• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I like it.

    It’s the “Use your kid’s slang to make them realize it’s garbage” reverse card.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Bizarre AI-generated images are currently flooding Facebook, as engagement hacks and bots run rampant on the social media platform, spawning a meme-worthy image that has been dubbed “Shrimp Jesus.”

    • Spezi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s actually working, many people around me that were enthusiastic about AI are now pissed off by it thanks to all that shit.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I feel like it usually minionizes anything it touches anyways, so that’s a surprisingly good fit for it.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Too bad the supreme court put the dagger in artists backs for AI already. It would have been great if a company would license an artists source material to make a set of variations for a limited venue. Like a company licensing a voice actor’s samples, then they get to use AI to make those characters say whatever they want, in that one movie, or that one game, based on the license.

    As it is now, we’re going to end up with Spruce Lee fighting Hackie Chan movies, and none of the actors or their estates will get to say shit about it.

    • XM34@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You don’t really know how AI works, do you? A single voice actor couldn’t produce enough lines to fully train an AI model even if they spent every second of their life in the recording booth.

      So tell me then, which of the billions of input recordings do you pay licensing fees for and how much? I mean sure, we could make a law that forces AI companies to pay for every single piece of training data. Which would probably kill AI training for the entire region where this law applies, severely crippling our already weakened economy. But I guess, at least we’re keeping the moral high grou.d while doing so.

      But seriously, the EU is cooking up a pretty amazing Ai law right now. Thought out by people far brighter than you and me and it seems to be pretty amazing at balancing economic interests with ethical obligation. My hopes are high for that one!

    • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The youngest boomers are 64 still. We may be done working with them in 10 years or so but they’re stubborn. The ones still working then are the ones who never could win financially or are the ones who took advantage of everyone and never learned to stop.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        By then Gen X will have replaced them, and going on about reminiscing about how mix CDs burned from MP3s downloaded from AOL sounded better than the vinyl and TikToks the kids are listening to will be the “we drank from the hose was our curfew” of the time

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Meh, unlikely. Gen X doesn’t have the sheer numbers to drive and sustain culture. The Boomers number something like 74,000,000 and Millennials are around 83,500,000. Meanwhile Gen X only has about 49,000,000 so we’re sandwiched between two Generations that are nearly double our size.