• Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s also a bit strange to see a production-intent build of a solar electric vehicle without any solar panels. Still, Aptera shared that technology will be implemented next alongside the SEV’s production-intent thermal management system and exterior surfaces.

    This thing is pure vaporware. My new Leaf isn’t.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Im not saying it isn’t, but fitting custom curved prob special solar panels on a test vehicle does not sound cost efficient, especially when you can test the solar panels separately perfectly fine.

      Cars are complex to construct properly even without drivetrains, plenty to test there.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Trains are easy and they’re easily electrified already. So putting solar on the trains won’t have any advantage.

      Rails are the difficult part of railways. They never seem to put them between my house and my work. They’ve put something called a road in between instead.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I presume they meant to put in railway infrastructure.

        Railways cost so much less than one highway, we could have a system basically from home to work.
        (eg smol trams to a midway se station to high-speed trains)

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There’s something that people really fail to grasp with solar, and that’s the fact there is bugger all energy in the sun, and you need a huge surface area to get any meaningful energy.

    A home solar array often takes up a significant chunk of the roof area, and the amount of surface area a car typically has means that even perfectly efficient solar panels wouldn’t collect enough energy to significantly contribute to the vehicle’s range.

    There’s a good reason why vehicle manufacturers don’t bother adding them.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There is good amount of energy in the sunshine. The output of solar arrays struggle to make big power out of small surface areas because we haven’t figured out how to get more than 20% of the power that hits the panel. If they do get 20% or more, it’s been with very expensive and fragile panels.

    • Revan343
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Solar panels are also added weight, which reduces range. Any way you look at it, it makes more sense to have the solar panels at a base location you go back to.

      I guess an RV, or a camp trailer, makes sense to have panels on it, but that’s about it

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There’s also things like Sentinel mode on Teslas that use power.

        My main gripe is people think a solar car will never need to be charged, or only on trips, and that’s just not the case.

  • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Something I find incredibly weird about US company culture is how they talk about overtime like it’s a good thing.

    “Our employees worked weekends, days and nights to make this happen! We wouldn’t have succeeded without people who are willing to give up their personal lives!”

    I hope they not only succeed but get shares. Doing weekends or nights for a company you don’t (partially) own feels like a con.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was thinking about the US lately. Can’t remember why exactly maybe some friends popped up on my Facebook.

      But I decided it actually wouldn’t be that bad of a place to live. If it wasn’t for the toxic work culture.

      If they worked normal hours and had 20+ holidays it would be alright. Other shit annoy me and you would have to make sure you live in the nice areas but I could live there and enjoy it. But the work culture is an absolute no go. Wish they were like the Aussie. Show up do hard day of work fuck off for some beers. If the surfs good call in sick and end up seeing your boss in the line up. Work hard for a few months then decide fuck it and go to Bali for a weekend accidentally stay there for two months then decide you need to go back to work because travelling is too much effort walk into a job 1 week after landing home.

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Find people who care about what they’re working on and they’ll go well beyond the extra mile. As an extra motivator, make it clear the company won’t be around if they don’t succeed. I’m sure these employees have shares, but tha only really matters if the company succeeds (extra motivation!). Unfortunately, there have been a ton of green/green-adjacent automotive “startups” that have struggled to gain a foothold. See also:

      (I’m sure many others)

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Fisker is nothing but a conman, always has been. His MO is literally to start a company, secure funding, make a personal fortune and then abandon the bankrupt shell and leave customers hanging.

      • Yaky@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Here are a few other interesting green automotive startups that didn’t make it:

        • Sono Motors’ Sono: Compact EV with solar panels, power sharing, intended to be easily repairable and included a detail manual. They had prototypes but never went to production. Now the company does niche solar applications.
        • Workhorse: Series Hybrid (think Chevy Volt) Pickup truck with onboard power for tools etc (was announced around or even before Rivian). Was a very pragmatic idea IMO. Later sort-of resold to Lordstown. Now company does some other things, like drones.
        • Lordstown Motors’ Endurance: EV Pickup Truck with hub motors. Made a few hundred, but they have been dragging it out long enough for Ford to make electric pickups. And the idea wasn’t too original even when it was announced.
  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    A solar powered car that topped at 70mph would be ideal,

    But goddamn, could you imagine just having one that topped at 30 MPh in a city? Infinite travel!

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you can park on top of a parking garage, or in a spot on ground level where sunshine is not too much blocked by the surrounding buildings, you could surely commute on sunshine. Home parking barely matters for day shift workers in this scenario.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m excited to see them succeed. I love it when stuff is designed with function over form, and made practically. I’m a tall person, this is the only small electric vehicle I feel I could actually fit in