Hopefully this kind of post isn’t too tired, but I figure it’s my turn:

Finally decided to, after absolutely refusing to upgrade to 11, make the jump from Win10 to Linux! Been hopping around distros a bit and landed on EndeavourOS last night and I’m really enjoying it so far.

It’s definitely tinkery and took me like 2 hours just to get my push to talk working in Discord (mostly due to my own lack of knowledge), but I love the level of control of everything you have (was on Pop!_OS before 🤮, edit: no hate, just wasn’t for me!)

There’s definitely never been a better time to switch and I’m very excited for when I inevitably brick my shit and come back here for help, so thanks in advance everyone! :)

  • typhoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Clicked in this post because of the wallpaper.

    Stayed here for the polemic.

    Searching the wallpaper, now.

  • BlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yea im about to switch myself. Been looking at suggestions and stuff, probably gonna start with Mint myself.

    Many different sources advise putting it on a flashdrive first and loading from there, to start. Make sure I like it.

    But the end goal, eventually, would be to remove windows from the comp entirely, right? Eventually installing my chosen distro as the OS on the computer itself? Does that sound about right?

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      For me, I’ve been throwing distros on a spare SSD so I could test run in a proper install, but I’m sure a thumbdrive would be fine. Just keep in mind that you might get some hangs and things will be slower due to the speed of the drive, rather than the inefficiencies of the OS you end up on. If you want to test out specific programs or games or something, you can always do what I did and put them on a separate faster storage drive (I’m on SATA SSD for my OS right now, but am putting other things on NVME).

      As I mentioned elsewhere, I still have my Windows on another drive so I can boot to it if I need to, but I honestly haven’t needed to even once since switching, so I’ll probably end up just switching to VM only for anything that requires Windows fairly soon here.

      The transition has been much simpler and smoother than I ever had imagined.

  • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve been using EndeavourOS for awhile now and it’s really good. Everything more or less just works.

  • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    EndeavourOS is great. It’s as bare as you can get without opting for straight Arch. I bit the bullet on vanilla Arch a couple weeks ago, though, and am amazed at how easy it is to set up now.

    Bonus: I can follow the Arch Wiki word for word without having to cross check things.

    But I loved my time with EOS. I would probably still be using it if I hadn’t decided to fuck around with topgrade while having no idea what I was doing. The lesson of the day was just update normally… its built in for a reason.

    Edit: Look up Timeshift and ALWAYS back up personal files to external. There’s a reason Arch is notorious for being unstable. Sometimes just an update can bork everything (still very rare, though).

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Glad you are enjoying Arch. I agree, it is no longer hard to install.

      Do you have an example of something in the Arch wiki that does not apply to EOS?

      I mean, I guess most people self-installing Arch are not choosing Dracut (though you could and the Arch wiki covers it). I cannot really think of anything else though.

      • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This is basically true. EOS is the closest to vanilla Arch that just runs a gui live with Calamares.

        The only difference is the bundled dependencies and packages. EOS sets a lot of those for you out of the gate. That’s what I meant about cross referencing. Sometimes I had to look and see what dependency/library EOS used and then pull it up in the wiki.

        In base Arch you make some of those choices yourself, so you can just start at the top of the wiki page instead browsing to where EOS left things.

        It’s not a negative thing. I’m just learning from the ground up on the wiki instead of jumping into the middle of things. For example, I had to go through and pick which bluetooth and sound packages I wanted and EOS has them sorted out for you. Small things like that.

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    EndeavourOS club! Gorgeous blend between granular control and reasonably configured initial guardrails for a willing-to-learn new Arch user.

    I played around with other distros too, before settling into this one. Haven’t looked back after 2-3 years of use.

  • Vopyr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been hopping between different distros since 2023, but every time I come back to EndeavourOS, this distro seems to work the best for me, haven’t had any problems with this distro.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s amazing! Why shit on Pop!_OS though? I’ve always liked it. I think it’s definitely more stable than Arch in the long term

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Honestly, it seems really stable and works great, I just hate how…hand holdy it felt for me personally. I think the emoji was a little over the top. My apologies, haha. It’s totally fine for what it is, and if it works for you, that’s fantastic!

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I don’t love the aesthetic of Pop OS out of the box but with a minimal set of GNOME extensions I really like it. Which actually, is the case for me on vanilla GNOME too.

        I’d like to be an Arch person, but on the only device I’ve used it on, I’ve had some major breakages happen a couple of times. Took months for the issues to get resolved. Which honestly, as hard as software is, let alone OSes, is a great track record. Most teams could only keep stability specifically with these long/major release schedules like everyone else essentially does it.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Right now, I still have Windows as dual boot in case things go sideways or I run into road blocks with work, but my plan is to move all of that to a VM in the near future (and ideally an actual work supplied machine with a KVM eventually). At that point, I could see myself falling back onto something like Pop!_OS as a stable side install if/when my main OS is having issues and I just want to play a game and not bash my head against a console for 5 hours.

          Sorry to be so seemingly unfair to Pop OS, what it does it does do quite well, just not for me as a main driver.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it’s very stable for what it is. But I still had it break remote desktop, wifi functionality, and something about graphics that caused weird glitches in Firefox. These issues all took months to fix, each. For most tech savvy people it’s probably stable enough but for the less common hardware, the only reason I could keep using and updating it was by leveraging timeshift. I would update everything, test if my issue was solved, see it still present then rollback. I did that process dozens of times.

