Glynn Simmons, 71, who was released in July after prosecutors agreed that key evidence in his case was not turned over to his defense lawyers, was ruled innocent Tuesday.

“This court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the offense for which Mr. Simmons was convicted, sentenced and imprisoned… was not committed by Mr. Simmons,” according to the ruling by Oklahoma County District Judge Amy Palumbo.

The ruling makes Simmons eligible for up to $175,000 in compensation from the state for wrongful conviction and opens the door for a federal lawsuit against Oklahoma City and law enforcement involved in Simmons’ arrest and conviction, defense attorney Joe Norwood said Wednesday.

Compensation, though, is likely years away, Norwood said and Simmons is currently living on donations while undergoing treatment for cancer that was detected after his release from prison.

“Glynn is having to live off of GoFundMe, that’s literally how the man is surviving right now, paying rent, buying food,” Norwood said. “Getting him compensation, and getting compensation is not for sure, is in the future and he has to sustain himself now.”

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        We have very lax medical marijuana laws, a dispensary on every corner, and cheap weed.

        We sure do have a lot of willfully stupid people, though.

        • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          It would be nice if you’d amend those lax medical marijuana laws to allow us Texas residents in on the deal.

          • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nope. You guys have been telling us how much better you are since 1909. You get your own weed. 🤣

        • Atom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Not really, just decent ranching land mainly. There’s a reason the US was willing to briefly give it away to the Native Americans.

    • Duranie@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      A while back I had a cousin living in Oklahoma. He had some troubles and was hanging out with some not great people. An acquaintance’s gf/wife ended up dead and the guy pointed his finger at my cousin. He was held in jail charged with murder, but all his hearings kept getting kicked down the road. After a year they released him and told him to GTFO of the state and never return.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which, to me, screams that they found evidence he didnt do it, but didnt want to invest money in a trial to prove his innocence, or on finding the actual suspect.

  • TechyDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    6 months ago

    $175,000 for 50 years? He’s 71 now so he went into prison at 21. That means he spent virtually his entire life in prison. He could have done so many things, but instead he needed to sit in a prison cell. All because he was wrongly convicted.

    And because I’m a math geek and need to figure this stuff out, $175,000 over 50 years is $3,500 a year. If we calculate what he would have earned at the federal minimum wage over that time frame (ignoring bank account interest or inflation just to keep things simple), we’d get over $500,000.

    They’re giving him a third of what he should have earned at bare minimum. (And that ignores all the other horrible things involved with being wrongfully imprisoned for 50 years.)

    • LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah. The sum they owe him should be a “whoops we fucked up badly, sorry. Take these 175k while we think about what you could have made if we didn’t. It’s just to get you started, there’ll be more next month.”

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      When you did your calculations did you factor in the change in minimum wage and inflation? I’m sure the state owes him more than $500k.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I didn’t factor in inflation as I was trying to keep it quick and simple. I also didn’t factor in any interest he might have received from a bank account. This was purely “he works minimum wage and stuffs all the cash he gets into a big jar - how much does he have after 50 years.”

        I was also using the federal minimum wage. Obviously, many states have higher minimum wages so he might have made more than the federal minimum wage had he been free to move to another state.

        Of course, the $500,000 figure only accounts for money that he would have made. It doesn’t include all the suffering he had to endure or the fact that the state basically ended his life at 21. He didn’t get to live his life and his future life is going to be rough. Not only does he need to adjust to life out of prison, but he likely has nothing. It’s not like many places are rushing to hire a 71 year old with no job experience for the last 50 years because they were in prison. The money he gets should at least be enough for him to comfortably retire.

        • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          This man likely does not have children or any close family left. He’s probably very alone out here and I’d argue that he was better off in prison, as sad as it sounds. In prison he would have had a carr to look after him, guards that (on paper) have to keep him safe, three meals a day, and a life he’s already used to. He literally has no experience on living on the outside as an adult and like no support system.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      6 months ago

      Compensation, though, is likely years away, Norwood said and Simmons is currently living on donations while undergoing treatment for cancer that was detected after his release from prison.

