• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    These threads are great because they are nice tankie block attractors. They can’t help themselves from commenting on their non tank-3 accounts.

    • ArxCyberwolf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s hilarious. I have them all tagged and the same usual suspects always show up like clockwork.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Man, your post has really brought out the CCP shills. It’s fascinating to watch people go, “Nuh-uh! China doesn’t do any of that!”

    • __nobodynowhere@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I learned a dozen countries are all in on a conspiracy theory in which they pretended China had operated overseas police stations in their respective countries. Fake news!

  • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I got banned there last week for saying that lemmy mods are just as pathetic and banhappy as reddit mods

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      in my experience, they’re a lot worse….
      stuff that would get a comment removed or a note from the mod to chill just gets you an instant permaban here…
      and they’ll ban you for the dumbest shit too… simply discussing china’s human rights abuses that are well documented and publicized is “racism against chinese people” or some dumb shit….
      luckily it’s just the hard hard leftists… the places that are all shills anyway (like he-x-b34r)
      (i just spelled that dumb so it’s harder to search).

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’ve noticed mods of some instances will lurk and ban users for comments that weren’t even on their instance.

        Some of the mods on blahaj do that while using fake user accounts to sow approval.

        It’s insane what patheticly small amount of power internet janitors will manage to trip on

        • tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          Don’t start with Bahaj, I remember a post some time ago where I saw lots of removed comments so out of curiosity I went through the modlog. People were being banned and comments removed for literally nothing (like, not a slur or x-phobia or anything, just a discussion about OPs topic), ban reasons for example were “you’re not the victim” lol. When I pointed it out in that thread, my comment got removed as well (but I graciously was allowed to not have my account banned). Of course you don’t want to have instagram-esque comments in Lemmy but power tripping mods still suck and the modlog is kinda useless if you cannot revoke decisions

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Officially, it’s “bigotry”, unofficially it’s a catch-all so that when someone brings it up their more prominent users can make declarations like this:

      “routinely the actual reasons people are mad at .ml is getting banned/ censored for being bigoted”

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Only in actual fact, though ashamedly never written down anywhere irl in a manner that is so clear and understandable.

  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Just block those instances. My weirdest and most disgusting experiences ever on Lemmy were on instances like that one.

  • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Lol, I got a similar removal and ban (rule 1, 2*) the other day for replying to someone who mentioned credit ratings as a counterpoint to the attempts to discredit the existence of “social credits” (or whatever actual system exists in China, and it does exist, to keep tabs on their population):

    This right here.

    And the point is that an average American barely knows how those work, or exactly what information the government and or private financial and other companies collect about them (it’s a lot) or how much it impacts their daily lives (deeply), in the same way the average Chinese person barely knows just how much surveillance their government is doing on them (it’s a lot) or how much it impacts their daily lives (deeply).

    This post is such tankie bullshit.

    Pretending like only one government does (internal and external) propaganda, or only one government is oppressing and lying to its own people (not to mention people in other countries), or that the average person in any country know, or is willing to admit to themselves, never mind others, and especially never mind people from a country you’ve been propagandised against from birth, the flaws of their own government is not only laughable, and hypocritical, but also massively counterproductive.

    *as you can see, the ban is really for calling OP “tankie bullshit” and *gasp* pointing out that China is bad in the same ways America is bad. Such fragile egos lmfao

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It might be a bit repetitive, but I think it’s important to keep the most clear examples here.

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    YDI

    Tankie is a lazy political slur so your are engaging in bad faith.

  • holo@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    17 hours ago

    YDI, stop blindly repeating a fascist government’s propaganda.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oh yea because I’m sure China’s CCP isn’t spreading propaganda or anything of their own/s

      • holo@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Sure, all governments do. China makes themselves look better. The US tries to make everyone else look worse since they know no one would believe propaganda that makes them look better.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          That’s just being pedantic, there’s no significant functional difference in most cases

          China makes themselves look better

          Denying a genocide makes them “look better”

          • holo@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            16 hours ago

            There’s no genocide to deny, even the US state dept has found no evidence of genocide

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I thought you wanted us to:

              stop blindly repeating a fascist government’s propaganda

              Yet you’re now using that same fascist governments propaganda to claim your side is right?

              • holo@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Given they’re the ones that started the rumor and are the only ones to have ever have claimed to have evidence of the rumor, without sharing it mind you, yes.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Wild to be so indoctrinated that you continue to believe the Uyghur genocide lies, even when the departments that made it up admit they made it up.

    This is why it’s so easy to mislead the American public. You want the lies.

      • Pili@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s funny how you racists never need any sources for the original claim lmao

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          yeah, criticism of the PRC is not racism… it’s the opposite, i don’t want their human rights to be violatd… but nice try, agent

      • redrum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Sorry, but who should prove that there is a ongoing genocide is who do that claim, requiring to prove the no existence of something is a fallacious argument.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is unrelated to the topic, but that’s not how logic works. The burden of proof is upon the person(s) making the positive claim. So either you say,

          • “Yes, there is genocide” (positive claim)
          • “No, there is no genocide,” (positive claim)
          • “I don’t know/don’t believe you.” (neutral claim)

          So anyone in this post saying there isn’t genocide has a burden of proof to show why they believe it’s not occurring, because they are making a positive claim. It is not a logical fallacy to prove an opposing claim, and difficulty proving it doesn’t absolve anyone of that responsibility.

