• SPRUNT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “buy Greenland” and “invade Mexico”

    Geee, I wonder why the difference in acquisition methods. /s

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “To increase defense, security and economic cooperation,” WTF?!?! The Orange Shit Stain is threatening a trade war with the EU, which includes Denmark, and he wants to bust up NATO. Liar.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Why is Trump so fixated on Greenland? Nuuk has less than 20,000 residents and the island is only really known for its fishing industry.

    Also I’m sure Denmark are part of NATO already so there’s already no additional military importance from buying the land.

    • sprack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There is potentially an immense amount of rare earth minerals buried under one of the largest supplies of freshwater. And it’s close to the arctic which would make it convenient location for refineries with arctic oil and gas.

      • humanspiral
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Resources and climate refuge can’t be the major reason. Too long term payoffs.

        Military bases threatening Europe or the us depending on control, is only a big deal when considering policies that raise anger.

        • sprack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You’re giving too much credit if you think he thought of it. Others want him to get it for them. He’s old and unhealthy, but a useful stooge in the interim.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      People think there is gas and oil under Greenland. And because of global warming it becomes much easier to extract it. Also Trump probably wants be closer to Moscow.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s a very large secluded island that’s about to get livable and he’s a real estate guy, a bad one but still. He’s not playing chess, he’s trying to buy land to setup billionaire playlands with zero poors. Don’t really want to live in the country filled with poors you just fucked up, that would be insane.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    It can’t be true. There’s no way he said that. It has to be a fake message.

    Fuck me this guy has lost the god-damned plot and he’s not even in office yet.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do I have a feeling he saw the Mercator version of Greenland and was having size envy and wants it.

  • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can we just build a replica oval office at Mar A Lago and having him play president while someone real just takes over? Fuckkkkk

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      A lot of those until the combined effort of Europe, the US and Russia stopped him.

      I don’t know, but when the coming leader of the nation with the largest military in the world and the second most nukes is throwing wild conquest fantasies around, some about allies, I can’t help but get a little bit nervous.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The US annexing Greenland is all it would take? How so? I’m asking because I’m woefully undereducated in these matters. Couldn’t we form our own NATO, without the US but with blackjack and universal health care?

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Greenland belongs to Denmark. Denmark doesn’t want to give it up. So annexing it would constitute an attack of one NATO member on another.

          • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Exactly. Also, Europe can and likely will start its own defensive alliance sooner or later. But with the US constituting more than half the military power of NATO right now, that won’t amount to much other than keeping the Russians in check.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah, so the issue is that NATO, in order to be effective, is very much dependent on the US being in it. Bother.

              • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not really, NATO is a nuclear power and a several times bigger conventional military power than Russia, even without the US.

                That said, it would be shit fighting against the US. For everyone involved.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  It’s an interesting thought exercise - US has the base formerly known as Thule. My father was stationed there decades ago, however according to Wikipedia, it’s part of Space Command now. I can’t imagine that being much of an offensive force, nor being near anything.

                  Meanwhile Wikipedia lists a Dutch navy detachment splitting time between there and Faroes

                  Luckily it seems like both would have a difficult time asserting a military option, and any such misadventure would likely be dominated by the weather. It’s hard to believe the residents would approve

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    How much do native Greenlanders like being governed by Denmark, would they conceivably be better off as US citizens? Obviously self governance is best but could they defend their own territory in that case. I think there’s a case to be made for this idea and few Americans regret having Alaska as part of the union.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      It’s already a self governing territory. And Americans will treat the Natives probably even worse than the Danish do nowadays

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Lets see here… giving up social nets and universal healthcare, adopting policies that are destroying their home, very likely never be granted statehood, thus have little say in federal politics…

      Im going to go with a strong no. They arent better off as US citizens.

    • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Last time this idea was brought up, the Danish response was clear: Denmark can’t sell Greenland because it’s not ours to sell. The Greenlanders rejected the offer.

      There’s been decades of collaboration between Denmark and Greenland on establishing autonomy and independence of Greenland. It appears they are not interested in becoming integrated into a different state, but would rather continue that process.

      But indeed, it’s up to the people of Greenland.