- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Woah woah woah, slow it down, we don’t know if it was murder yet. For all we know it was self defence.
I’m not sure what your point is. That’s why there’s a trial. A murder trial. To decide if he’s guilty. Nothing in the story claims otherwise. In fact, they go out of their way to point out that he has only been accused, not convicted.
Or someone different.
Exactly. The media—and people as a whole—need to stop automatically assuming he’s the killer. Even those who support him are still acting like he’s the one who did it. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
People generally don’t have time to whittle words about their attackers profession onto bullet casings in a shootout, and fabricating untraceable firearms generally isn’t something rich people do for self defence.
Yes, but who has the time to do that when they’re playing Battletech at the same time as the murder? Which he totally was with me at that exact moment.
Yes but no matter how obvious you think guilt is, eveyone has to go through a trial. Cops aren’t the judges or executioners.
That’s merely your understanding of self defence.
Other people like those in the jury may have a different understanding - and their understanding is more important here.Lmao
Have fun in fairyland
I didn’t predict how it’d end, just what counts.
Have fun in defeatistland.Don’t let these fools crush your dreams of world where regular jackoffs like you and me watch out for each other. I got your back on this one fam
I won’t, but it’s always good knowing we’re not alone and on the right side.
Thank you! I’ve got yours!
Innocent until proven guilty!
Jury nullification would send a very powerful message .
Also the law doesn’t matter anymore anyway, so nobody should vote to convict because they’re concerned about the rule of law.
Whats the message?
Delay, deny? Depose.
Delay, Dissent, Depose?
Maybe that sometimes roping in illegitimate behaviour requires illegal measures, if legal measures aren’t working?
What message did you receive?That the wellbeing of the majority should be more important than the wealth of a few. And that the situation is currently so skewed that it’s not surprising people are rising up against it.
In response to hearing about your 10,000+ individual donations, averaging under $30
So if that doesn’t send a message, maybe another CEO to spell it out?
Every Luigi needs a Mario.
look, im not a fan of Luigi. im a fan of justice. and i aint seen shit in that video where the CEO falls over
Jury being shown the footage
I never noticed how robotic those head turns are.
I think that gif has been sped up too
Hers is meant to be from pure shock, but yeah his is pretty obvious in context.
Where is this scene from?
Westworld
He didn’t do anything wrong! The CEO just became permanently neutral to all future endeavors.
Hopefully he’s got a cousin named Vinny.
What’s a yoot?
I’m surprised they kept this guy alive. Maybe they figured out how obvious epstein looked and didn’t risk it with this guy
Luigi hasn’t harmed any currently alive rich people, when he killed one another took their place.
Epstein was a threat to Trump and a UK Prince, among others.
Epstein had blackmail, and as such was still a danger to the rich, even in jail. On the other hand, Luigi was just some guy with a gun who got lucky, if they can lock him up for the rest of his life, he doesn’t pose any danger.
*Allegedly
Didn’t see any bullets in that video. The CEO probably just tripped over something on the ground and fell over.
tripped over something
Greed.
He’s already on a path to martyrdom.
They kill him, 100 more will take his place.
I fear that we’re witnessing a concerted conditioning aimed at ensuring the suspension of habeus corpus. At this point, it seems to be a bipartisan theatrical effort. I reallllllly hope I’m just being paranoid because if I’m right, we have no concept of the hell that awaits us (I’m writing this from a quantum decryption proof VPN)
That’s not gonna go far
300k+ to work one of the most famous cases in the nation? You bet your ass lawyers are looking at that. No matter the outcome you’re a legend. You can’t buy that kind of PR/marketing.
Anyone know if Johnny Cochrane is still working?
Was gonna say this. Its not the money its the fame and if they pull it off they will literally be legends.
Enough money that it’s a legitimate job on its own really helps. 300k is a reasonable number for that.
Keep in mind that is not the take home pay of an attorney but will need to be used for various expenses which pile up with court cases including hiring people to do various aspects of the work on something this big. Its very possible that Karen Friedman Agnifilo may end up doing it pro bono which if the possible pay is low enough may even be preferable to do financially for her.
Even if they don’t, they’re legends!
I would disagree. If they fail they will have the basic fame and a noteworthy trivia around the thing but legendary? Thats gonna require a win.
It’s a shame he even needs the money since it’s so obvious he’s innocent.
Obviously! He was hanging out with me we were exploring this spooky house.
Innocence is insufficient in our society
He was chilling with me, hanging by the sea, in a country with no extradition treaty.
I’m sparticus!
I don’t think 300 million would even be enough. They want to make an example of him.
They’re not self aware enough to realize they’re going to make a martyr out of him
How do you figure? The US has handled a lot of notorious cases, and most of them get quietly forgotten in prison.
How many of them were a rich white dude? That’s the difference.
Ahem…I would like to add that he’s hot too…
deleted by creator
It could have gone far towards doing some actual good, instead of donated to an ivy league kid’s murder defence fund.
Good luck with that. Unless they legalize murder he’s pretty much fucked.
Likely yes, but everyone has a right to a trial by a jury of their peers and, who knows?
Political discourse is really poor in this country and they need all 12 to convict.
I don’t really understand lemmy’s derision for this opinion.
It’s the obvious outcome. Luigi might be a hero but he’s going to jail.
Innocent until proven guilty.
“well akshually” comments are poorly received everywhere.
I think the random spike in interaction specifically to downvote opinions, counter to wannabe revolutionary fuel, are suspicious af.
TBH these luigi posts might just be a bunch of Tankies trying to convince us to start violence in the streets.
When folks are dying so oligarchs can make billions, there’s already violence.
But folks lionizing Luigi is what bothers you?
Tbh, I had to look at your post history to be sure you weren’t a propaganda bot.
Look up Gary Plauché. Dude put a bullet at close range into the temple of a guy being escorted by police, got a suspended sentence. But we can dream
Plauché didn’t kill a rich person.
This guy is going to spend decades in prison unless he starts running for president.
People are advertising jury nullification, but that won’t clear him for the same reason that a McDonald’s employee would tell the cops where to find him.
They first need to prove he’s the murderer
My fear is he’s going to be used to instigate the social unrest needed for project 2025 to reach it’s goal of suspension of habeus corpus by June 30th. That’s end game and the way they’re concentrating messaging against the judicial branch right now means they’re grinding toward the 6 month milestone right on schedule.
The fact the most famous dems aren’t saying the above is chilling.
What if we all got too comfy with our rights and values during lockdown and the tree is about to be shaken so violently that we’ll all be thankful for a low wage job in a few years? I guarantee that’s a bipartisan goal.
Stay peaceful folks, the future demands it.
There could be a legitimate conspiracy, for sure, but the Dems aren’t manufacturing this hell. The Dems wanted to tax the rich and socialize healthcare, we’ve just never believed them enough to give them the power.
I don’t remember Biden or Harris running on socialized health care so what are you talking about?