• driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    I asked that to chatgpt once and it’s answer was something like “You like to translate R code to Python” just because I sometimes ask it’s to translate R to Python, but I don’t personally like it

    • Lit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You don’t like doing it so you ask something else to do it for you.

  • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s completely irrelevant to the article, but I can’t believe nobody mentioned how many fucking headphones this person goes through lol

    particulars of every purchase I’ve ever made – from the noir novel I bought on the day that Amazon UK launched to the 28th pair of headphones acquired in as many years

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      “In as many years” is doing a lot of work there. I dont think Amazon was selling headphones in 1997.

      That said if they are spending 10-40 bucks on headphones a year they are doing alright.

      • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Are they?? Am I the weird one for not constantly breaking headphones? I’m in my 30s and I can count on two hands the number of headphones I’ve had in my entire life and several of them I got for free with iPhones

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I paid I think 250 for earphones over covid. They went in the wash a few weeks ago. I’ll probably spend between 300 and 400 on a replacement. That will ~700 spent which I would hope would do me for at least an additional five years so 70 a year is more than what I would imagine they are spending annually.

          That said I expect mine to be better

          • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s fair I suppose. I buy quality to last as well. I’ve only bought two pairs of headphones in the last 10 years. One pair is wired in ear studio monitors that came with a pouch to prevent damage and the other was some wired over the ear open backs for when I need to be quiet at my desk.

            • Squizzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              We are lucky to be able to to make decisions that take us out of false economy situations. Inwould have bought multiples when I was younger, I might only have 10-30 to spend when I’d need/want them.

              This is agood example of how it can be more expensive to be poor, the old example being boots that are half thebpricr lasting a quarter of time of the alternative.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I absolutely tear through headphones. When they’re wired, the wire breaks where it meets the earpiece. When they’re wireless, the battery last like two hours. The USB port on my phone is long dead, and they don’t sell phones with the old headphone jack that didn’t break.

      But I still refuse to be that guy playing music on the bus.

      • ZiemekZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Buy some on-ears or (better yet) over-ears, still rocking my Sony WH-CH700N for almost 6 years. Can’t find a successor for them, CH710N and CH720N for unknown reasons got rid of aptX ;_;

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You need to buy a pair of good ones. Not hyped, not endorsed by whatever weird rap singer, but good ones.
        I bought a pair of good BT headphones 10 years ago, and they still going great. 10 years ago the battery lasted 20 hours, now it’s around 12 or so, which is still more than enough.

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I don’t know the exact model unfortunately, It’s Sennheiser and they’re all weird. The old one can’t connect to their new configuration software so I can’t check.
            I also have their newer version, Momentum 3, and can very much recommend that one, all the same great quality, but also Bluetooth 5.0

    • nul42
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Clearly written by a Ferengi.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    In 2023, 60% of UK households had a smart speaker, up from 22% before the pandemic.

    Jesus Christ. I had no idea so many people were buying these things. That’s astounding.

    If you’d asked me to guess what percentage of households had one, I’d have guessed single digits.

    • eleitl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      60% of people in UK are certified morons. Slightly higher than I expected.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          remember when Texas power turned off peoples heaters when they were freezing to death as Rafael Edward Cruz went on a tropical vacation?

          yeah, they did that because those people registered their smart thermostats with the company and gave them control to set the temperatures in their own damn homes.

          “smart” means, “you don’t own it”.

          • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            In the UK, the take up of smart meters for electric and gas has been slow due go concerns that this would enable companies to do the same.

            It’s not a bad argument (haven’t paid, turn it off) but then if you’re struggling financially is it better not to be allowed to rack up further debt anyway?

          • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            That depends on the kind of “smart”.

            I have a bunch of IKEA “smart” light bulbs, but they are connected through a Sonoff USB Zigbee dongle. And all of it is controlled through the open-source zigbee2mqtt and home-assistant.

