• regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Poor use of this meme template. The last sentence is not even a question!

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I find it funny when people get upset that a meme template gets used in a novel way. These aren’t religious texts that are immutable, memes evolve over time.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    TikTok has literally nothing to do with informing tho… it’s literally the opposite.

  • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’d like tiktok to fully disappear but not for the reasons governments want it to. I just miss YouTube haikus and memes without music always playing.

  • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is actually a good point. Last time I said something good about China I was attacked on lemmy for it being censored. As if that doesn’t happen here

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      There is no contradiction here, because the communists, with their customary candor, acknowledge the necessity of stifling speech they deem to be harmful. It is the liberals, those self-appointed guardians of unfettered discourse, who are engaging in hypocrisy. They wax lyrical about the sanctity of free expression, only to abandon their lofty principles the moment their narrative falters.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        because the communists,

        Show us on the doll where the communists touched you…

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Where and who are these communists you’re referring to?

            I asked like this, because it’s generally a hallucination, as communists have no real power over others, anywhere on this planet. So, it’s a logical impossibility that you could have experienced any kind of censorship done by communists.

              • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Communists haven’t held power in China in a very long time… If they did, they wouldn’t be a state capitalist society.

                And how have the Vietnamese and Cuban governments censored your speech lately? And what reach would you say they have on social media?

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  How to say you don’t have any clue about China without saying you don’t have any clue about China. If you genuinely want to learn about China I can recommend this book, but we both know that you don’t https://redletterspp.com/products/the-east-is-still-red

                  And how have the Vietnamese and Cuban governments censored your speech lately? And what reach would you say they have on social media?

                  I’m sure you can figure out how google works all on your own. The reality is that no society practices free speech absolutism, and the only question is what type of speech gets censored. I urge you to spend a bit of time educating yourself on the subject you’re attempting to debate here instead of wasting everyone’s time.

  • firadin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bad take. We’re in the modern world of information warfare: expecting every citizen to be immune to psychological trickery from a nation spending tens of billions to research and test ways to trick them is unrealistic and unreasonable. There’s people with PhDs in human psychology spending their entire time and untold amounts of compute power trying to stoke the flames of division and push misinformation and you think we should allow it?

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        The US government isn’t in charge of one of the largest social media platforms in the world. US corporations are absolutely doing this as well, but that’s an argument for more regulation not to grant China free reign

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          The US government isn’t in charge of one of the largest social media platforms in the world. US corporations are absolutely doing this as well, but that’s an argument for more regulation not to grant China free reign

          US-run social media apps are pretty much now just arms of the US surveillance state, functioning both as pro-US propaganda machines, and tools to spy on the communications of the entire world.

          For example, the most popular social media app in India for example, is facebook. The US controls the main method of news and communication for a country much larger than its own.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Yeah, and…? Does that mean we ignore the one under CCP control because… why? It’s not fair?

            Also, I’m not questioning the data as it’s clearly about when they began collecting data, but that chart looks a little… sketchy. Like you pulled it from your Great Aunt’s Facebook feed in 2014. Where is the data from? That does not appear to be any kind of valid source I’m aware of in the corner. When was this made, and how much has changed since then?

            • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              Like you pulled it from your Great Aunt’s Facebook feed in 2014. Where is the data from? That does not appear to be any kind of valid source I’m aware of in the corner.

              They’re slides of internal US prism program documents from the 2010 US global surveillance disclosures that Snowden and Assange exposed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM#The_slides

              When was this made, and how much has changed since then?

              There’s no reason to think the US government has stopped any of these programs. If anything, given the massive DoD budgets, they’ve increased.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              US Government doesn’t own AT&T, and yet, they have their fiber splice in AT&T’s building, in order to spy on all international communications.

            • peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              He didn’t say the government owned Facebook. Even so, it doesn’t need to own it to control the flow of information.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          The US intelligence & propaganda machines dwarf those of all other states, just as the US military dwarfs those of all other states. And they don’t only direct it at other countries, they direct it inward, too. “Russiagate” was a domestic psyop directed at its own people, to manufacture our consent to censorship. Hamilton 68: How former intelligence officials and Democratic operatives conspired to manufacture ‘Russiagate’

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The US most definitely uses its surveillance and propaganda system to influence the public. This was all exposed a long time ago.

            The thought that Russia influences AOTUS is a conspiracy is probably one of the more bonker things I have ever heard though.

            For sure stories were made up but anything short of of acknowledging that Russia has financially supported and heavily influenced everything about the current administration is pure conservatard garbage.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          US corporations are absolutely doing this as well, but that’s an argument for more regulation not to grant China free reign

          Exactly this. This is their only argument against it, and it’s trash. Yeah, no shit, we know they are all doing it. Yes, we all agree that they should be dealt with as well.

    • saigot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      expecting every citizen to be immune to psychological trickery from a nation spending tens of billions to research and test ways to trick them is unrealistic and unreasonable.

      Trying to scrub all properganda from our lives is also impossible. Better to get a balanced media diet from a variety of sources.

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s hard when people smarter than you are being paid billions to study and test exactly how to keep you addicted to their media platform. And if that doesn’t work, they’ll just buy your preferred media platform and devolve it themselves.

  • Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Are you saying next are going to be Facebook, Twitter and maybe Fox? Dont give me hope…

  • joenforcer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    The good news is that the main contingent of people upset about TikTok getting banned have willingly rotted away their attention spans (ironically, through TikTok) to do anything meaningful about it. The moment they realize being mad takes effort they’ll find something else to do.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Instagram, facebook, twitter, youtube, and reddit: all well-known for improving the mental health and attention-span of their users. /s

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Literally the only “argument” you people have.

        “Wah, the other ones do it too!” yeah, no shit, and they should also be regulated. I don’t think anyone here believes otherwise. Maybe, just maybe, it makes sense to prioritize the one that’s under the control of a foreign adversary.

        And even if you don’t prioritize it, this is the one that we currently have the opportunity to regulate, so why would we refuse that just because we’re not doing the same thing to the other ones RIGHT NOW? Once again allowing perfect to be the enemy of good.

        Do you see now how that’s not a real argument?

        It’s like if a student got caught cheating on a test, and complains that they shouldn’t get an F, because “everyone else was cheating too.” Were they cheating? Maybe. Is it relevant? Not at all.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Why on earth would the US government regulate its own propaganda and surveillance programs? Their goal is to control the narrative world-wide, and force-feed the world pro-US foreign policy positions.

          Also, the US are the ones telling you that tiktok is doing the same thing that their companies are. You should take anything a serial liar says with an extreme grain of salt, and distrust it by default. There’s no evidence that Chinese companies are doing what the US companies are.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I dunno… TikTok is the reason I now know about:

      • Rosewood Massacre
      • Black Wall St
      • Tulsa Massacre
      • 1985 MOVE Bombing
      • Indigenous Customs for my neighboring nations
      • Haluci Nation (An indigenous artist)

      Just to name some highlights. These really could never gain traction on FB, enough to catch my attention. And then, lo and behold, we have Black and Brown content creators putting out good knowledge for those who just didn’t know…