• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    if there’s anything trump is immune to, it’s all of these dozens upon dozens (hundreds?) of damning revelations, any one of which would torpedo anyone else’s prospect of walking free, let alone having a career in politics, let alone being a fucking presidential nominee.

    every media outlet fears trump’s wrath, because anyone he criticizes gets death threats, even though everything he says is 100% false bullshit

    if harris doesn’t win this by a landslide, then buckle your fucking seatbelts

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For those of us ignorant of the Logan act:

    The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes the negotiation of a dispute between the United States and a foreign government by an unauthorized American citizen. The intent behind the Act is to prevent unauthorized negotiations from undermining the government’s position.

  • corsicanguppy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. stop talking about it
    2. Arrest the criminal

    Why is this so hard?

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m pretty sure Florida is a right to work state, meaning trump has the absolute right to contact his boss for direction whenever he pleases/needs guidance.

  • SpacePirate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Imagining that a prosecutor could achieve the burden of proof on this is wishful thinking. This is yet another post title passing off opinion as fact.

    Actual title from the article:

    Logan Act: Why it could be illegal for Trump to call Putin

    Unless he or Putin come out and explicitly state he was performing diplomacy on behalf of the United States, and not e.g., conducting “personal business”, there is literally no case.

    Sure that personal business is undoubtedly quid pro quo, but that’s technically not illegal… just corrupt as fuck.

    • Gerudo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      It has to be 12 years out. 4 is too close to an election cycle. They can’t look like they are going after him after all.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      He’ll never be put on trial for this, and not for the usual reasons. The Logan Act has rarely been prosecuted, and none of the cases that were prosecuted resulted in convictions. It likely violates the First Amendment. It’s entirely possible the Supreme Court would make a unanimous decision on this one.

      This isn’t the first time the Logan Act has been brought up in regards to Trump, and I wish the media would stop. Of all the Not Happening of Trump crimes, this is the most Not Happening.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It likely violates the First Amendment.

        I know this will be one of the defenses for it, but this really is not a first amendment issue, it’s a national security issue.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    • “War” also revealed that Trump sent Putin COVID-19 testing machines during the early days of the pandemic for the Russian leader’s personal use.

    Meta

    phore

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    How did the party that’s supposed to care for American values end up supporting a candidate selling their values to the lowest bidder?

    This has to be a simulation. I’m so confused.