            No one, but myself and my family, have any control or ownership of any of those devices.

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              *until the ZigBee alliance is purchased by a large corporation.

              wait that happened when it merged into the Connectivity Standards Alliance in 2011.

              my point is that merging home utilities with any technology is like drinking bleach. a small amount won’t kill you, but a large enough dose over time will.

              being in the tech sector myself along with watching what the tech oligarchs are doing should warrant at least some caution.

              IMO anything that is associated with corporate interests cannot be fully trusted. I understand that IOT cannot exist without corporate buy-in, but at the same time I think it should be acknowledged that anything that cannot exist without corporate interference is damaging to consumers.

              • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Even if ZigBee became the most evil corporation in existence.

                They still wouldn’t be able to update their devices when they aren’t connected to the internet.

              • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                It doesn’t really matter whether Zigbee was merged into something else, because it simply doesn’t have any technical means of phoning home. It simply can’t access the Internet.

                There’s no intermediate corporate owned servers, there’s no proprietary software.

                So it doesn’t really matter what the corporation does because it can’t affect my “smart” devices.

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  other than drop all support when “big ma bell” enters the chat with a corporate competitor and you have aging infrastructure built into your home.

                  it’ll be like those crappy intercom wall units from the 1970s all over again, except you won’t be able to turn on your lights or plugs.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have three unopened google pucks that I received as gifts over the years.

      I had four, but I opened one to take apart to help identify if it was possible to hack it.

      at the time it was not. the only part that can be reused it the plastic shell.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      What is the absofuckingworstly scariest thing about this is that I’ve personally read quite a few sci-fi books, like in half of them, like in any universe, such things were usually a Trojan horse by the threat of the week to exterminate the good guys, or at least Palpatine’s way of spying, or whatever.

      OK, Palpatine’s coolest microphone was decorative trees with skin changing colors depending on vibrations, and a very complex system of restoring the sounds from image, if I remember that correctly, in one X-Wing book.

      So how the hell does it happen that such things are presented in movies and books and series like a threat, and yet people buy them?

      I can believe in people loving touchscreens because touchscreens were unfortunately popularized in Star Trek and even, sigh, Star Wars prequels, and everything sci-fi.

      But this is something that was being recommended against in such media for decades.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like I looked into a bag labeled ‘everything Alexa has ever heard’ and gone, “I don’t know what I expected.”

    On the other side of the coin, the shock shouldn’t be what it knows, but what every single other device you own with a micrphone might also know.

    Anyone here that isn’t as equally distrusting of a stock, off the shelf cellphone is lying to themselves.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The most concerning part about this article is that they put one in their nine-year-old’s bedroom.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      3 days ago

      Based on the article, it lets her ask them things that she doesn’t want to ask her parents, though I’m not sure that if I were 9 years old that I’d suddenly want to discover that my parents have a list of everything I’ve asked it and are reading through it, much less that Amazon has a database.

      • brot@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, that is a terrible violation of trust. A parent should stop listening when they find out that they have a copy of such conversations of their child. They shouldn’t write a newspaper article with citations about it

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          A parent shouldn’t be letting their single digit aged child have unsupervised access to the Internet. Agreed that they shouldn’t be publicizing it, but this idea that parents should be letting their kids have secrets when they’re so little is one way dangerous adults take advantage of kids.

    • lordbritishbusiness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      To add to the other responses, and I suspect the real reason, is that Coco is listening to Audible Audio books regularly and/or music. It’s mentioned and then dropped by the article fairly quickly.

      Interesting how every comment on the article is doing the “you’re a terrible parent, how could you do that” routine when I’ll bet it’s there because Coco either took the first one in or asked for a second one. Kid wants, kid normally gets one way or another.

      • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also, surely this device is no different to a phone in that neither is meant to be listening indiscriminately. There’s a chance a 9 year old has a phone nowadays I’d imagine

    • skull887@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Why?

