• ttmrichter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s right.

    Density isn’t the enemy. Bad arrangement of dense population is.

    I live in a very densely-populated city (1200/km² or 3200/sq.mi.) but it’s arranged semi-sanely. Within comfortable walking distance of my home are two parks, a Daoist temple, several schools at levels ranging from primary to 2nd-tier university, two (large!) farmer’s markets, three shopping centres (two of which have sizable supermarkets), uncountable numbers of restaurants ranging from holes in the wall to fancy banquet halls… You get the idea. Within 3 stops of the nearest subway station or 5 stops of the nearest bus stop all that expands dramatically. I’m not sure I could even realistically count them all except to say that it doubles the number of Daoist temples and adds a sizable Buddhist one. (The nearest church is about 5 subway stops away, maybe 6.) Outside of work (which is an hour’s commute by subway and bus away) I could live my entire life without being more than 20 minutes away from my home … and never be bored or finding myself in a rut.

    I can’t say the same for Ottawa when I lived there. Hell, within fifteen minutes of DRIVING I couldn’t find much in most of the places I lived.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Flipped the units? I’ve never seen density measures as km²/person! Where are you seeing density measured as area per person?

      • floofloof
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But the appeal of being a farmer is too great for the average person. They want to have to get into a vehicle every time they go to do something.

        We’re getting to the point where that’s neither here nor there because however much they want that, people can’t afford it.

    • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ottawa is a big mixed bag, and covers a huge area. I lived there some decades ago, so it might be different now:

      Regions north of the 417 are generally pretty walkable; and the transit way (looks like it was replaced with the OTrain) was quite effective at moving me, so long as it was along that spine. The transitway was so good that a bus from Bayview to the south (Greenboro/south keys?) was faster than the train.

      When I lived in Kanata, there was sweet jack shit to walk, or even bike, to and the transit was pretty horrendous. The one plus, was that the express busses were pretty spot on for getting me to work, but probably only because I happened to be working on the transit way at the time (Ottawa U area).

      In the times I’ve visited since, Ottawa seems to be doing the right things in individual neighborhoods, but is struggling a bit with making each of these good things connect to each other.

      • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I lived in Orleans, Kanata, and Nepean. Nepean was almost worth it. (Almost because although there was a massive shopping centre a road-crossing away from me, it was a road you couldn’t conveniently cross and it took 20 minutes+ to get to it if you didn’t want to take your life in your own hands.) Orleans and Kanata were suburban wastelands.

        The Transitway was great if you lived in the suburbs and worked downtown. Feeder route to Transitway to downtown in the morning. Transitway to feeder route to home in the evening. If you had any other movement pattern OC Transpo was a nightmare of missed connections and half-hour buses that came once every hour. Basically if you weren’t a civil servant working downtown or someone servicing the same, a car was obligatory if you were in Orleans or Kanata. (May God have mercy on your mortal soul if you needed to take THREE buses!)

        When my friends (who live in Bells Corners) visited me here they were amazed at buses that came every five minutes except very late in the day (where that became ever 15), even on the weird distant routes. They were amazed at a subway system that got you 80% of the way there most of the time. And they were amazed at how little they had to use it when they weren’t visiting specific places (like a museum or other such touristy tat).

          • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, two decades ago is when I lived there, so…

            But I did go back for a visit in 2016 and … the buses were more comfortable at least? But the process of taking them was still frustrating AAF.

        • corsicanguppy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Kanata, Nepean, Bayshore.

          We tried a bus commute. But Nepean to Hazeldean was just not happening.

          Now they’ve got the train built by the guy who was fired from the vancouver job because his warm-weather trains couldn’t even hack a vancouver winter, we’re not surprised about the issues. He’s doing waterloo next, so, yeah.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just as a side note, public transit here goes to other cities. Not every five minutes, obviously, and at a slightly higher price. (Normal bus rides are 1-2RMB depending on the type of bus, where the buses that go intercity are 4-5RMB.) But you can actually catch a city bus at a city bus stop in Wuhan and take a bus trip to Ezhou/Huanggang about 80km away. Those buses go every 30m or so in the day and every 60m in the evenings.