This was informative, and unexpectedly candid. I guess I understand downvotes as an expression of disapproval of the act of making fake IDs but if it was legal at the time to make them, then only the ethical argument remains and that’s moot if it’s illegal now.

I feel smartened

We might make new friends on the road that day.

Bald for Bieber

My local branch of the ICE Enforcement and Removal division is not answering calls. It rings and rings without end.

Thank you for the link. It’s as if that article was spying on my wife, and I’ll share it with her when she wakes. Happy Tuesday!

Medical seriousness aside, I love that he’s in good spirits about it.

In one video, he panned the camera from the left side of his face to the right, joking: “We normal over here, we get crazy over here!”

David Steven Cohen, the head writer, died recently on 15-Mar-2025.

Stop twiddling your thumb

Would @[email protected] please share your thoughts on the response from @[email protected]?

Of course if these ideas were ever put into practice, they’d require the establishment of definitions, scope, parameters, exceptions, consequences, etc.

I think a lot of us understand the spirit of the OP, and you’re showing us you aren’t on the same page or even opened the book.

Sure, if the offered idea was to abolish every philosophically tangential advertisment, then you’ll be the advertisor of reason when we advertise bans on flowers’ colors because they advertise to pollinators, or bans on babies’ cries because they’re advertising their want of nourishment.

They’re not wrong. It’s feeling like Jaden Smith posting.

They must’ve swallowed

I transport patients to their appointments and often wait in the car for a few hours. The protesters seem to leave early whenever they hear Hasa Diga Eebowai and the Captain Underpants theme song more than once.

Shithead

I read it that way too

First, I’ll abolish your milk
Then, I shall abolish your VIRGINITY

I had a dream I worked for a soulless mining corporation. Oh wait…

Hi all! Referencing rule 2 “the entire showerthought should be in the title” I think this one warrants removal but I hate to wipe out good faith interaction in the comments, so I’m locking instead. Please consider resubmitting with a more concise/compliant title, or not. Peace.

And until they behave like nazis, you’d defer to the friendly warning, correct?

Big picture, this is positive news.

That said, I doubt the Admissions and Bursar’s offices are isolated from each other.

I see no reason to believe there aren’t donors making their feelings known that there is a limit to how far the university can go with this. I’m thinking of the Jurassic Park lawyer smugly saying “We could have a coupon day.”