Amazon are proving year after year that it takes more than money to make games.

If you can’t trust someone called goonswarm games, who can you trust? 😔

Exactly. Read the room in other words!

I think down voting things you disagree with or want to discourage is a perfectly valid way to use them, and better in most cases than responding and further escalating a shit fight.

If something you post gets heavily downvoted, that’s information. You now know that your opinion is unpopular in that community. If you get down voted frequently and it really bothers you, it might be time to do some introspection on what you think or how you present yourself. Not all opinions are created equal, and you’re not entitled to people’s attention.

I can appreciate the opinion that discussion would be better, but I don’t think it’s realistic. Many times bad takes are coming from people who have no intention of listening, and just want to spew hate or argue. Down voting and moving on is a much better use of people’s time than arguing with these people. If for no other reason than preserving one’s mental health. It sends a message without feeding the trolls in other words.

As for how I use them? Funny/uplifting/valuable posts = upvote Don’t get it/not interesting to me = nothing Shit take/spam/obnoxious person/wrong community = downvote

Now kith 🫣

Do you know how to program, or are you trying to learn? That’s a big factor in what I would suggest.

Then you can embrace your potential as the weird naked neighbor

These types of ideas sound great before you know how much blinds cost. "Maybe I can live with it after all "

I mean maybe, but they’re not the only four legged animal around 🤷‍♂️

Everyone’s talking about the mad cow part, but this is also a really excellent point:

“Some of these people trying to define the future of humanity, creativity, or whatever it is using AI, are not the most humane or creative people. So they’re sort of saying, ‘We’re better at being human than you are.’ It’s obviously not true.”

It’s not a personal attack

And I took that personally!

I don’t agree because I love well cooked turkey, but there aren’t any rules so you’re free to not cook one if you don’t want to! No consensus necessary.

Was there context that led them to conclude polar bear? I would never have gotten that from this 😅

It almost looks like he just sucker punched it off 😆

I believe the important part is to make people scroll, not just the number of words. For some unholy reason google considers that a better website.

That’s also why some sites have a “go to recipe” button at the top now, which auto scrolls you to the recipe. They don’t care that you read the text, only that you scrolled a lot.

They’ll parrot back whatever attitude you’re talking to them in. I’ve seen screenshots of other people using them and the way they were talking was completely different from how they talk to me. I also get the monotone informational version.

It can get really fucked up actually and contributes to people humanizing the chatbot.

I don’t remember what it’s called but I’m pretty sure there is one I saw once and it was kind of terrifying looking.

The high-and-mightiness quotient in this thread is reaching critical levels

This is all great info, thank you!

I wish i could look at the overlapping sections in detail. That’s pretty exceptional looking. Is it bronze?