Most people just want a good life. If we stopped seeing each other as the enemies the world could be better.

  • Jonnyprophet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Amen.

    What the people who want to control us don’t want us to realize is that you have a lot more in common with the Chinese/Russian/Ukrainian/Mexican/Indian working class… Factory worker/programmer/hard-working house wife… Then you do with your own political leaders and billionaires. People with servants who don’t ever worry about bills. (Biden, Trump, Harris, Vance, Elon, Gates, Bezos, etc)… Don’t look at the foreigners as different and the enemy… Look at the Rich and the Politicians (who want us to blame the foreigners)

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Idk one side wants to enslave, murder, and rape. The other does not.

    Let’s just be friends as they take away my rights and everyone I love rights away, we shouldn’t be enemies as they hunt down and murder someone for “existing”

    Maybe we shouldn’t be friends with the enemy and fight against the regime?

    This is one of the was Nazis came into power, by manipulating the mass thinking “oh we should all be friends” and now look what happened.

    -a trans non-binary disabled person

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There aren’t only two sides to every issue. Thinking like that is limiting.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Regardless of how many sides there are, it is an undeniable fact that plenty of people (in the USA in particular, apparently, a majority of the voters) choose to be in (a) side(s) that want(s) to enslave, murder, and rape.

        And many others choose to be in (a) side(s) that enable(s) the previous one(s).

        No civilised society should accept any of those sides, or those that choose them.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          It seems that way because of the two party system brought upon by how votes are counted and winners chosen (winner takes all). If you watch jubilee, you’ll see just how fragmented both parties are (good example of pro and anti trump republicans). Forcing people to choose between one or the other has led to the USA becoming very black and white.

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Idk one side wants to enslave, murder, and rape. The other does not.

      Seeing people hold this kind of views is fucking depressing.

    • yetiftw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      solidarity means solidarity. other working class people are not your enemy (re: 1984). the all or nothing mindset accomplishes nothing besides closing your mind off to the plights and perspectives of others.

      -also trans and disabled

    • someacnt_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      As an autistic person, wholly agreed. It is like people are actively trying to isolate and dehumanize us autistic folks.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Idk one side wants to enslave, murder, and rape. The other does not.

      Advocating for OP, that’s the learnt way they see how they can become comfortable.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    It’s by design. Divide and conquer Combine and conquer has been the playbook since they (anti-labor think tanks like the Progressive Policy Institute and others that seek to keep labor infighting) started studying group psychology.

    FPTP contributes more than its share to the tribalism and poor infighting we see in the US and the UK.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yea you mentioned divide and conquer then put images of the parliament with and without FPTP. Its easily misinterpreted to say that proportional representation is somehow “divide and conquer”.

          • demesisx@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            That’s interesting and you make a great point.

            From my perspective, I showed how a simple change to US and UK election laws can topple the two party system overnight.

            Literally, if there are only two private parties run by private organizations of rich people, they merely have to divide us and conquer us. We are being puppeteered by a bunch of corporations that use identity politics to keep the poor fighting amongst themselves and people SLURP THAT SHIT UP BECAUSE THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM CODIFIES IT INTO EVERY DECISION.

            Feudalism with a few more steps.

            Interesting point, though and I can see what you mean.

            Truly, if my comment were to make sense, I’d have to say they have “combined” and conquered.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The major difference is money. We should be banding together against the rich, but instead we distract ourselves with what we look like, what we sound like, where we come from, what team (sports, town, city, state, country, …) we support, which sex we have, and a bunch of other things that divide us.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I only see people as an enemy if they’ve declared themselves as such. I’m not gonna make the first move, life is too short to make enemies with everyone I meet. That said, if you’ve got a swastika tattooed on your forehead then I’m gonna take that as a declaration that you’re my enemy.

  • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I don’t see MAGA people as the enemy because they want to pay less in taxes. I see them as the enemy because they don’t think my kids should exist in society and are actively passing legislation to make it so.

    Delete this shit take.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us shall we not revenge?

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have been struggling with this lately. I am staunchly anti violence and anti war, and yet, I am conflicted on how far I truly would be willing to go to cull classism, fascism, racism, transphobia , homophobia, misogyny, and pedophilia from the world.

    These things are abhorrent to me, and I wonder how much of my humanity I’d be willing to sacrifice in exchange for even one of these to no longer being in existence amongst the ranks of humanity.

    How much good does pacifism give to the world in promoting the better angels of our nature? How much harm does it do when those same principles allow the worst among us to march down our roads and drag away our loved ones in the night?

    Two scenes from media I consume have lately continually resurfaced in my mind. One is this scene from Vinland Saga, where the main character’s father confronts him when he finds his sword. The father is about to go off to war, and somberly asks his son who he wants to kill with his father’s sword. This culminates with the father, who again, is about to go off to war, emphatically declaring to his son that he has no enemies, that there is no such thing as enemies.

    The other is this scene from Star Wars Andor, in which a high level spy of a burgeoning Rebellion is asked by a compatriot (who wishes to quit fighting the Empire due to possibly being found out), asks what he sacrifices for the fight against the Empire. The monologue he delivers is chilling, acknowledging he sacrifices all things that make him human, he becomes like his enemy in order to defeat them. When he reflects on the question, and asks, “So what do I sacrifice? Everything!”

