• Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It should be given back to the natives, with reparations. I wouldn’t be surprised if they wanted to remove the faces and attempt to restore it.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        72
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Hey, guess what - wanting a historical wrong to be corrected by having a polity live up to its treaty obligations, however belatedly, by ceding a piece of land on which a rather ugly monument exists on and telling the original owners ‘do what you want with it’ is not the equivalent of volunteering for ethnic cleansing.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Might be a cool opportunity to build cohesion even. What if we (in consult with the Lakota whose land it annually is) build in a few cool people from other tribes too (e.g. chief Seattle, and others from all over the country). That could make it feel more like a monument to all of us.

          Generally not a fan of defacing nature though. There’s a joke in there somewhere but it’s too early.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If that’s what it takes to make reparations happen I’ll gladly give mine. Thankfully that isn’t what reparations would require so you just look like a racist asshole.