          Likewise, anyone saying there is genocide occurring should provide evidence for that claim. Typically, the person making the first positive claim has the initial responsibility.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          LMAO did you even read your source‽ It’s right there in the summary

          But evidence that it is carrying out other forms of genocide abounds, Beth Van Schaack, a visiting professor at Stanford Law School’s Center for Human Rights and International Justice, wrote in a recent post on Just Security.

          “For example, the torture, rape and sexual violence committed against Uyghurs likely constitute genocide ‘by causing serious bodily and mental harm’—the second type of genocide recognized by the Convention,” she wrote. “Likewise, the deplorable living conditions of incarcerated Uyghurs may constitute genocide by ‘deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about [their] physical destruction’—the third form of genocide.”

          @[email protected] you should have read their source, it doesn’t even back them up in any way LMFAO

        • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          From your article:

          But evidence that it is carrying out other forms of genocide abounds, Beth Van Schaack, a visiting professor at Stanford Law School’s Center for Human Rights and International Justice, wrote in a recent post on Just Security.

          “For example, the torture, rape and sexual violence committed against Uyghurs likely constitute genocide ‘by causing serious bodily and mental harm’—the second type of genocide recognized by the Convention,” she wrote. “Likewise, the deplorable living conditions of incarcerated Uyghurs may constitute genocide by ‘deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about [their] physical destruction’—the third form of genocide.”

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Yes, she’s trying to stretch their claims into persisting. Again, without evidence.

            I understand reading is challenging for you, but you’re gonna have to actually read the whole article to get the context.

            What’s actually happening is China is preventing the US from further radicalization of the Uyghurs to destabilize the region, and de-radicalizing those being rehabilitated. The US doesn’t like their terror cells being stopped.

            https://x.com/SpokespersonCHN/status/1380170110736855041?mx=2

            • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Yep, for sure. More western countries should adopt the Chinese approach of “cultural assimilation” by locking up all our Muslim immigrants in “re-education” camps to unlearn Islam. They wouldn’t get any criticism for that right?

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                Wahabism isn’t native. It’s literally being imported by Saudi Arabia, and is actively trying to destroy Uighur culture.

                ‘Muslim’ is not a monoculture and it is ironic that someone worried about cultural genocide believes it is.

                • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Don’t straw man me. I was simply pointing out how insane this would be if any Western country employed the same ‘assimilation’ methods that China is doing. I mean, arguably the US is doing something similar with the way they exploit their prison populations (minus the re-education part). But that’s also shameful. Just because the US does shameful things too doesn’t mean that China’s shameful things don’t matter or shouldn’t be talked about. These types of reprehensible State actions should all be scrutinized and opposed.

                • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  I agree with you, all authoritarian States suck ass, including the US. I post more critical stuff about the US than about any other country. Still that doesn’t give China a free pass. You can shove your “critical support” where the sun don’t shine if you are just simping for a different authoritarian State.

        • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          even when the departments that made it up admit they made it up.

          i mean a source that backs up the claims you made, sea lion

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t get how suicide nets is a knock on china. They’re making our phones.

    It’s our consumer demand and our company’s price points that are responsible for the conditions in the factories that make our phones.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s their citizens / labor laws.

      Sure an American said “we want 12h shifts 6 days a week with absolutely minimal breaks” (or whatever the specifics are) (and that’s a a terrible request.)

      But the kicker is a Chinese labor official said “yup, sure thing”

    • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      So are you saying that in the glorious Chinese workers paradise they don’t set and enforce decent health and safety policies and regulate working conditions and wages for the benefit of their citizens? Paint me amazed!

      • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        the glorious Chinese workers paradise

        The scary thing is they genuinely believe this.

        I had responded to a tankie who claimed that China wasn’t an oligarchy by sarcastically asking if they thought the workers control the government, and like 5 different (or are they?) hexbears descended on me to tell me that yes, akshually, they do (and therefore must be the most self loathing workers on the planet, if those are the conditions they inflict on themselves, and curiously keep “electing” the same authoritarian, billionaire, dictator to be at the top of their classless, moneyless, stateless society). 🤦‍♀️

        E: on a side note since I’ve got you here and you’re an admin, I thought this instance was defederated from hex, and I have them on my personal blocked instance list, should I still be seeing their users?

        • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          16 hours ago

          You can still come across their users if they post in a community external to Hexbear, even if you have instance blocked them. Our instance actually isn’t defederated from Hexbear fyi. They mostly leave us in peace nowadays though, so unless you go looking for a fight on their instance, you’re unlikely to run into problems with them.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      because the Chinese public isn’t supposed to know about it… plus people might demand more ethically produced phones if they were more aware.

    • araneae@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      China decided to play ball with the slave economy because it makes scads of money. If they were interested in pushing fucking state communism and raising the quality of living perhaps this was the wrong move. I suppose the counterargument would be that letting the west export its manufacturing sector somewhere else would have been a missed opportunity, but perhaps (and I say this as an American) the better move ideologically would have been not to engage with manufactory colonialism for a quick buck. Now we have Foxcon. They might have aligned with communist or at least sympathetic governments around the world for the project of I dunno stonewalling western oligarchs and not participating in the capitalist economic system. Insane, radical, anti-Party thought I know, I’m sorry. Just thinking out loud here.