Investigators concluded Beijing’s influence attempt didn’t break elections law

  • BlameThePeacock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Having foreign countries or foreign people pressure Canadian citizens in any way to vote a particular way.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Uncover accounts doing it and trace their funding…

        This ain’t rocket science. I am sure Canada has these laws just like any other regime around the world.

        Foreign agents don’t get a blank check to operate within a country.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            True but based on recent history in US, the effective ops we need to worry about theu use “domestic” useful idiots and domsetics companies to funnel the money. Even usefull idiots know not to take foreign money.

            Think Tim pool and Lauren southern types.

            But yeah random tankie posting from NK office is not reachable but their clout is also limited.

      • BlameThePeacock
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        We regulate social media content all the time. Why would this be any different?

        • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          So…if I were to say online that Donald Trump is an absolute disgrace, and people in the US should vote for his opponent, should I be facing charges in the US? Or maybe my comment should just be nuked?

          By no means am I arguing that foreign influence is a good thing, but it’s awfully hard to regulate effectively.

          • BlameThePeacock
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            In this case, the context was that there was a threat being made, that voters could be materially harmed by the Chinese government if they did not vote a particular way. This is something that China has a history of actually following through on, so it’s obvious that people took it seriously. I don’t really have a problem with someone voicing their own individual opinion.

            To keep things simple though, probably all social media comments made by someone who is not in Canada related to Canadian politics should not be visible while in Canada. Canadians should be allowed to talk to each other freely. If Canadians want to see how Americans are feeling about our election, they should have to seek that information out from News Outlets, Pollsters, or even just directly talking to someone rather than it just showing up in some random feed on Facebook.

            • Value Subtracted@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              This article does not say threats were made - it says, “according to Chinese Canadian interview subjects, this invoked a widespread fear amongst electors, described as a fear of retributive measures from Chinese authorities should a CPC government be elected.”

              That’s bad, to be sure, but if there was no direct threat, you’re going to have a pretty hard time prosecuting the issue.

        • kent_eh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          We regulate social media content all the time

          Maybe, but how effective is that in the real world?

        • thanks_shakey_snake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Probably because it seems to mostly be targeted at Chinese-Canadians on Chinese language platforms that are often hosted in China. Like good luck regulating what happens on Weixin/WeChat.

          For stuff like radio and print based in Greater Vancouver, yeah maybe there are some levers to pull, if we could ever decide what exactly is not allowed.