rise to 500,000 by 2025.

    The immigration target for 2015 was under 300,000.

    Canada’s population grew by a record 1 million people in 2022.

    The country also surpassed the 40 million people mark earlier this year.


    The original article contains 94 words, the summary contains 94 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Daniel Quinn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Immigrants don’t all become citizens. Many stay for a few years and move on, many more will acquire indefinite leave to remain and never go the extra mile for citizenship. Of those that become citizens (after years of living in Canada) and gain the right to vote, many tend to vote Conservative as they’re coming from more culturally conservative countries.