“The maps shouldn’t have shown that the bridge was complete.”

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Three men die in bizarre money-laundering incident.”

    Judging by the pictures, that bridge was never going to connect to anything.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The article tells you it’s a repair of a wash out. So it absolutely does have a connection.

  • Opisek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    I fail to see how that’s Google Maps’ fault. This is the city’s fault for not blocking the bridge. Would people have complained if a paper map didn’t update all the collapsed bridges daily?

      • markstos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Looks like it might have been dark and foggy. The government failed to block the extremely dangerous situation— a standard practice when a bridge is put in other places.

    • lost_voyager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      It’s from India, here either news reporters take bribe to not write it was authorities fault or can’t think straight and rational.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    2 days ago

    what if it was a paper map? would the mapping company be liable?

    put the blame where it belongs; on the construction company who failed to block an unnavigable, dangerous piece of road.

    • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah I mean it would have been good if google maps could have prevented this but like the same thing could have happened to someone without a map

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I mean, someone has to provide the information. If one day, there’s a full bridge, and the next day it’s deconstructed for repairs, Google can’t magically know; some information needs to be pushed out to be parsed and updated. It wouldn’t surprise me if this was simply done by construction co. without proper filing etc. very few nations have the extreme regulations that U.S. has - it’s one of America’s redeeming qualities. Of course, that may not always be the case. But yknow.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          I suppose it depends on the locale, but I’m my experience, the cities I’ve lived in update the gis maps and send change updates to Google very regularly, where they sit unimplemented for months.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used to travel by paper map for like all of the 90s and 00s. I can reliably say, it was never the map’s fault.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s completely irrelevant. It’s not magic.

        Blindly following directions without awareness of the situation around you is always your fault. A failure to block the road is the fault of whoever’s responsible for the road, but never the map.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago
    1. As soon as the bridge was deemed unsafe, it should have had barricades erected.
    2. Situational awareness supersedes maps, digital or not.
    3. Every GPS device, paper map and App out there would have had even chances to miss this.
    4. Driving in India is insane, even if the infrastructure wasn’t as bad as it is… and to be clear, it’s awful.
    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Situational awareness is key, but if all other indicators suggested everything was fine and you were driving up a bridge at night, there’s not much warning before the road is suddenly not there thanks to the curvature of the road. I’ve seen plenty of short clips of cars dropping into missing road segments due to whatever reasons, and it’s just not something you look for normally while driving nor is it that easy to see from a distance vs. an obstacle on the road. It’s possible they tried to stop and just couldn’t in time. The vehicle would be farther away if they had just flown off and not right below the base.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      Infrastructure and Driving in India come with substantial risks to life.

    • IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nope. Public safety just isn’t a thing in India. At least it wasn’t twenty years ago when I went there. People die, everyone goes about their day, and nothing changes.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Given that there is death involved, this is “sensitive”… So I will not post a gif of Michael and Dwight driving into the river because the GPS told them to.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    What excuse do they have for ignoring traffic signs and literally every other indication that the road is closed?

    A GPS doesn’t absolve you from personal responsibility. Use your eyes.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They were driving in the night. Visibility was poor. The road wasn’t closed off. Just to name a few.

      You’re probably imagining reflective signs, barricades, lights, led warning signs, etc. I know i would expect all of those.

      But this is India. And we’re talking about a company that didn’t even block the road. There is a very good chance there were no indications visible in the night.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    TBH people who do this deserve whatever consequences that get. Not the passengers necessarily, but the drivers absolutely do.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    google maps once tried to send me through a military base. Like, yes this would technically be faster if it wasn’t for the armed guards.

    apple maps hasn’t tried to kill me … yet

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There were almost monthly stories about Apple Maps leading to death and near-death experiences when they came out, not sure about now. Hopefully they got better.

      • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I use it. It’s definitely gotten better. The traffic and business data isn’t as good as Google’s, but otherwise they’re pretty comparable these days.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Genuine question: If Apple Maps is inferior to Google Maps, why do you use it? I don’t want to sound judgemental, but it seems like trading giving your info from one giant corporation to another. If I ever de-Google I’ll switch to Open Street Maps…

          • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Apple already has my location data from other apps including Find My. I’d rather give it to one megacorp instead of 2 I guess.

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Totally valid. I guess anything is better than nothing, they all pretty much have our data anyway…

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve been sent the wrong way up one way streets (big flaw to not have the fucking direction of traffic marked so that’s also on the city design) and my wife was sent through a quarry once

      Fucking weird part is that the quarry route is a legit road that connects to a shopping center on the other side, so I guess that one is fine?

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Those people are fun the first and second time. After that you start getting a certain attitude towards them.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        After working retail for more than a decade… Those people deserve it. The type of person to argue with an employee about whether they carry something or not solely because Google said so, are the quintessential Karen. They deserve every bit of unhelpfulness right back at them for the misery they sow everywhere they go.