• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends. I find a lot of Japan will burn plastic that isn’t economically viable to be recycled, with a lot of effort spent on scrubbing the smoke of harmful chemicals. That seems to be better than other alternatives.

    • Nik282000
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      plastic that isn’t economically viable to be recycled

      Almost no plastic is economically viable to recycle. Even when it can be done you can usually only put a few % into the new product before it fails to meet spec.

      Surprisingly ‘make less plastic’ is the answer to ‘we have too much plastic.’

      Edit: Check out Climate Town’s Awesome Video on plastic!

      • BCsven
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a total energy savings compared to making new plastic, but it is only like 10-20% less energy. But that is a better solution than jusy dumping into a landfill. And yeah a plastic plant recycling material for new plastic bottles is like 16-20% recycled and the rest new material, so you need to make 4 bottles at least to consume an old one, so it is an expanding pyramid of bottles required.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surprisingly ‘make less plastic’ is the answer to ‘we have too much plastic.’

        but what about the plastic makers? /s

      • LostWon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Indeed. I remember where I lived in Japan it was specifically PET plastic only (and I’m pretty sure it wasn’t even all forms of PET). That generally amounted to just plastic bottles for various beverages, only. Meanwhile lots of other types of plastic were in existence as well.