• OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      8 months ago

      I find it’s easier to explain this to people as “Southern conservatives used to vote Democrat, now they vote Republican”.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, the idea of a sudden swap is simplistic. The New Deal coalition included white Southerners and a substantial number of Black people and people who were otherwise prone to being sympathetic to Black civil rights. Certain dynamics protected the spot of Dixiecrats, but the contradictions were just too great for the party to hold together forever. It was a simple matter of absorbing the disaffected Dixiecrats.

    • valek879@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      But I’d rather look at what modern people are doing and saying.

      We would too but unfortunately fascists pretend that they’re not fascist by claiming their political party freed the slaves.

      This obviously ignores their bigotry and hate for people of color and distaste for women… And well, I digress. Suffice to say that these assholes try to claim they’re not racist despite all the racist bullshit and hate they spread, and they use this claim as proof.

      We would love to ignore it but we can’t. Best we can do is inform ourselves.

  • someguy3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wish I followed this advice earlier. The way I’ve heard it was: “When someone tells you who they are, believe them.”

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      From an interview with Oprah Winfrey in 1997:

      When you look at that process of waiting on somebody who has told you they were going to do something and told you they were going to be there for you and they were not, they are showing you in that moment exactly who they are. That means that’s somebody who cannot be trusted. So why would you the next time trust that person?

      So, Maya Angelou said to me, when I was telling her one of these stories about, “I’m waiting and I couldn’t believe it and he didn’t call me and I don’t know what happened,” she was saying, “My dear,” in her Maya voice, “My dear, when people show you who they are, why don’t you believe them? Why must you be shown 29 times before you can see who they really are? Why can’t you get it the first time?”

      And so the adjunct of that is, when people show you who they are, believe them the first time. Don’t wait for the twenty-ninth time."

      The full quote is “When people show who you who they are, believe them the first time.”

      Which I think is the best version of the quote, honestly. We’ve been letting conservatives scream about who they are without really believing them for 70 fucking years now. Now they’re not even afraid to put on a mask, they’ve gone fully mask-off on abuse and racism. This is what you get by enabling them through not believing them the first time. To me that’s the further issue that Angelou didn’t touch on. You’re enabling that behavior by treating them as though they will somehow magically change. For Oprah it was assuming that man would suddenly start calling and treating her right. For the US political establishment it’s for assuming conservatives are operating in good faith.

      (It is Oprah Winfrey rephrasing statements she had been told by Maya Angelou. So the quote often gets attributed to them both, but I would consider it a Winfrey quote simply because she’s paraphrasing someone else, using her own words.)

      (Also, while the quote is good and Maya Angelou is good. Fuck Oprah Winfrey and all the fucking snake oil peddling freaks she promotes.)

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 months ago

          So… You shouldn’t take past behavior as an indication of future behavior?

          I think it’s good advice. Saves a lot of time

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        What you all need to realize is, those last 70 years have been DEMOCRATS showing you who they are: Useful idiots for the truly evil Republicans.

        Yet no one believes it despite that being the only thing Democrats do… Obama Care is a Republican plan from Mitt Romney from the 90’s. Biden is now ALSO screeching about “securing the border”…

        Democrats are the blissfully unaware idiots helping evil people, and nobody believes it.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Right, the affordable care act ISN’T based on Mitt Romney’s plan, and Biden totally didn’t say, “give me the ability to close the border and I’ll do it!”.

            Ya’ll are in fucking denial and it’s beyond pathetic. The fascists are winning because you’re too fucking weak to understand that the Dems have been the “good cop” to the Republicans’ bad cop for decades.

            Again, grow up and engage with the real world before it’s too late.

            I am NOT saying, “don’t vote for Biden over Trump”. I’m saying, “don’t trust Biden to fix much without GREAT pressure.”. Yet you fucks cannot even hear the basic truth that not even the Dems are your friend unless you make a HEALTHY six figures or more. Pathetic. Fucking Pathetic.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          8 months ago

          I didn’t say them by name, but Democrats are who I was thinking about when I discussed how pretending they are operating in good faith is enabling that behavior.

          Democrats enable Conservative criminality, because they play an endless shell-game of “but they’re really operating in good faith this time, we promise. We just need to reach across the aisle get a reach-around.”

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            “If we ‘meet them in the middle’ and shift a mile to the right for the 3,041st time, they’ll totally meet us in the middle THIS TIME instead of sprinting another two miles to the right like they have every other time, we swear!”

            I understand the panic in marginalized communities and them saying if dems don’t win they’re going to be fucked now, but they don’t get that we’re only a couple election cycles from democrats throwing them under the bus same as Republicans.

            • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well, if my options to get dragged to the camps is either right now or in a few election cycles, I’m on the side of it taking longer.

              • Facebones@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                I would think people would prefer “not being dragged to camps at all” but everybody keeps voting for “yes to camps but in 4 years”

                Just weird to me but go off I guess. 🤷

                • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Well, I voted Biden in 2020, and here we are four years later and I ain’t in a camp yet. Kind of seems like that’s an inaccurate prediction, and you would be served by considering the chain of reasoning that led you to this pass, to see what improvements might be made in your process to enable better predictions in the future. Not every change is an improvement, but every improvement is a change.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yep! They don’t have to have evil intent themselves to never the less still effectively be the “good cop” accomplice to the Republican’s bad cop.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    I say we compromise and carve “LOSER” on every single monument. You still get your statues but everyone knows you’re a fuckin loser.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    Pretty standard right wing whataboutism lol “bu-bu-but what about this thing that happen 150 years ago??? Clearly the Democratic party still wants slavery!!!”

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      All the racist democrats left the party to join the Republican Party when democrats voted to give black peoples rights.

  • Bleys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Whenever someone pulls out the “dEmOcRaTs WeRe ThE cOnFeDeRaTeS” argument, you know they’re either dumb as fuck or arguing entirely in bad faith. Like bro the parties switched in the 1960s it’s just names at this point.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Saying the parties “switched” is a large oversimplification. But yes, as the Democrats became anti segregation, it had dissatisfied white, racist, voters in the south. Of which Republicans, were all too happy to cater to, thus the “switch”.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago
      1964 Civil Rights Act Senate Version Ayes Democrats Republicans
      House 153 of 244 (63%) 136 of 171 (80%)
      Senate 46 of 67 (69%) 27 of 33 (82%)
      1964 Civil Rights Act Senate Version Ayes Union Confederacy
      House 281 of 313 (90%) 8 of 102 (8%)
      Senate 72 of 78 (92%) 1 of 22 (5%)
      1964 Civil Rights Act Senate Version Ayes Dem/Union Rep/Union Dem/Confed Rep/Confed
      House 145 of 152 (95%) 136 of 161 (85%) 8 of 91 (9%) 0 of 11 (0%)
      Senate 45 of 46 (98%) 27 of 32 (84%) 1 of 21 (5%) 0 of 1 (0%)

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/republicans-party-of-civil-rights

      All I’m sayin’

  • TehWorld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    A close friend was raised in the Carolinas. They were taught that the civil war was about “states rights”. It wasn’t until they were an adult that they did their own looking into what “rights” the southern states were fighting for. It really opened my eyes to how the blinders have been put on so many people. I’m 100% sure that I have my own set, but it’s important to remember, and engage these people when you have an opportunity.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    What? A bad faith argument from the right? I can’t believe it… took this long to hit 1 million.