My friend and I are thinking about making an instance dedicated to debate and forking lemmy to add some debating features.

What features would you like and what do you think about the idea?

  • nutomic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    The more instances the better! But I strongly suggest that you contribute these changes directly to Lemmy, so that everyone benefits and you dont have extra work backporting our changes. Best open issues (or check existing ones) for the concrete features you want so we can discuss them.

    • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, I fully intend on back porting any features you’re willing to merge. And making everything as backwards compatible as possible. Ideally we would use mainline Lemmy, but I figured we would initially fork to do some experimental things and see how the community reacts =]

  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I’m curious, what do you think a debate oriented Lemmy fork would have over “standard” Lemmy? The nested comment system is already really good (IMO one of the best) for keeping track of long, multi-factorial discussions.

    • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      That’s basically what I’m asking. I think the nested comment system but fantastic, but I figured it could be improved upon. I made a top level comment about a classification system, where there would be “classes” of responses.

  • TheAgeOfSuperboredom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 years ago

    It would be fun if participation required you to be randomly assigned to a particular side of a debate, like a debate team. You’d be forced to confront your own beliefs at times, but would also give a chance to practice your debate skills! I can see that sort of thing only being popular with people who enjoy the art of debate though. But it could be fun for a few sublemmys.

  • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    I like the idea of “classes” of comments, so they can be more easily filtered. what do you guys think about that?

    • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      When we implement flairs, which are tags that can be configured by the moderators of each community to separate different types of content (flairs are what Reddit calls them, I don’t know what the best generic term is), we certainly could have comment flairs in addition to post and user flairs. But for now flairs in general is still on the backlog. You could also make an issue on GitHub if you want comment flairs.

      • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yeah, comment flares will be pretty useful. We may try and contribute that.

        • Adda@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          I find myself getting pretty excited about the idea of comment flairs. I do not have any extensive knowledge or experience with them, but I think it will be interesting to see what uses people come up with. It definitely sounds as an intriguing concept that I would like to experiment with.

  • 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    if youre gonna make a thing for debating you to have a modderator role, and time limits for typing, and no chatacter limit. this is what came of the top of my head.

    • Slatlun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      I would character limit rather than time limit. The idea being fair space for response. If someone’s typing speed is 2 times faster than the other, the faster typer effectively would have twice the voice if you time limit.

      • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Yeah, I was thinking a char limit so people had to make multiple posts for different parts of an argument, but IDK if that’s a good idea. I think some comment classes should allow for large responses though to convey complex ideas

        • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Lemmy already has a character limit for posts and comments, but it’s not configurable per community and is mainly meant to prevent someone from uploading a giant wall of text that could break the UI or even crash the backend. People have actually talked about increasing the default limit so longer posts and comments can be allowed.

      • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Depends on who you talk to. I think it counts as a forum, but not everyone agrees as it doesn’t fit the “classic” forum style of having only a comment depth of one and replying by quoting. At the same time, Lemmy doesn’t allow for nested communities (aka subforums) for complex, hierarchical organization of topics.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 years ago

          We also have a sort called “New comments”, that essentially turns lemmy into a forum without the sub-categories, allowing old posts to be bumped to the top and never die ( as opposed to constantly bringing new content which is the default ).

        • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          The federation handles the subforums, but it’s only depth 1. That’s basically what I’m planning for this instance; there will be communities for science, tech, politics, etc but they all focus on debating.

      • dinomug@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        Behind scenes Lemmy is something like a social network instead of a typical ‘static’ forum site.

  • dinomug@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 years ago

    It sounds interesting 🤔 but I have no idea what exactly you have in mind when you refer to an instance completely focused on debates 😐.

    • Thann@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      Mostly like the communities focus on debating, and try to stay productive, and call out fallacies and shitposts are filtered out, etc. Titles that call out debate topics, and practices and tools to help structure the debate. So that at the end of the day it’s more like a stack overflow for debating where the arguments, counterarguments, and evidence are all nicely arranged.

  • Halce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    The number of votes a comment gets could push it higher (or lower) in the hierarchy of replies to a post.