• MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Yeah but it’s too realistic, I want something convenient! Let me read one book and gain the power to create floating ice! Not read like 5 giant books and stufy for years so that I can create a microwave 😔

    No shade to microwaves, one of my favorite magic items

  • Machinist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Only thing dumber than a mechanical engineer is an electrical engineer trying to design a housing.

    You want to understand the deep magic, talk to electricians and technicians.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yup. Thing is, it’s known that ‘machinists’ coming out of trade school aren’t worth a damn for years. The same is true of enginneers, yet they turn them loose on CAD and they create designs that make everyone miserable.

        This is one of the big problems with SpaceX/Blue Origin/Firefly. The designs are piss poor because the majority of their engineers are green.

        Engineers shouldn’t have design authority until they’ve spent a few years manufacturing.

        • sartalon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          They are required to have a minimum of three years of design experience and have to pass a PE exam before they are allowed to verify their own designs.

          Up until that point, all of their designs are required to be sealed by another PE.

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            My bad, not design authority as that’s a specific thing. They are allowed to design and the guy rubber-stamping often doesn’t catch much.

            Ultimately, this is a religious issue. Engineers are heathens that should be burned at the stake. Occasionally, you meet a good one who’s been housetrained by the people that actually do the things.

            • sartalon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I can say the opposite. I have had craft, in the field, make design choices without engaging the engineer, and now the client is angry because shit isn’t working right, because someone made a command decision in a silo.

              Drawings are never perfect. Most of the time, engineers are working off client provided drawings that aren’t very accurate, so the assumptions are bad when the shovel hits the ground.

              That is neither the craft, nor the engineer’s fault.

              I am an EE and I can’t magically know that the last guy to hang an antenna put it 10’ higher than he was supposed to and the client doesn’t want to pay for a site visit.

              So now my tower climber is pissed because he has to make multiple climbs, take photos and then wait with his thumb up his butt, while I am trying to get the client to agree to a plan, and he is going to blame me.

              Now I am a Construction Manager, and I get pissed at the engineer when he provides drawings that don’t give even half the info I need.

              I’ll buy the material, no problem, but you need to give me a fucking BoM because I don’t know what your design criteria is and I am not going to guess.

              I’m sure as hell not going to let my craft buy whatever coax connection is available, and fits, to connect a feedline.

              They don’t know what actually goes into that.

              Likewise, an engineer can’t tell if an existing conduit has enough room to snake a new cable because the cable schedule isn’t always accurate. But then my craft doesn’t know how to calculate conduit fill b because they don’t know the types/level of voltages in the existing lines.

              I have also NEVER known an electrician who, when first laying eyes on a job, not complain about the terrible work performed by the previous electrician.

              Working brownfields is always going to be a pain and everyone loves to bitch when the job ends up being harder than it should have been.

              I will say this. I love being a construction manager 100 times more than being an engineer, but having that background is fucking invaluable because I can spot problems from further away and can usually resolve them quickly.

    • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I mean, yea. The people designing the AC to DC power supplies often don’t care what you use them for, why would they bother putting schematics for a real load on their diagram?

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      That’s not a resistor it’s actually a BIG LOAD. The diagram would better show it as a reactive load (usually just a rectangle) since most real loads are reactive. Get it?

      • vithigar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s a basic AC rectifier, the resistor represents an arbitrary DC load. You use similar circuits all the time, though generally with additional failsafes and some mechanism of smoothing out the rectified current.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Clarke’s Maxim: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      Corollary / Contrapositive: Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      While it helps the ritual it isn’t strictly required, so it can be easier for an apprentice to achieve.

            • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The trouble is that even the consciousness maintenance needs power. If the power is out for too long the infrastructure is too damaged. So it actually does return when you turn it off. It just has to be done quickly enough.

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                That’s why electroconvulsive therapy uses pulses of about a millisecond. But, then, it’s not actually turning the power off, ECT is more of a warm reset of consciousness.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    When we figure out how to manipulate elctro-weak at scale, it will be magic.

    Electro-mag is pretty crazy already, I agree. The ICP can’t even figure out how they work.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        When the environment is energetic enough, the electromagnetic force and the weak force unify into the electroweak force. The weak interaction controls radioactive decay.

        We can control electromagnetic force “at scale”, IMO. It’s not freely, but we have networks of electromagnetic systems that span continents.

        If we could control the weak force at the same scale… I’m not sure what wonders we might unlock. At the very least, I imagine we could “clean” instead of just “contain” radioactive waste, at least low-level stuff.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          If we had control over the weak force:

          • We can likely turn elements into other elements at will
          • We can manufacture safe decay sources for a new class of nuclear energy
          • We can probably create safe “decay batteries” tuned to their specific use cases. Batteries that last for tens of thousands the lifespan of current chemical ones.
          • Potentially engineer with neutrinos. Imagine communication via neutrinos, you could transmit straight through the earth.

          I mean, with control over matter like that, at the scale of electricity, Star Trek matter replicators would be a thing.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Said it before and I’ll say it again: just because you understand the magic doesn’t make it any less magical. A wizard may know the ins and outs of their spells, but they’re still spells. Our entire universal is fucking magical, we just happen to have a decent understanding of why (some) of it functions the way it does. Jiggle a quark here and another may jiggle the same way somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse, that’s fucking wild and magical and incredible, and just because we have some level of understanding behind the mechanics doesn’t make it not magic. It just makes it a hard magic system.