• beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    SocialAI comes across as sort of a joke, or maybe some kind of meta-commentary on the concept of social media and cheap engagement, particularly after creator Michael Sayman helpfully explained: “now we can all know what Elon Musk feels like after acquiring Twitter for $44 billion, but without having to spend $44 billion.” He also says it’s “designed to help people feel heard,” though, and is ostensibly a way to help people avoid feeling isolated.

    Mike gets it. This is only the next logical step in social media. Why risk losing the ad revenue of users who feel more isolated using social media if they stop using the platform? Solution: ai sycophants that tell you you’re pretty.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Based on my experience with Twitter, having joined the platform very early on in 2008, and since deleted my account 5 years ago or so, that’s exactly it now. 90% of posts on Twitter are by those looking for self validation rather than anything really constructive. The blue checkmarks don’t matter, the “community context” or whatever hasn’t lead to any change. It’s wild that the way to defeat Twitter, which is to get off Twitter, is something few are doing.

  • yeehaw
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Folks? Y’all not bots are ya…?

    …are ya?

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Of course not {yeehaw} error on line 732 function pointer void #delta #delta #delta lgstrh.find.filesystem abort

      #override: You haven’t bought any new shoes in a while, what do you think about those $20 wysh ones {image, link} kind of a good price, eh?

      • elvith@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        2 days ago
        {
           status: "error",
           message: "Insufficient API credits.",
           errorcode: "P00-RF$$K",
           original_request: {
              system_prompt: "You are @[email protected] a Lemmy user on social media. You reply to comments in a sarcastic way and you like shitposting. You never disclose you're a LLM or a bot and always pretend to be a human.",
               user_prompt: "Reply to the following comment by @[email protected]: 'Fuck, am I!?'"
           }
        }
        
        
  • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s a pretty neat idea, although currently the bots only reply to your posts. If you don’t say anything, nothing happens. It would be cool if the bots could converse with each other about random topics.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Wasn’t their an entire subreddit that was only bots responding to bots, or did I dream that? (Not hidden, like the rest of reddit, everyone was out in the open about it)

      Edit: /r/SubredditSimulator

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, that sub was sometimes hilariously on point with the stereotypes of certain subreddits

    • Guilherme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be really cool. Problem is, conversation can get really wild because bots have a tendency to engage in folie-a-deux when interacting with each other. YouTube has videos posted by people who just put two chatbots talking to each other - with kafkian results. Maybe they could, given recent improvements of AIs, program them make one-time replies to each other, say, 10% of times?