So…this is a …group that supports abuse ? Wtf?
Also, those laws. Wtf?
MAP (which you can see at the top of some of the posts) stands for minor attracted persons - aka paedophiles. And let’s be honest, if a paedophile was seeking help with their sexual feelings then they wouldn’t go around advertising themselves on Facebook. These people are clearly either active child abusers or wish they had the opportunity to abuse children
I’m all for people who experience attraction to children and realize there is no moral or ethical way to fulfill that attraction getting the help they need. I’m also all for people like the ones in these Facebook groups getting the brick to the face they need.
for extra poignancy, have the former do the latter as a part of therapy
Downvoters on this comment want to touch kids.
Edit: 8 self admitted pedos so far. I was referring to the comment above mine, but hey, if pedos hate me I take that as a win.
i wish I hadn’t gone down this rabbit hole, but according to study data, 1 in 6 people want to touch kids. https://theconversation.com/a-survey-found-1-in-6-men-admit-sexual-feelings-for-children-so-is-paedophilia-increasing-218124
What the fuck?
It’s fucked. Have you ever noticed how AI-generated women always look like children’s faces with developed womanly bodies? This all comes down to our culture’s creepy obsession with unrealistic women and that insane age of consent countdown shit. All the people who love celebrities always seem to love the ones who were child actors more. And the ones who maintain a child-like look. I’m not trying to excuse pedophiles at all, I am trying to point out that those inclinations are prodded along by the beauty industry/pop culture.
The most recent example of this I think is the girl from Stranger things. She was a child actor on a huge show, so everyone knows her mainly as a child. But now she’s hyper sexualized (at least on lemmy, which is where those posts cross my path on c/all). I just think it’s the most telling example because—and not to diminish her for her physical attributes—but she just looks…like any ol’ person. I truly think men’s attraction to her is that…she was a child and now she’s technically not
I get why you’d remove the names for posting here, but I hope you’ve forwarded the unredacted versions to the police. Even when this laws are in place, visible evidence of abusing these laws to justify sexually abusing minors will remain a crime. In fact, these statements remove the “in good faith” part from the equation, and turn it back into illegal abuse.
It’s fucked that we even have to toe this line, but action should still be taken.
At first I thought these were just idiots, happy to be allowed to be transphobic without retribution…
Then I saw the word MAP.
Post the names. Post the faces. Monsters like this do not deserve the safety of the shadows.
This makes me sick to my stomach. How can this be real? How could they possibly want to give coaches this kind of immunity? How can a Facebook page like this exist out in the open?
You should send this to the police without the names redacted, if you haven’t already. These sickos clearly intend to cause harm, and they’re admitting it out in the open.
What a sad day to have eyes and know what MAP stands for
And to currently live in Alberta and know that Albertans voted for this… chose this…
This disgusting shit is allowed on Facebook, yet I got a three day ban a bit over three years ago for calling a conservative a “little bitch.”
It probably should go without saying, but I’ll say it anyway:
Yes… I deleted my account a bit over three years ago.
Stop censoring the names, fuckknob
(Not necessarily directed at you; I’m assuming you got these screenshots from elsewhere already censored)
Sick. In a very bad way. Very sick.
People will suffer. Then the law will protect the wrongdoer. Then come the vigilantes.
Looks more like trolling than anything else.
You’d need to be seriously stupid to post this junk on social media where authorities could easily track you down.
If it’s trolling, they still are right about the legislation though.
The zero benefit vs shocking harm.