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have never had anything in Arch take months to fix. One tip I would have is to use both the latest kernel and an LTS. If something “breaks” with a kernel module, just boot into LTS and it is probably fine there. I also had an issue with WiFi for about a week but a quick reboot into LTS and I was good to go immediately. When I tried the latest kernel two weeks later, it had been fixed there. Something similar happened with my FaceTimeHD camera. Same solution.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Hmm, I’m not aware of those tracks or how they work. I only really was able to install arch from a specific guide because the device is a raspberry pi 5

    • seat6@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      yeah; I also use Pop!_OS and like it. I’m curious about the reasoning here

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The only thing I don’t like about it is being behind on gnome since their DE is a forked older version of gnome afaik. Especially for recent gnome extensions, it’s not always the most amenable. But mostly even on that front it’s workable

  • Charger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Welcome to your GNU/Linux jounery.

    Before you distro hop again, take your time exploring the os and terminal it will make installing the real arch linux easier.

    • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      EndeavourOS is the real Arch, with some additional repos and some sensible defaults.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        What makes an Arch system an Arch system is the repos, the package manager and the fact that you installed it yourself.
        Anyone giving you support will expect you to be able to answer a couple of questions about your system based on the fact you yourself configured it.
        With EndeavourOS, even if you have the exact same repos, it still wouldn’t be an Arch system.
        And now get off my lawn!

        • Vopyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Archinstall: Exists Someone: ArCh iS WhEN yOu iNStaLl It yOUrsELf.

          In other words, this statement is bullshit.

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 day ago

            There is no irony.
            Gatekeeping Linux distros has been a time-honored tradition since 1993.

            • trevor (he/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 day ago

              Fuck that. The Linux gate is wide open! Anyone that wants to use Linux, come on in!

              And for your own sake: use anything but Ubuntu and their buggy Snaps.

        • k4j8@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mostly agree with this. If you’re asking for help on an Arch forum, I think it’s fair to expect you know how your system is installed and configured. However, we know many use EndeavourOS (or Archinstall) to avoid having to configure their system. Forums provide free support; I think it’s fair they get a say in what issues they don’t want to deal with.

      • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Try saying that on the Arch forums and see what they think about that statement.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Arch users do not consider EOS as Arch but it absolutely is.

            EndeavourOS uses the vanilla Arch kernels, the vanilla Arch repos, and the AUR. There are only a handful of packages in the EOS repos and the majority of them are theming or utils that are what you would use on Arch as well (like yay and paru). There are a few quality of life utils that are totally optional and most EOS users are probably not even aware of. Plus, I suppose, the EOS keyring and a couple of packages so that the distro identifies as EOS instead of Arch. Distro identification is the only thing that “overrrides” anything in the Arch repos.

            I describe EOS as an opinionated Arch installer with sensible defaults. Once installed, it is just Arch.

            It is trivial to revert EOS to vanilla Arch if you want to. I don’t think it even requires a reboot.

          • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            These boards are for the support of Arch Linux, and Arch ONLY. If you have installed Archbang, Artix, Chakra, EndeavourOS, Evo/Lution, Manjaro, Whatever, you are NOT running Arch Linux. Source

            • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Sounds like something written at the likes of Manjaro which differ enough from plain Arch for it to be problematic.

              To be honest, with EOS the point is moot - they have their own excellent forums and if you do insist on going to the Arch forums, just say you’re using Arch.

        • Vopyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Whatever. Why should anyone even go to their forum and ask their opinion on EndeavourOS (or other Arch-based distros) when their community is known for its toxicity?

          • StefanT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Ever tried asking in Ubuntu forums for help for Mint, Pop or any other derived distribution?

            It might be toxic but I understand if people that donate their free time to help others get tired of being asked for help for problems that were caused by the offspring distribution. I did not follow it nowadays but back in the days this was the same with Manjaro which caused issues every now and then by holding back some upgrades.

          • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not about opinion, it’s about the fact you can’t go to the Arch forums in case you are running into issues while running Endeavour. Whether that’s an issue or not is up to the user.

  • ColdWater
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Welcome aboard, I also first started with beginners friendly distro (around 1 years ago), Fedora is my first ever distro then I started distro hopping and landed on vanilla Arch, that’s what I’m stick with until now

  • nfreak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve always sworn by Arch builds. Built one up from scratch back in college ten years ago, and this past winter I decided I wanted to try a linux box again. After a bit of distro hopping I settled on CachyOS, but Endeavor caught my eye too.

    Shit breaks, but fixing it is a learning experience. Small price to pay in exchange for the customization it offers.

    • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shit breaks but when it does there is a well documented wiki to help you fix it rather than multitude of vaguely related ubuntu forum posts

      • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ugh I still run Ubuntu LTS on my living room HTPC, and generally it’s fine. But on the occasion I need to fix something, I swear every seemingly relevant forum post is from 2015 or earlier. It’s maddening.

  • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I test-ran EndeavourOS for a future PC and like it. I am a Steam gamer though, so my work’s cut out for me in getting it to work on whatever hardware I choose.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Steam works absolutely perfectly on EndeavourOS. No tweaking or anything required, just install and run. It also runs just about any game I ever tried, with troubleshooting as easy as choosing a different version of Proton from the dropdown.

      • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Another confirmation that Endeavour is great with Steam. However I did have to follow the Arch wiki to install the correct Mesa drivers on my new PC (Radeon RX 7800 XT), as without those the GPU performance was crap.

    • Mesophar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you were a non-steam gamer you’d have a little extra work cut out for you, but steam literally runs natively