      Reminds me of that joke, what did the wrongfully convicted man, who spent 50 years in prison because a prosecutor hid exonerating evidence, get for Christmas? Cancer.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        The world is a chaotic, horrid unforgiving place. Have fun while you can because any second now who the fuck knows what’s going to happen to any of us.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I get what you’re saying, but I’ve also seen similar sentiment used to justify cruelty, as if the unpredictable nature of existence somehow absolves people of actively contributing to the misery of others.

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Prosecutor is probably dead of old age. And if thats the case, I vote we dig them up

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      the fact that they’re gonna fight him on it until he dies is part of the fun, too. he’ll never see a nickel of the pittance he’s entitled to because the state arbitrarily stole and discarded most of his life.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 months ago

    Time to play a game: Without opening the article, guess Mr. Simmons’ skin color.

    You almost certainly guessed correctly.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t understand why cases like this aren’t the only rationale needed to abolish the death penalty.

    Also, that poor man - I hope he is able to live as happy a life as can be expected given the injustice that he endured.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because death penalty supporters are okay with killing innocents if they get to feel retribution and kill someone, regardless of “justice”.

      • spider@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        And prosecutors who intentionally withhold evidence in cases like this and death penalty cases are also “taking someone’s life”, so to speak. They’re no better than cold-blooded killers.

        (Speaking of which, if only the State of Florida would stop f**king around with Tommy Zeigler.)

        • Xhieron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Lawyer here: Lock’em up. Maybe this is a radical position, but these kinds of cases demonstrate the need to do away with absolute immunity for prosecutors and judges. Qualified immunity would be more appropriate, and unlike with police, there’s never a question whether judges and prosecutors know their obligations. If you withhold evidence in order to take another man’s freedom and it can be proved against you, you should go to the penitentiary, full stop. And if you sell kids to prisons in exchange for kickbacks, you should be hanged.

          This is part of the problem with having a self-regulated profession. As much as I appreciate that the ethical rules to which I’m beholden are created by people who are similarly educated and have experience with the practice of the profession, we’re well past the point that good lawyers and judges need to be holding bad ones genuinely accountable. 50 years of a man’s life isn’t worth a law license or a term on the bench. It’s not even fucking close. If you want prosecutors to stop fucking around with evidence and you want judges to stop taking bribes, their legal responsibilities need to have the same teeth as the ones they wield against others. You perpetrate a fraud on the court and it costs an innocent man 50 years–you go to jail for 50 years. Lex talionis.

          And if that kind of standard means people don’t want to be prosecutors? Well, people who want to be able to withhold evidence shouldn’t be prosecutors!

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        No it’s because it should only be used in the most cut and dry cases.

        Cases like Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy, Hitler, Putin, Stalin.

        Killing someone because they killed one person or did some heinous thing once is not a good solution.

        Killing someone who has shown they do not care about human life to the point of killing multiple people either directly or indirectly is completely morally sound.

  • Rosco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    State takes your freedom for the majority of your life on a mistake, the reparation is not even enough to buy a fucking house, and it has to wait years for it. If they wanted to make fun of him one last time, they should have just given him a “Get Well Soon” card for his cancer, that would have been less cruel.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Let’s treat imprisonment of the innocent as if it were their job while they were in prison.

      Since they can’t ever leave they’re always engaged to wait so need to be paid 24/7, which comes out to 232 hours a week after the overtime bump. Take that money, throw it in the market with an average 5% return and run the numbers

      At 7.25 (current minimum wage) it’d be around 8 million.

      Take the hourly rate of the median individual income, and it’s 80 million.

      The state apparently values an innocent person’s freedom at 17 cents an hour.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bastards could have done him the favor of just killing him. A life of suffering. Shame.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I have no words…

    Edit: It always amazes me when small government advocates who believe government is fundamentally incompetent rant and rave about the necessity and righteousness of government being able to death penalty you (or the “right” people)…

  • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    now imagine he was executed for it. you can free a man after 50 years, but you can’t revive him.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    Given how long he was in prison this is close to edging the death penalty in the slowest most painful way possible. Which is by keeping you incarcerated until the day you die…

  • LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    That sum is way too low, way too late and way too uncertain. What a fucking shame. He should spend the rest of his life in luxury with every wish fulfilled without even thinking about it. What a fucking shame!