"The proposed development committee voted to approve includes the restoration and stabilization of the building and the construction of a three-storey addition at the back, with 14 residential units. There are no parking spaces proposed for the site.
The plan is subject to several conditions, including the implementation of a conservation plan. It also requires that a construction schedule be submitted that outlines anticipated timing of key milestones for the project."
You must log in or register to comment.
I had my first legal drink at the dukes in this building just before it got torn down. For the record I’m pushing 40 now and they still haven’t done anything with it.
I can’t believe it taken this long to get this far!
Almost two fucking decades. In 2007 there was traffic disruption on Bank/Somerset for months.
Great that the city is getting to it now.
The heritage committee in this town is out of control. This building has been in this state for two decades because of their nonsense. Old buildings are super inefficient and the city should not stand in the way of replacing them with modern energy efficient ones. I can get behind the odd building here or there that has an exceptional heritage, but that designation should also come with funding to cover the cost of renovating to improve the energy efficiency.
Just up the road at Bank and Gladstone, heritage forced them to keep the brick facade of the old metropolitan bible church, it looks really stupid attached to a modern apartment building.
Agreed. The threshold for what is considered worthy of maintaining needs to be increased for sure. Especially given the housing crisis we’re in! People living on the streets is more important than some old façade that some find appealing.
There’s a saying that if you learn that your building is about to be designated for protection, you’d better demolish it immediately. The committees are trying to do the right thing, but most often the result is just decay and reversed incentives.