      Edit: No one answers the question yet downvotes me for asking a simple question that wasn’t clearly answered in the article. That article really didn’t say anything outside of Amazon documents every prompt ever.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because they have no idea why not to. Despite having written the article explaining that clearly.

        • skull887@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Must have missed the part where the article explained anything clearly other than Amazon documents all your prompts.

            • skull887@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              That it’s listening and remembering when I talk to it? That’s not exactly spying on us.

              • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                You’re getting douchevoted for speaking heresy but you’re right, Amazon only records requests and commands - i.e. what you say after “Alexa”. Every article about what Amazon actually does and doesn’t record is quickly forgotten because sinister plots are far more entertaining.

                • skull887@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Thank you and god forbid someone has a different opinion. There are a lot of assumptions on the internet about what smart speakers are and aren’t but this article didn’t reveal anything shocking IMO. The writer didn’t even seem bothered by all of it. It just came off as a simple observation piece to me.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                A couple of days later, I received an email containing links to gigabytes of information: particulars of every purchase I’ve ever made – from the noir novel I bought on the day that Amazon UK launched to the 28th pair of headphones acquired in as many years. Records of every page turn of every Kindle ebook I’ve opened, every moment of Prime content I’ve watched, measured by the second. And, of course, the details of every interaction we have ever had with our Echo; every question asked, every song requested, every timer set.

                They don’t make it easy to find gold among the fields of data available for download.

                That’s exactly what it is.

                • skull887@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It gave him back every piece of data he had put into Amazon which was tied to a log in. Where is the spying? He willing did this and the whole piece felt like an observation more than a worry. Just my perception that though.

        • skull887@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Was there any indication that it was listening outside of being prompted? That’s just an assumption and would be no different than the phone we all have in our pockets most of the day.

    • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Its kinda depressing that the takeaway they seem have here is “we don’t always have enough time for our family, but luckily Alexa can pick up the slack 😌”

      Instead of “society pushes us to spend less time making meaningful connections and more time relying on services that cost you money or privacy”

      Somebody’s toddler is going to eat rocks after AI tells them it’s safe, especially if you’re giving your kids unfettered access to the internet, which is what Alexa is. You’re just hoping Jeffy moderates good, when you and I both know rules and restrictions for an LLM are very hard to enforce.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I was thinking about their horrifying conclusion as well, and your comment made me pine for the days when you wouldn’t know something. Think about it, back before the internet, if you had a random question, you either had to interact with some trusted person, or you went to the library and looked it up. It’s like the ever-present access to all information has quelled or killed any notion of curiosity or boredom, and it’s within those frames of mind that learning and inspiration come. I remember as a kid when I wouldn’t know the answer to something, I’d think on it for days, weeks. I’d get stuck on a video game level, and hit my head against the wall for hours trying to overcome it, only to pick up a random gamer magazine off the rack at the mall, and read the solution. Treating that magazine like it was the lost treasure map of some ancient expedition, passing it around my group of friends… Interactions and experiences that are gone forever.

        The idea that we’ve gradually went from relying on trusted professionals, learned educators, and scientific rigor, replacing them with a corporations data-harvesting LLM, on-line influencers, and click-bait “journals” cosplaying as academic centers with integrity. This article is basically celebrating the fact that we’ve off-shored all of our thinking, curiosity, and inquisitiveness to machines, all the while we struggle for scraps in a corporation dominated life devoid of genuine human interaction. We’re all to busy sipping dopamine hits from a screen instead of actually living our lives.

        I grew up while the internet was being slowly rolled out, and being from the last generation to remember what it was like before the internet, I can say that the things I miss most are privacy, the ability to be bored, and not knowing.

        It’s worse now, and it’s harder everyday to imagine that life on this planet will improve.

  • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I asked my google home the same question and it told me that I told it that my dog is a good girl 3 times. I know it’s not great for privacy, but it made me chuckle.