• 5 Posts
  • 695 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle









  • thanks_shakey_snaketoWikipedia@lemmy.worldGish gallop
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ben Shapiro is exactly who I’ve heard this in reference to. In his case, it’s like an avalanche of “facts” and stats and stuff, which may be real in some sense or have some grain of truth, but it’s not like you’re going to be able to fact check them on the spot, or look at the data with the appropriate care and nuance to figure out how to interpret it… He just looks informed and the opponent looks baffled so he wins I guess.

    Donald Trump on the other hand just does this free-associating stream of consciousness rambling that I’m not sure is even lucid enough to count… Like I don’t think he’s usually trying to mount arguments or seem like “the smartest in the room” the way Ben Shapiro is, he just… Says stuff.









  • Tbh I think alot of the “thinking” still looks like visible work though. I feel like the article makes it seem a little too much like there’s nothing observable, nothing to show or demonstrate, until POOF the code comes out.

    But I find that I often need to be doing visible stuff to make progress… Like devising little experiments and running them to check my assumptions about the system (or discover something new about it), and making little incremental changes, running them, using the output to guide the next thing I do… Even occasionally spending the time to write a failing test that I plan to make pass.

    So I’m 100% on board with letting managers believe this “80% of the work is invisible” thing… But I think as advice for programmers, it’s really important to not get too stuck in your head and spend too much time not kinetically interacting with the system that you’re trying to change.