• IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Honestly I’d feel safer if we reduce the power of the federal government and put the power to the states. Sorry left-leaning people in red states, can’t let states like yours drag the country down with you.

    • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      As someone in a swing state, I’d be ok with that. Make the US like the EU.

      For one thing, every 4 years residents of swing states get relentlessly harassed and it fucking sucks. But also It’s so so much easier to make changes on a smaller local level without the influence of distant populations. Sure it would suck in some ways and for some states, but maybe if each state only had to convince a few thousand people to do better, rather than literally millions (presidential election, very demoralizing), swing states would be more left leaning.

      And if not, well it would probably be a lot easier to move states than move countries, even if they were EU style countries.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No concrete plans yet but we’ll see what they can do. Good to see that some people haven’t given up all hope.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A constitutional crisis is very likely over the next 4 years. And if it does, all bets are off.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The crisis already happened when the SC declared the President a dictator and Biden didn’t have them executed for it with the powers they just gave him.

          • IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Technically they said Presidents and Former Presidents cannot be prosecuted for it, not give them the authority to. You still have to find a “yes-man” to obey those orders. Biden can try, tell the military to kill SCOTUS members for treason, they say “Sorry Mr. President No-can-do”. Biden might be immune for trying to do it.

            *keyword “might” be, but Scotus can say “that was not an official act”

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              *keyword “might” be, but Scotus can say “that was not an official act”

              In this thought experiment, they would certainly not be able to say that because they wouldn’t exist anymore.

              Any new justices would certainly certainly hold the Biden-preferred opinion, because otherwise he wouldn’t nominate them. (That opinion would neither be “Biden is immune and this is fine” nor “that was not an official act,” but rather “we’re overturning the previous decision and making the President prosecutable for illegal official acts again,” because forcing that ruling would be the entire point of the exercise, BTW.)

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Do not give up hope. Don’t stop trying to make the world a better place. As long as we have people that take action, we still have hope.

    • Sunshine OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      True, at least the magas don’t have full control of every state government.