Mastodon

Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?

  • 1.77K Posts
  • 2.02K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle



















  • Value Subtracted@startrek.websitetoCanadaMark Carney's climate plan is out
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    More of a set of bullet points than an actual “plan.”

    Financial incentives, not penalties, to help consumers afford things like more energy efficient appliances, electric cars, and better home insulation.

    Great - details, please. What kind of incentives, and at what stage of the buying process will they be applied?

    Canada’s biggest emitters will contribute their fair share

    Does this mean the existing carbon tax on industry will remain in place, or…something else?

    Investments towards energy efficient buildings, electrified transportation, and more.

    Meaninglessly vague without details.

    Ensuring fairness for Canadian industries on the global stage, and better integrate with allies in the fight against climate change.

    Word salad.





  • Deadline is an industry news site, so the comments tend to be filled by people from the industry (or at least claiming to be).

    It’s real hard to interpret all the corporate jargon, but…I think in the near term, nothing’s likely to change. The guy was already overseeing drama, including Star Trek, and is continuing in that role. The new bit seems to be “emphasis on franchise building and leveraging and identifying new and existing IP across broadcast, streaming and other emerging media,” which is…vague, but obviously could have implications for Trek. Maybe they’ll lean into alternative projects like the Khan podcast series, or that Picard audiobook they did a while back.

    And maybe it could involve coordinating with the film division for the next theatrical movie?


  • To elaborate on this a bit, filtering by “All” will provide content from all federated Lemmy servers, not just ours.

    If you want to only see content from startrek.website communities, you can filter by “Local.”

    If you browse or search Lemmy for communities you like, you can also subscribe to them, and then filter your feed by “Subscribed.”






  • Controls’ file says that Georgiou was brought to the prime universe in 2257, ”but after a few years we lost contact.” The events of season two of DIS take place almost immediately after season one, unless there were ”a few years” between the resolution of the Klingon war, and the USS Discovery setting out from Earth to pick up her new captain on Vulcan in “Will You Take My Hand?”.

    I wonder if our boi Ash Tyler had something to do with that when he covered up what happened to Discovery (and, I guess, to Leland). Maybe he decided to remove Georgiou from that whole situation and falsify a record saying she disappeared some time later.

    I also wonder if Ashy T. is still involved with S31 at this point - the man’s a Klingon, so he’s got the life span for it.







  • This is pretty thoughtful, and I get where you’re coming from.

    I do, however, think that the newer shows are frequently aspirational…but the focus has shifted toward doing the right thing in an environment that makes it difficult. There’s a lot more emphasis on struggle, in a way that hasn’t really been explored outside of DS9, and perhaps certain parts of ENT. That works for me, as I think it’s the more salient message for the times we live in: there are always going to be struggles, the greatest dangers often come from within, and doing the right thing can be incredibly hard.

    we rarely ever get any breathing room downtime with the characters!

    I definitely get this - it’s unfortunately something we’re going to have to learn to live with, because I don’t see longer seasons coming back any time soon (and honestly, they come with their own sets of drawbacks).



  • She did note that there are legitimate concerns about some parliamentarians potentially having problematic relationships with foreign officials, exercising poor judgment, behaving naively and perhaps displaying questionable ethics.

    “But I did not see evidence of parliamentarians conspiring with foreign states against Canada,” the report concludes.

    “While some conduct may be concerning, I did not see evidence of ‘traitors’ in Parliament.”

    This is encouraging, but there needs to be a mechanism for these “problematic relationships” to be brought out into the public sphere (without it becoming a witch hunt).