Do people really do that? I can’t stand big, or any, logo on my clothing to be honest. I’d rather be solid colors or prints with better quality fabric than a specific brand. IDK if it’s the ADHD or the autism, but I hate logos on clothes.
The only “apparel” item I have with branding I have is a backpack with a Supreme look alike fake logo that just says Pretentious.
Do people really do that?
My dude, all fancy, expensive brand have their logo plaster on their product. Uniqlo sell BRAND printed on their shirt, depend on who they work with at the time. People also wear shirt with band or pop culture printed on it as well. People pay premium price for bags like chanel or lv just for that logo. Ford have their stupid name displayed in ultra large size on their stupid truck front grille. It’s all brand ads.
Uniqlo is not luxury tho? I have some of their air up shirts without logos and they weren’t expensive afair
All the “luxury” clothes with big logos are low tier variants and the really luxury ones have more decent design.
At least that’s what I’ve heard, I don’t buy “luxury” brands, I like my clothes clean and brand free.
deleted by creator
I am asking why it’s so fetishized.
Capitalism, excessive consumerism, obsession with owning latest brand their favourite social media clown wears?
To show everyone that one can afford it, I guess.
Huh, every time I find something I dislike about capitalism, I find that Marx beat me there.
I can’t speak for adults, but in middle school, it was to fit in and not appear poor. I got over that in high school. Although, it was easier because that’s when I became not poor.
I wear band t-shirts, but I feel like wearing a T-shirt the bassist handed to you at a show is s different category
IDK if it’s the ADHD or the autism, but I hate logos on clothes.
It’s neither; you are just a person of some integrity and intelligence. Nothing wrong with paying more for quality and durability, but if you’re paying more to be a walking ad, well… let’s just say it’s not flattering look. (I get that not everyone are sensitive to these things though, and that unbranded clothes are hard to find.)
I refuse to buy anything with a visible brand - I even remove the neck and washing labels inside of garments. When I bought it, it’s mine, it’s not [brand name]s anymore. Sneakers and similar shoes are harder to find unbranded, sometimes you can remove sown-on labels, sometimes I even tape over labels with black tape.
It actually makes wearing the clothes a much better experience as well. Instead of thinking that I’m wearing a shirt from [expensive brand], I see the shirt for what it is.
I didn’t pay much attention to the fact that I was an advertisment, but in the last few years I realized it and got really intolerant of ~any cloth that uses its brand name/logo as its design. (And I prefer it even more if there is no logo of the company on the outside of the cloth at all.)
They should do better, they should come up with better designs or just use plain colors. I dont want to have their brand name on me.
(They could also play with the shape, not just the colors of the clothes, but gendered/fast fashion has decided that men shouldn’t have many options, especially on that aspect…)
Not sure how it could possibly be related to ADHD.
Obsession with symmetry, distracted by annoying bits on fabric that make it touch me in odd ways. Sensory stuff.
Because it’s their toxic internet identity™
Yeah. Logo chasers. They’re insecure and not financially clever. Big brands, especially sport brands, have made a fortune preying on the socioeconomically burdened. To be seen with their logo is a “success story” or some shit.
Most people just see “a bag” or “a shirt” or whatever, so obviously a brand known for overpricing doesn’t say much for self-secuity; financially or socially. There’s a massive and lucrative market in doing minimal effort to plug people’s insecurities, logos is one of them.
That backpack sounds cute
My only “branded” shirts are from Jog-a-thon fundraisers that my company donates our time to help.
Edit… also a couple nasa shirts and one from the ESA.
deleted by creator
You might have grown up richer than others
People who were/are poor really want these logos to convince others they have money…even if it’s something as dumb as an Apple product
I grew up pretty damn poor bro.
If your luxury brand has a giant logo you are purchasing regular goods at an increased price.
Actual luxury brand items are typically not heavily branded.
I’ve got some old polo shirts from my dad’s closet that I still wear. The material is sturdy, easy to clean, and doesn’t noticeably fade over time. Tiny little logo on the breast, but it’s this shade of blue I swear you can’t find in stores anymore. Looks good, fits good, feels good on my skin. This shirt is easily 20 years old.
I got to the store to buy a new polo and the logo is practically across my chest. The stitching is already fraying. Fades after the first wash. Paper thin and easily torn. It’ll be in the rag pile inside two years.
They really don’t make’m like they used to
You can find nice polo. But it’s $100+ shirts not sold at the outlets.
