Wild swings in policy across administrations? Oh no, not something totally new and unique, the likes of which we’ve never seen before!

deleted by creator

I don’t understand your argument at all. Your first comment seems to disagree with the ban, but this one explicitly agrees with it.

Your example is weird because it doesn’t exist. There is no restrictions on how chess players train, only how they compete. All you’re doing is building a strawman, not an analogy.

And to be clear, they didn’t get banned for using AI. They got banned for lying about using AI. You can agree or disagree with the rule itself, but it’s not debatable whether it was in place when they entered the contest or whether the studio lied about it.

The last line makes it sound a lot more like social anxiety than introversion.

If Darwinism had properly and rightfully claimed

So you just don’t understand Darwinism at all? Cool.

I dont understand the purity tests we are putting artists through

I love how “don’t break the rules and lie about it when entering a contest” is a purity test, now. Y’all are fucking wild.

Or just don’t lie about something that is against the rules for the contest you’re entering? Seems easy enough.

Is there a rule that chess players can’t train with caffeine?

Of course not. It’s not at all the same.

It’s not because they used AI, it’s because they lied and fraudulently marketed (and continue to fraudulently market) the game as never having used AI.

Hahahahahaha, he thinks none of this data will be sold 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 it’s literally the only reason to spend all this money developing it

It’s opt-out, so the majority of users who don’t even know about it will keep it on. That means Mozilla gets to steal their data and use it for profit, even if they don’t interact with it directly.

Too little, too late. I already switched and won’t be returning as long as the CEO is still employed there.

Anthony Enzor-DeMeo can suck a dick and die in a fire. I hope your company fails due to your disastrous decisions.

It’s his job 🤷‍♂️ I’d maybe feel more conflicted if he didn’t absolutely fucking destroy him and break his jaw in two places

…can you point to where the guy you replied to originally said that? Because that didn’t happen, either.

I guess I just live somewhere with real farms? There are 3 weekly farmers markets near me. All of them are something like 1/2 to 2/3 of the cost, and at least triple the quality of the grocery store.

You clearly put a LOT more emphasis on a downvote than literally anyone else, if that’s your thought process. It’s one click.

…when it was developed with a front page that shows you communities you’re not subscribed to? It’s literally a core feature of the platform.

Going down my front page and down voting half of the posts because I think they’re low-effort trash is not “mass downvoting.” It’s very literally engaging with the system exactly as it was designed and intended.

30s per day of mild-to-moderate discomfort for 5 years, or working an average of 6 hours per day for virtually my entire life.

This was clearly written by someone with an intense and irrational fear of the sea. Nothing’s doing shit to you in 30 seconds. Most creatures wouldn’t even register your presence quickly enough to even think about doing anything.

It sounds like The Hand is inevitable, so you’d just be dooming everyone else in your tunnel/bunker/whatever when it collapses. If anything, I’d argue we’d spread out a bit more to avoid collateral damage.