    That…is what I believe I will have to give up in order for there to be a sunrise for the people I love tomorrow. I’ll have to give up my humanity, everything. And I am afraid. I am selfish. I don’t want to. But I don’t know any other way.

    The feelings that scene stir up in me resonate because that is how I feel when I think on the fascist cancer that has once again metastasized in America. Having no enemies… if only. Truly. Having enemies robs me of my humanity, because in fighting them I must bury my humanity. And I know that once I do that, there’s no going back. There will be no redemption.

    The thing I am struggling with is… am I the one who makes them my enemies? Or are they? And if the only thing we can agree on is that we are enemies…then what choice do we have when they come for me and those I claim as my kin?

    • itsAsin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      i just wanted to say that what you wrote here is beautiful and it helps me clarify my thoughts. ♥️

    • dubyakay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      cull classism, fascism, racism, transphobia , homophobia, misogyny, and pedophilia from the world

      One of these is not like the others.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fair enough. To be clear, I am saying I would not like any of these aspects of humankind, not that they are necessarily in any way equivalent. Nor am I trying to necessarily relate them to each other. On their own, I dislike them.

    • I can see uve put a lot of thought into this.

      The beauty of being human is that u have free will. U can choose to believe what u want u can choose to do as u wish.

      If u claim that someone is ur enemy then they most certainly 100% are ur enemy. If u do not claim this and they claim that u are their enemy then they are not nessasarilly ur enemy. Its a common trope that you create ur own worste enemies iron man trilogy is a great example of this.

      If u where no to be “selfish” (to maximise the life of everyone over urself) then u would donate everythibg u had to make the lives of others better untill ur life is equal to that of the lowest person alive whos life u seek to improve. U would give up ur possessions ur food ur drink the organs u can spare u might even commit self immolation. U clearly are not doibg this so therefore u must admit u are on some level “selfish”.

      U could then say this is a ridiculous thing and that u should live to maximise ur own life over everyone else. U could poison the earth destroy the forests dig oil out of the ground to power ur weapons factory that u sell to both sides of a conflict where each side aims to genocide eachother while u push propaganda to extend this state of affairs. You could disrespect the rights of everyone for ur own enjoyment.

      It is ur free will to decide where on this spectrum u wish to be. And wherever u may end up its still selfish to some degree.

      Say u can create 1 unit of evil to extinguish 1million units of evil will u do this? What about 1 for 100? 1 for 2? 1 for 1.000001? 1 for 1? In all these cases u arw doing evil and at worse u arent making the world a worse place?

      Imo:

      I would be willing to do almost anything to achieve my goals

      Pacifism simply allows the proactive to take advantage of the weak

      1.8million people died of a preventable disease last year and ur worried about ur humanity because u will have enemies and thats gonna undermine ur humanity? Are u willing to ignore 1.8million deaths per year to fight another fight that is multiple orders of magnitude less harmfull? Is this not a selfish act?

      People go to war and kill other humans. They berry their humanity to do so does this make them unredeemable? Why would u be any different? U can choose to forgive urself whenever u wish u cannot do somthing u truly believe to be wrong (u can have regrets fron learning new info or be forced to do somthing but then thats not on u) cos then u wpuldnt do it.

      I think ur scared that trump is a facist and that hes coming to murder u and ur kin. Relax ur fine u are being used. Ur a usefull idiot for the purposes of promoting a political agenda.

      If they do come for you then utilise ur second amendment to do everything that u possibly can and take as many as u can with u.

  • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Like South Park on religion: “you’re all so focused on the stupid little differences that you’re not seeing the big, stupid similarities.”

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    nah.

    I can’t have empathy for fuckheads that want to kill and imprison people based on their sexual preferences or their identity.

    I refuse to subject myself to the torture of “working together” with people with fascist ideologies.

    I cannot, and will not, coexist with Nazis.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think op meant more along the lines of normal, everyday people, not radical extremists who hate everyone that isn’t like them.

      and by normal, I mean non hate driven people. I believe everyone is weird in some way, there is no “normal”.

      the way I described it to my son is everyone has the same right to be happy as he does, you don’t get to dictate that to anyone. we love you for your weirdness and expect the same for anyone else.

      • 01011@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        White supremacists are not radical extremists in the West, they are the norm. They might be more nuanced than those who display overt bigotry but not by as much as they like to tell themselves.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        In many countries most normal people will harass, imprison or kill people based on sexual preference or gender identity.

        Just normal people. Not members of any extremist group. Just the guy who is selling groceries or the gal buying them. Most people on this world hate anyone who is different to them.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Some are fascists. Some are not. That’s a pretty big distinction.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is something we all need to remember

    Have empathy and realize that people can have there own views. They aren’t dumb because they disagree with you

  • Zacpod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not sure that’s true. One side has empathy. The other does not. I don’t want to be friends with someone who doesn’t have empathy.

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The world is not binary like that. Your side is not all good and the other side is not all bad.

    • WeUnite@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I kind of see your point there. My hope though is that maybe people could gain more empathy for each other by understanding that we are all human and I hope that one day people can understand each other’s struggles.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They see the world as a zero sum game. They can’t imagine being happy unless someone else is unhappy.