• 1 Post
  • 329 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle

  • The policy isn’t there just to be extra nice, it’s because otherwise the patient dies without a liver.

    Since she was too sick for a partial liver transplant, and not eligible for a dead donor full liver transplant, she would have just died.

    It might seem cruel but the same is done for a lot of other procedures; if the chance of you dying in surgery is way too high, doctors won’t take the risk, they’re not executioners.

    It’s not a moral judgement about her alcoholism, the same would have been true if she had a cancer no surgeon would take on.
















  • CommanderCloon@lemmy.mltoWTF@lemmy.wtfThat's great. That's great.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    They did not save any lives, that is a completely made up invention. In fact Imperial Japan cared little about the atomic bomb, and even if a land invasion had become necessary, the USA had made a deal with the USSR to invade on land.

    This was the real reason for the bombings, not to beat Japan into submission, which Roosevelt’s deal with the USSR for a land invasion ensured, but to show the USSR the destructive power the US held. Truman was a staunch anticommunist, and refused to let the USSR play the part Roosevelt negociated in a land invasion.

    It was a war crime with no benefits at all except to show off to the USSR, who would develop nukes themselves 4 years later anyway. An absolute tragedy which proved to be entirely useless.