• SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    (Mass dislikes time!)

    Yes, the US does evil shit in the Middle East. Killing brown-skinned practitioners of the other Abrahamic religion overseas is an American tradition.

    That still doesn’t change the fact that China is persecuting Uyghurs in the Xinjiang province.

    You can’t shit-talk one authoritarian state and cheer on another.

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Our genocides are the good genocides” thinking persisting this long is baffling. Even more disturbing is these people are in power.

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is it though? People hear what they want to hear and believe what they want to believe. No one wants to believe that their privileges are predicated on suffering elsewhere.

      Westerners in particularly have always been very “heads in the sand” when it comes to modern history but it’s not surprising. Every nation struggles with the darker aspects of their history.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    We’re very butthurt about our failed color revolution, and we’re very concerned that we can’t even manage to make lemonade out of our lemon.

    Westerners, every time:

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Genocide is bad. If your ideology prevents you from agreeing with that statement, you are a monster.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Nobody here is denying that genocide is bad, what’s in question is what the US Empire says is happening vs what is actually happening. The US Empire has lied before, such as the babies taken from incubators story or Iraq’s WMD, but it was only long after the dust had begun to settle in Iraq that the liberals started to agree with the leftists that the evidence was actually insufficient after all.

    • jankforlife@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Genocide IS bad, but the “muslim genocide” in China is nothing but a CIA op, as usual

  • narwhal@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    The people that try to equate fake genocide with real genocide are like the school staff punishing bully and victim alike. They are enabling the abuses. Also it must be deeply insulting to the real victims in gaza.

      • narwhal@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Where is the evidence? This article is an interview showing two people telling stories, one of which is selling a book, just like Yeonmi Park.
        I can too volunteer for an interview as I tell how Greenland is genociding left handed people. But nobody will ever want to pay me for that.

          • narwhal@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Genocides are real things, so it’s important we reliably identify them with factual evidence, not falling for atrocity propaganda. Incorrectly identifying something as genocide is irresponsible much like denying a case of genocide that is actually taking place.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Seriously.

          The time jordanlund came here to make an ass of himself about the “Uyghur genocide”: https://lemmy.ml/post/25050001/16268910

          A snippet from my response:

          (a) Show me the Uyghur bodies

          (b) Show me the serious bodily or mental harm

          (c) Show me the conditions calculated to bring about physical destruction in whole or in part

          (d) Show me the measures intended to prevent births within the group

          In accordance with China’s affirmative action policies towards ethnic minorities, all non-Han ethnic groups were subject to different laws and were usually allowed to have two children in urban areas, and three or four in rural areas.

          (e) Show me the forcible transfer of children from one group to another group

          All you have are a couple of photos of prisons, which proves nothing, and some garbage testimonies that we’ve debunked a thousand fucking times already.

        • MDCCCLV
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Both things can be true, China has very tight control of media and they’re officially doing only stuff to terrorists. It’s literally impossible to hide carpet bombing apartment blocks anywhere in the world. Disappearing people into reeducation camps inside isn’t.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Both things can be true

            Anything can be true if you retreat into your mind palace of pure logic and reasoning

            Then you can literally just say whatever the fuck you want

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            4 months ago

            With the numbers that Adrian Zenz claims it’s impossible to hide for that long.

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            It will 200% be declassified as a CIA operation in 40 years, but by then new accusations on new enemies of he US will be the new topic no one is able to question. If the US still exists by then lol

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            No shit the CIA isn’t mentioned. Do you think CIA agents would have been there at the scenes of these terrorist attacks? That’s not how any of this works.

            • pineapple@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Your argument seams conflicting. On one hand your arguing that there isn’t enough evidence to argue that there is no genocide in china (which I agree with) but your also stating that the US has covered up all the evidence of there involvement with terrorism in china but the cia is still involved. What evidence heavily suggests or proves there involvement?

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Listen, I’m sure there’s a very good reason why we have radically different policies towards Afghani Muslims and Uyghur Muslims, despite the fact they share a border and a litany of cultural practices.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    Hot take:

    The US has committed horrifying war crimes and crimes against humanity against Muslims and continues to do so.

    And so does China

    Its always fascinating to see the war between Nazis and Tankies fight over which imperial power is based, rather than demonstrating a working frontal lobe and damning both for their crimes.

