French immigrants are eating our pets!
You must log in or register to comment.
Miao
Clearly AI is on the verge of taking over the world.
Ignorant Americans, never even heard of the common snailcat
Where the fuck are you from that they aren’t called catsnails? Odd. Been catsnails here since I can remember.
…you know people made fake pictures before image generation, right?
They made fake pictures before computers existed too.
I’ve seen the cave paintings deer and horses everywhere but when I look around nothing but rocks and trees.
yeah just shopped
Well duh it detects AI generated images that are at scale and that snail cat is way too small for it
cute snat…
We get them a lot around here. They don’t make for good pets, but they keep the borogoves at bay.
Which is great, honestly. Borogoves themselves are fine, but it’s not worth the risk letting them get all mimsy.
That’s clearly a cail
Are we all looking at the same snussy?
It has been
0days since classified military gene research has been leaked by interrogating ai detecting modelsWhat tool is this? I assume the tool is also AI based?
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job.
It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, they would have used a picture of a real shell.
Edit: plus the cat head looks weird where it connects to the head, and the markings don’t look right to me.
Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.
Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.
Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.
I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
Your reference is ancient and dusty and it makes me feel old. Stop it.
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.
Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though
There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?
There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.
They’re often too smooth.
Can we bring that back?
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.”
Back2thefuture_iknowthisone.png
That’s a song by the police, right?
Iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg
LOL
No spooky eyes, no extra limbs, no eery smile? - 100% real, genuine photograph! 👍
Isn’t there a whole thing about if you average out colors on AI generated photos you get a uniform beige color?
I don’t get why these tools don’t just do that but I guess you got to keep the marketing up of using AI to find a solution.
Either that’s not true of AI images or it’s true of all images. There aren’t answers that simple to this. Pixels are pixels.
It is absolutely not true of all AI images. I’d be surprised if it’s even true about most AI images.
I have two of those cats. I still can’t catch them when its time to go to bed.
Such a cute kitty snail! Can you post just the picture?
Its an “AI generated image at snail” :3
Detection for snail is positive.
