It’s not. It’s weird that you’re defending a billionaire, bootlicker.

Notorious rape advocates are more than “people I don’t like”.

If it’s your city’s/country’s team, has historically been your family’s team, there’s a player you particularly like or there’s something special that makes the team stand out (eg I support Chivas/Guadalajara becuase they only hire Mexicans). It has little to do with sports, tbh. I know very few people who support a sports team on its sporting merits alone and they’re all insufferable.

It doesn’t vibe with animal farm, though

I mean, making an assumption and arriving to a contradiction is as correct as a proof gets.

We don’t need Batman, at this point, we need Manchester Black.

I also believe he should face an appropriate sentence. What’s the sentence for hunting without a licence in NY?

Well, if you don’t wanna celebrate a monster dying just for the sake of it, we can look at it from an environnent perspective, taking that pos out did more for the environnent than Green Peace has in the last 10 years.

Oh, God. I started Kingdom Come Deliverance a couple of years ago and spoke to a girl in the starting farm which, apparently, is how you trigger the DLC. I finished the whole thing thinking it was just a long mission and ended up with her becoming a badass only to be thrown back to the main game in the body of the useless kid and haven’t touched it ever since.

Math graduate here. I support renaming tetrahedrons to D4.

I don’t think you’re picking up what I’m putting down. I’m not arguing that the return value can be 1, I’m well aware that it can’t — I wrote the function so that it will always return 0. It only returns 1 if we make an incorrect assumption (and mix up semantics with formal logic, but that’s another conversation), the incorrect assumption being “if is equivalent to if, and only if”

I agree but it’s also what the original meme is doing. I thought we were all shitposting here.

Yes, I know, that’s the point. Funky is specifically constructed to always return 0. Then we assume “if” and “if, and only if” are equivalent and by following that assumption to its logical conclusion, we deduce that funky returns 1. Therefore, our assumption was incorrect because 0≠1. It follows that “if” isn’t equivalent to “if, and only if”. Also, it’s just a shitpost.

lol no, it isn’t. It’s a reference to Don’t you blame anyone by Julio Cortazar.

No, they’re not.

Let’s assume they are. Let funky function be defined as:

int funky() {
    a=0
    b=1
    if ( a==1 ) {
        b=1
    }
    return(a)
}

Since a==1 if, and only if, b=1, in particular a==1 if b=1. We have b=1, therefore a==1. It follows funky will always return 1 but… it doesn’t. QED.

Have fun

Could be worse. You could have died while trying to put on a sweater.

Men kill more women than bears even adjusted per encounter.

Yep. Honestly, Lemmy feels like a circlejerk sometimes.

How dare you speak out against Steam?! Can’t you see they’re the good guys?!