    • jankforlife@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      And so does China

      The only “evidence” of this comes from the empire and is demonstrably false

        • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The 400 citations in question:

          [1] Victims of Communism Memorial Association

          [2] Burger Eagle Freedom Institute

          [3] China Freedom NGO (Washington DC)

          [4-399] Western State Television Station (retrieved in 2020)

          [400] Literally the CIA

          The article editors in question:

          u/USA_STEM_Edgelord_USA_1990

          u/TotallyNotAFed69

          u/WhiteCisManInHis30s

          • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Good job outing yourself as someone who can only read up to 3 lines before they have to vomit bullshit onto the internet.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Someone once put together a book titled, “One Hundred Authors Against Einstein.” Einstein dismissed the book with the quip, “Why one hundred? If I were really wrong, they’d only need one.”

              • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Sounds like a colossal reach at best, and pathetic cope at worst.

                You understand the colossal differences between multiple independent journalists researching and reporting on the same topic, and a large organized group of pseudointellectuals trying to disprove a single person based on vibes alone, right?

                You seem to be very desperately, and pathetically holding onto a form of fallacy of composition:

                https://practicalpie.com/fallacy-of-composition/

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No, I’m simply calling out a lazy gish gallop. It’s the same in both cases.

                  How many sources are listed on the Wikipedia page for Christianity? If I accept your logic as valid, it seems I’ll have to convert.

          • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources of public information, most especially do to the international collaboration efforts on it.

            You can’t just dismiss a source on the basis that you don’t like it. You need to provide actual evidence that the source is untrustworthy

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources of public information

              Yeah if you’re looking up wood joints and math theorems. Not if you’re trying to learn anything about politics or history that ties into the interests of the systems and institutions that filter the media allowed as valid citations.

              You need to provide actual evidence that the source is untrustworthy

              Do they ban the New York Times because they lied the country into every war it’s been in since McKinley?

        • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not only has China been an imperialist regional super power for the majority of its lo g history, but simply ask Taiwan, the Uyghurs, Tibet, Hong Kong, Vietnam or any of the various countries China is practicing neocolonialism in in Africa or Island nations

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is fanfiction. China isn’t practicing neocolonialism in Africa, it’s engaging in south-south trade that is actually helping African countries escape the trappings of western imperialism. Taiwan was invaded by the KMT when they lost the war, and took over the island. The Xinjiang and Tibet are both doing well and support the PRC, and Hong Kong is gradually doing better now that they aren’t under British colonial rule. Vietnam is a strong trade partner with China.

  • humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    So concerned that we bribed foreign terrorists to blow shit up in Xinjiang, forcing China to spend on education and job programs there.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      These people, who don’t know shit about fuck, are absolutely sure that they already know everything that needs to be known, and that we don’t know shit about fuck.

      And in twenty years they’ll say they knew it all along.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Please elaborate: where’s the racism?

        This has been the US playbook since before we were born, and funding, arming, and influencing Salafi jihadists in particular has been going on since at least the 1980s. Previously:

        6 December 1993: Anti-Soviet warrior puts his army on the road to peace

        FAIR: Forgotten Coverage of Afghan ‘Freedom Fighters’ But the U.S. government and the American press have not always opposed Afghan extremists. During the 1980s, the Mujahiddin guerrilla groups battling Soviet occupation had key features in common with the Taliban. In many ways, the Mujahiddin groups acted as an incubator for the later rise of the Taliban in the 1990s.

        Despite CIA denials of any direct Agency support for Bin Laden’s activities, a considerable body of circumstantial evidence suggests the contrary. During the 1980s, Bin Laden’s activities in Afghanistan closely paralleled those of the CIA. Bin Laden held accounts in the Bank for Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), the bank the CIA used to finance its own covert actions. Bin Laden worked especially closely with Hekmatyar—the CIA’s favored Mujahiddin commander. In 1989, the U.S. shipped high-powered sniper rifles to a Mujahiddin faction that included bin Laden, according to a former bin Laden aide.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    lol seriously. Most obvious propaganda scam of all time. Libs fell hook line and sinker though.

  • Shamber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Translation, we are very concerned because someone else is doing the killing, they took ur, joooobsss

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Valid meme but hopefully it doesn’t minimize the plight of Uyghurs in peoples minds.