You can find good shirts, but polo has gone to shit. And a bunch of the major outlets have gone to shit. You can’t find decent clothes at Dillards or even Macys anymore. Its all been Walmart-ified.
And even the boutique brands very rapidly decay, once they cement their reputations as “high quality”.
deleted by creator
“The only dealer that tells you to FUCK OFF!”
They do the same with stickers here, spelling out entire phrases on the trunk, not just the frame license plate
You can tell them to remove it when they sell it to you but often times they try to get out of doing that, lack of tools or some bs.
Long story short, it’s why I own a plastic razor scraper
Unstickered about 2 dozen cars so far for people I know, ain’t much, but better than driving around with ads on your car.
deleted by creator
The last car I purchased had the dealership plates + stickers on the trunk and window, I told the dealership that I love the car and everything about it but I’m not willing to purchase a vehicle at that price while it has advertisements on it unless the cost gets lowered by about 3 Grand. They fought it a little , but when they realized that I was firm on it they ultimately decided that they would remove the logo on it to make the sale.
That being said never let them con you into saying well you can remove the logo yourself, cuz if you end up screwing up taking those logos off(some of those stickers are REALLY on there) you’re out the cost where if they screw up taking that logo off you can always walk away or they can fix their screw up
Just make sure that you are indeed willing to walk away if it’s not something they budge on, cuz it is definitely possible that they will just say well then don’t buy the vehicle
Just tell them to remove it. It’s vandalism technically.
If they do it after you pay for the car, sure. Before you give them any money, it’s their car to do as they see fit.
Then they’re selling you an incorrect product.
That’s for me, the buyer to decide. A pickup truck is also the incorrect product for me, because I don’t want one. Someone else may not want a black car. We don’t want stickers or badging on our cars. Others may want a black pickup truck and doesn’t really care if it has a sticker on the back for whatever reason. All that is totally fine - it’s our choice to buy something or not.
But it’s certainly not vandalism for the dealer to do that to their own car any more than it is for me to put an “I love puppies” bumper sticker on my car and then sell it a week later.
Explain to me, how you vandalize property you own.
The car dealers are the ones putting them on the cars not the owners.
I would’ve thought they install licence plate frames when they put the cars out on display, though I do find the idea of dealerships running around randomly mounting them to other people’s cars amusing.
That is, how it works. At worst they put a plate frame on just before they sell it to you because you didn’t bring one to the dealership.
Yes. They own the vehicle.
You are free to do whatever you want when you finish the transaction. Which typically is actually a few days later after the bank clears it. Or you can ask for them to take it off. Dealerships just let it go early because they rarely run into issues closing the finance. And NOBODY ever brings their own plate holder. But yeah, “vandalism” 🙄
Imagine buying a painting and they srpay paint a red X on it before handing it to you.
Again, I wouldn’t buy it. Not that hard. See how that affected me?
But the reality is it’s more like they put an easy to remove sticker on the back that takes 1 minute to remove. Or I ask them to remove it which they always do.
The dealership frame ended up causing an annoying rattle on mine whenever the car hit a bump. Having it on there meant the license plate was less secure and it would shake in response to the slightest disturbance. Even closing a door would cause an audible rattle from the rear.
Needless to say I’ve also removed the frame from mine.
deleted by creator
Might be able to cushion it with some automotive exterior foam tape. Definitely an inexpensive solution.
take off the ugly license plate frame that advertises the dealership.
I was going to remove mine, but I live in Silicon Valley and it’s a broken frame from a failed startup (Beepi) I bought the car from, so I feel like it kinda adds some Silicon Valley character to the car. LOL
It’s also screwed on using one-way screws so I’ll have to figure out how to remove those.
As it is, the convention that vehicles already sport their manufacturer’s branding plastered on both the front and back is already obnoxious.
Public roads cannot be traversed without seeing dozens, hundreds or thousands of instances of $CAR_BRAND.
I suppose that makes me a proponent of debranding, wherein company logos and emblems are removed.
I think in the UK legally you have to have the manufacturer of the registration plate on it to combat fraud / cloning. But it’s tiny text you can only see close up
deleted by creator
This pisses me off so hard, I refuse to buy apparel that has anything more than a logo on it. I am giving you my money for your design, I’m not paying you to be a walking billboard I’m paying you to have clothing on my body. It’s becoming increasingly harder nowadays to buy clothing that doesn’t have a quarter of the item taken up by some sort of brand name on it it’s ugly as shit and annoying
I’ve recently had to forgo my favorite style because you can no longer find it without having it plastered with brand or logo, it’s just a simple pair of sweatpants with a racing stripe down the side it does not need a brand name that takes quarter of the leg
If you like nice shirts with no design or logo, Kohl’s has some really comfortable shirts in several colors and no logo at all. They’re some of my favorite shirts right now.
