This happened in Toronto on October 24th

  • raoul@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I will be a dick: this is one of those imbeciles teck-bro takes, always comming with excuses for big tech "but actualy… "

    If you design a door handle and people cannot open it: your design is shit. Point.

    This was stupid when apple did it with the ‘you’re holding the phone wrong, idiot’, it is criminal when it is done on a security feature.

    • BCsven
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is because people don’t get a full walk through of how to unlatch it later on…they might on delivery day but at that point people are excited about a new car and not paying attention. And then because they never use it, they forget it exists

      • vxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Just watch a video of how fast car fires spread into the cabin, and then ask yourself how often you asked someone how to leave a car in case of emergency before you entered.

        Add panic and the fact that you have to remove a panel or look under the floor mat to pull a string away from you, and you maybe will understand how this is just bad design.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          if you make something with a door and the door needs a manual, your design is shit.

        • BCsven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Oh I know it is not good. Even my Honda Fit has a messed up lock system, its almost like a sideways roller switch without a truly discernable lock/unlock position so in tu dark you can’t tell if it is rolled forward or not. Messes us up when we are in the passenger seat and son:t have the powelock handy

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Emergency exit mechanisms should be designed in such a way that one CAN forget about it or never even know about it, then have it obvious, readily available, and usable, all for/by the dumbest motherfucker in existence, in an emergency situation.

        The most common analogous situation is emergency exit door signage. Most companies do an annual fire drill, which isn’t enough to really learn anything. Emergency exit signs are easy to interpret and anyone can understand what they mean and use them to get to safety, regardless of prior experience.

        Vehicle doors should be the same. Tesla front doors tend to be easy and obvious to open in an emergency (I own one and front seat passengers frequently use the emergency latch instead of the door button), but the rear doors (for the people seated closest to the damn battery nonetheless) have ridiculously difficult emergency opening procedures.

        • BCsven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree. Some people aren’t level headed in a panic scenario. They need glow in the dark arrows like the markings on jet planes pointing to the canopy release

      • VieuxQueb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        So it’s not an intuitive design. A major error by itself. Since in a panic a passenger who does not know the secret is stranded inside.

        My sister has a tesla, I have ridden in it, and I have no clue how to open the door without power.

        • BCsven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I get it, my friend has ModelS. He showed me the mechanical release, when I asked about loss of power. It is not intuitive.