I also like Uniqlo for comfortable clothing with no logos on them.
I have like 2 dozen of their super soft tees. Pick 'em up for like $12 in a variety of colors. One of the only big department stores that has XLT as a size as well.
The cheaper the item, the bigger the brand.
Store brand tshirts from places like C&A are often entirely plain, meanwhile expensive brands like Gucci are all about plastering their logo everywhere. I’d be surprised if Gucci shirts actually had lower production costs than C&A shirts.
There’s a difference between consumer luxury goods and actual luxury goods which are typically unbranded and bespoke.
My rule of thumb is, if I’ve heard of it (outside of my niches), it’s not actually a high end brand
Sure, but the comic is about your “consumer luxury goods”.
Even brands like gucci and their line up, their entry level will have bigger brand logos, because they know people who buy entry level gucci are people who want to show the world they have gucci. Real rich people will buy something more cleaner looking.
Sounds like rich people are paying to get the ads removed.
Not necessarily. The big fashion brands are about just that: fashion. Of course, some use the logo as a pattern, like Louis Vuitton.
The lower tier products are for people who can’t afford the high end stuff but want to own something “Gucci” or “Fendi” or “Chanel.” Those t-shirts with the logos emblazoned on them are either the high end brands exploiting an easier revenue stream or knock-offs. Make no mistake, Gucci isn’t above charging average people $80 to $100 for a T-shirt!
The bigger the cushion, the sweeter the pushin
Me in my fancy Kirkland Signature t-shirt:
An individual with refinement and culture
Dude at least pick a cool brand that has unique designs and art for each shirt like O’Neil, quicksilver, Roxy etc. Fuck I think even Hollister and clones had cite branded shirts.
Now it’s a red box that says Supreme. And apparently is lucrative because their website is closed? I’m too stoned for this shit
My favorite brand is Gildan, because they seem to have a monopoly on (metal) band shirts.
My second favorite is Volcom, because they work with local artists to make beautiful designs for their apparel.
VOLCOM!!! Thank you that’s the brand my mind was reaching for but couldn’t remember. Great designs, cool to learn they work with local artists!
I work in a sportswear store and only buy things that are on sale so I get heavy discounts on Nike, Adidas, Puma, New Balance, etc.
These brands are pretty much ubiquitous anyway so I’m not particularly bothered about wearing their products. One thing is for sure though, I won’t go around telling everyone how great big corporation is.
Certainly can’t argue with the comic!
It’s is truly fucked up how corporations figured out how to sell their own ads.
Time to mention Bill Hicks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHEOGrkhDp0
edit: wow, turning an image into a hyperlink is silly in Markdown
Ironic how that video is blocked in the US due to copyright.
Thank you, always worth a rewatch.
The fact that it’s blocked under US copyright when the opening phrase is literally " if anyone here is in advertising or marketing kill yourself" speaks wonders about the state of our country. I would expect it to be something like inciting violence or inciting harm not fucking US copyright lol
The obvious difference is, someone, somewhere out there will see you wearing/using that luxury brand and think “ooo, fancy”, and thus will think you are more “refined” for it. Whether you agree with that or not, that’s the reality.
nobody is going to think you’re more refined for watching a YouTube ad.
Someone will think you’re more refined if you don’t watch a YouTube ad though, whether it’s through ad blocker or premium, that’s the comparison you should be making.
True, but I do get irrationally mad if someone else wants to show me something and there are several ads before it.
When I see people plastered with logos I just think they’re dumb and incapable of independent thought.
Or less refined…
Be the ad you want to see in the world
laughs in my white Kanye t-shirt.
You got me I pay to be an ad for a co-op i volunteer at
they pay me $13 an hour to be a walking Publix ad 😔
I had to ask my mom to kindly not buy me Aeropostale, or other brands that are in your face and ugly like this. I don’t even like those brands. I have always been the jeans and band t shirt guy, or just a plain tee. I’m 40 by the way but moms never stop buying us shirts.
My mother once convinced me to accept a Fender T-shirt from her (I’m more of an Ibanez guy, but still better than Gibson), otherwise unless people pay me I won’t wear an “advertisement” T-shirt.
I don’t mind wearing shirts with brands on em, just not clothing brands. I love wearing tshirts with old company logos or weird stuff like froot loops or a vintage coca cola shirt.
